Multiple MRIs demagnetized an internal BAHA magnet – An enriching case for the everyday practice

References

• Marfatia H, Shah K, Shelke S, et al. Baha attract: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(4):544–548. doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1192-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wazen JJ, Wycherly B, Daugherty J. Complications of bone-anchored hearing devices. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurz A, Flynn M, Caversaccio M, et al. Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:416205. doi: 10.1155/2014/416205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadarmaki R, Tubbs R, Chen DA, et al. MRI information for commonly used otologic implants: review and update. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(4):512–519. doi: 10.1177/0194599813518306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambreville C, Labarre A, Thibaudier Y, et al. The spinal control of locomotion and step-to-step variability in left-right symmetry from slow to moderate speeds. J Neurophysiol. 2015;114(2):1119–1128. doi: 10.1152/jn.00419.2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman JM, Jacob RG. Jongkees’ formula re-evaluated: order effects in the response to alternate binaural bithermal caloric stimulation using closed-loop irrigation. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993;113(1):3–10. doi: 10.3109/00016489309135759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaij R, Adeva B, Adinolfi M, et al. Measurement of CP observables in B± → D(*)K± and B± → D(*)π± decays. Phys Lett B. 2018;777:16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner L, Hönig E, Fröhlich L, et al. Optimal retention force of audio processor magnets. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(5):e482–e487. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber BP, Goldring JE, Santogrossi T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant. Am J Otol. 1998;19(5):584–590.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, et al. Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging – compatibility and safety aspects. Radiology. 1998;208(3):700–708. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.3.9722849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majdani O, Leinung M, Rau T, et al. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(6):833–839. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson K, Håkansson B, Reinfeldt S, et al. MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(6):1887–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller P. Magnetic field sensing techniques. Magnetic measurement techniques for materials characterization. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 275–299.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch MH, Naumann IC, Mosier KM. BAHA devices and magnetic resonance imaging scanners. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(8):1095–1099. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818201fd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ay N, Gehl HB, Sudhoff H, et al. Effect of head position on cochlear implant MRI artifact. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(8):2763–2767. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06349-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves MJ, Mitchell DG. Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: a physicist’s and radiologist’s perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(2):269–287. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf H, Steidle G, Martirosian P, et al. Effects on MRI due to altered RF polarization near conductive implants or instruments. Med Phys. 2006;33(1):124–127. doi: 10.1118/1.2132571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;5(1):75–88. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880050115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackym PA, Michel MA, Prost RW, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(8):1355–1361. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todt I, Rademacher G, Mittmann P, et al. MRI artifacts and cochlear implant positioning at 3 T in vivo. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(6):972–976. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried TM, Dejaco D, Fischer N, et al. Dimensions and forms of artefacts in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI caused by cochlear implants. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08988-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinung M, Loth A, Gröger M, et al. Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(5):1297–1304. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05826-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nospes S, Brockmann MA, Läßig A. MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets—an update: overview and procedural management. Radiologe. 2019;59(1):48–56. doi: 10.1007/s00117-018-0462-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer D, Stieger C, Reichlin CJ, et al. Spinal surgery with electrically evoked potential monitoring and monopolar electrocautery: is prior removal of a cochlear implant necessary? Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(1):e7–e13. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muranaka H, Horiguchi T, Usui S, et al. Evaluation of RF heating on humerus implant in phantoms during 1.5 T MR imaging and comparisons with electromagnetic simulation. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5(2):79–88. doi: 10.2463/mrms.5.79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar