Use of complete mitochondrial genome sequences to identify barcoding markers for groups with low genetic distance

References

• Aguirre-Pabón J, Narváez Barandica J, Castro García L. 2013. Mitochondrial DNA variation of the bocachico Prochilodus magdalenae (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae) in the Magdalena River Basin, Colombia. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 23(4):594–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardura A, Planes S, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2013. Applications of DNA barcoding to fish landings: authentication and diversity assessment. Zookeys. (365):49–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandão-Dias PFP, Carmo AO, Martins APV, Pimenta RJG, Alves CBM, Kalapothakis E. 2014. Complete mitochondrial genome of Salminus brasiliensis (Characiformes, Characidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 27 (3): 1577-1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo AO, Brandão Dias PFP, Martins APV, Bedore AG, Kalapothakis E. 2014. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 27(3):1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro RMC, Vari RP. 2004. Detritivores of the South American fish family Prochilodontidae (Teleostei:Ostariophysi:Characiformes): a phylogenetic and revisionary study. Smithson Contrib Zool. (622):1–189.
   Google Scholar
• Chagas ATA, Carmo AO, Costa MA, Resende LC, Brandão Dias PFP, Martins APV, Kalapothakis E. 2015a. Description and comparison of two economically important fish species mitogenomes: Prochilodus argenteus and Prochilodus costatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae.). Mitochondrial DNA. 1736:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Chagas ATA, Costa MA, Martins APV, Resende LC, Kalapothakis E. 2015b. Illegal hunting and fishing in Brazil: a study based on data provided by environmental military police. Nat Conserv. 13(2):183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Coissac E, Hollingsworth PM, Lavergne S, Taberlet P. 2016. From barcodes to genomes: extending the concept of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol. 25(7):1423–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Silva GJ, Rodriguez MS, Roxo FF, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2015. Using different methods to access the difficult task of delimiting species in a complex neotropical hyperdiverse group. PLoS One. 10(9):e0135075–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawnay N, Ogden R, McEwing R, Carvalho GR, Thorpe RS. 2007. Validation of the barcoding gene COI for use in forensic genetic species identification. Forensic Sci Int. 173(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho DC, Oliveira DAA, Pompeu PS, Leal CG, Oliveira C, Hanner R. 2011. Deep barcode divergence in Brazilian freshwater fishes: the case of the São Francisco River basin. Mitochondrial DNA. 22(Suppl. 1):80–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Díaz J, Villanova GV, Brancolini F, Del Pazo F, Posner VM, Grimberg A, Arranz SE. 2016. First DNA barcode reference library for the identification of south American freshwater fish from the lower Raraná River. PLoS One. 11(7):e0157419–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira DG, Souza-Shibatta L, Shibatta OA, Sofia SH, Carlsson J, Dias JHP, Makrakis S, Makrakis MC. 2017. Genetic structure and diversity of migratory freshwater fish in a fragmented Neotropical river system. Rev Fish Biol Fisher. 27(1):209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecker AS. 1996. Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology. 77(6):1845–1854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freshwater DW, Tudor K, O’shaughnessy K, Wysor B. 2010. DNA barcoding in the red algal order Gelidiales: comparison of COI with rbcL and verification of the” barcoding gap. Cryptogamie Algol. 31(4):435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcez R, Calcagnotto D, De Almeida-Toledo LF. 2011. Population structure of the migratory fish Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes) from rio Grande basin (Brazil), an area fragmented by dams. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 21(3):268–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça WJ, Pavanelli CS. 2007. Peixes da planície de inundação do Alto Rio Paraná e áreas adjacentes. Maringá (PR): EDUEM.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano TA. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 22(2):160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 270(1512):313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RN, Wilson-Wilde L, Linacre A. 2014. Current and future directions of DNA in wildlife forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 10(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16(2):111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landínez-García RM, Alzate JF, Márquez EJ. 2016. Mitochondrial genome of the Neotropical trans-Andean fish Ichthyoelephas longirostris, Steindachner 1879 (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 27(3):2194–2195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado VN, Willis SC, Teixeira AS, Hrbek T, Farias IP. 2017. Population genetic structure of the Amazonian black flannelmouth characin (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae: Prochilodus nigricans Spix & Agassiz, 1829): contemporary and historical gene flow of a migratory and abundant fishery species. Environ Biol Fish. 100(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo BF, Dorini BF, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2018. Little divergence among mitochondrial lineages of Prochilodus (Teleostei, Characiformes). Front Genet. 9:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo BF, Sidlauskas BL, Hoekzema K, Frable BW, Vari RP, Oliveira C. 2016. Molecular phylogenetics of the Neotropical fish family Prochilodontidae (Teleostei: Characiformes). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 102:189–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden R. 2008. Fisheries forensics: the use of DNA tools for improving compliance, traceability and enforcement in the fishing industry. Fish Fisher. 9(4):462–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page TJ, Hughes JM. 2010. Comparing the performance of multiple mitochondrial genes in the analysis of Australian freshwater fishes. J Fish Biol. 77(9):2093–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parson W, Pegoraro K, Niederstätter H, Föger M, Steinlechner M. 2000. Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. Int J Legal Med. 114(1–2):23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LHG, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2013. Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna? BMC Genet. 14(1):20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pimentel JSM, Carmo AO, Rosse IC, Martins APV, Ludwig S, Facchin S, Pereira AH, Brandão-Dias PFP, Abreu NL, Kalapothakis E. 2018. High-throughput sequencing strategy for microsatellite genotyping using neotropical fish as a model. Frontiers in Genetics 9: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel JSM, Carmo AO, Maciel D, Siqueira FDF, Kalapothakis E. 2014. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887). Mitochondrial DNA. 27(3):1940–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 25(7):1253–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2012. ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 21(8):1864–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A. 2012. Figtree v 1.4.0. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G. e, Suchard MA. 2018. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 67(5):901–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales NG, Pessali TC, Andrade Neto FR, Carvalho DC. 2018. Introgression from non-native species unveils a hidden threat to the migratory Neotropical fish Prochilodus hartii. Biol Invasions. 20(3):555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos RD P. 2019. Descrição de genomas mitocondriais e inferência filogenética de cinco espécies de peixes migratórios do gênero Prochilodus. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. http://www.biblioteca.pucminas.br/teses/Biologia_SantosRP_1r.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Godinho HP. 2003. Migratory fishes of the Upper Paraná River. In: Carolsfeld J et al. Migratory Fishes of South America: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation Status. Ottawa (Canada): 195–231.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano EA, Melo BF, Freitas-Souza D, Oliveira MLM, Utsunomia R, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2019. Species delimitation in Neotropical fishes of the genus Characidium (Teleostei, Characiformes). Zool Scr. 48(1):69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siqueira FDF, Carmo AO, Pimentel JSM, Kalapothakis E. 2014. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes, Bryconidae). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 27:1942–1943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sivasundar A, Bermingham E, Orti G. 2001. Population structure and biogeography of migratory freshwater fishes (Prochilodus: Characiformes) in major South American rivers. Mol Ecol. 10(2):407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR. 2016. The past, present and future of mitochondrial genomics: have we sequenced enough mtDNAs? Brief Funct Genomics. 15(1):47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30(12):2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teletchea F. 2009. Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Rev Fish Biol Fisher. 19(3):265–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22(22):4673–4680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobe SS, Linacre A. 2010. DNA typing in wildlife crime: recent developments in species identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 6:195–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XC, Liu C, Huang L, Bengtsson-Palme J, Chen H, Zhang JH, Cai D, Li JQ. 2015. ITS1: a DNA barcode better than ITS2 in eukaryotes? Mol Ecol Resour. 15(3):573–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh J. 2007. DNA barcoding in animal species: progress, potential and pitfalls. Bioessays. 29(2):188–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics. 29(22):2869–2876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar