Complete chloroplast genome of Lamiophlomis rotata: comparative genome analysis and phylogenetic analysis

References

• Alexandros S. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizian D, Moore DM. 1982. Morphological and palynological Studies in Phlomis L., Eremostachys Bunge and Paraphlomis Prain (Labiatae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 85(4):225–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1982.tb00372.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27(2):573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock R. 2007. Structure, function, and inheritance of plastid genomes., In: Bock R., editor. Cell and molecular biology of plastids, Berlin, Germany: Springer, p. 29–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briquet J. 1897. Labiatae., In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Engler A, and Prantl K. W, editors. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann, p. 183–380.
   Google Scholar
• Cantino PD, Sanders RW. 1986. Subfamilial classification of Labiatae. Syst. Bot. 11(1):163–185. doi: 10.2307/2418955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantino PH, Harley RM, Wagstaff SJ. 1992. Genera of Labiatae: status and classification., in Advances in Labiate Science, Harley R. M. and Reynolds T, editors. London, British: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, p. 511–522.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell-Caballero J, Alonso R, Ibañez V, Terol J, Talon M, Dopazo J. 2015. A phylogenetic analysis of 34 chloroplast genomes elucidates the relationships between wild and domestic species within the genus Citrus. Mol Biol Evol. 32(8):2015–2035. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civaň P, Foster PG, Embley MT, Séneca A, Cox CJ. 2014. Analyses of charophyte chloroplast genomes help characterize the ancestral chloroplast genome of land plants. Genome Biol Evol. 6(4):897–911. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corriveau JL, Coleman AW. 1988. Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species. American J of Botany. 75(10):1443–1458. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11219.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosner ME, Jansen RK, Palmer JD, Downie SR. 1997. The highly rearranged chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum (Campanulaceae): multiple inversions, inverted repeat expansion and contraction, transposition, insertions/deletions, and several repeat families. Curr Genet. 31(5):419–429. doi: 10.1007/s002940050225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniell H, Lin CS, Yu M, Chang WJ. 2016. Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(4):e18. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie SR, Olmstead RG, Zurawski G, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Watson JC, Palmer JD. 1991. Six independent loss of the chloroplast DNA rpl2 intron in Dicotyledons: molecular and phylogenetic implications. Evolution. 45(5):1245–1259. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04390.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JJ. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dugas DV, Hernandez D, Koenen EJM, Schwarz E, Straub S, Hughes CE, Jansen RK, Nageswara-Rao M, Staats M, Trujillo JT, et al. 2015. Mimosoid legume plastome evolution: IR expansion, tandem repeat expansions, and accelerated rate of evolution in clpP. Sci Rep. 5(1):16958. doi: 10.1038/srep16958.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang LQ, Pan YZ, Gong X. 2007. A karyomorphological study in the monotypic genus Lamiophlomis and five species in Phlomis (Lamiaceae). Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 45(05):627–632. doi: 10.1360/aps050192.
   Google Scholar
• FastQC: a quality control tool for high-throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc. [Accessed December 3, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. 2004. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Web Server issue):W273–W279. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberle RC, Fourcade HM, Boore JL, Jansen RK. 2008. Extensive rearrangements in the chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum are associated with repeats and tRNA genes. J Mol Evol. 66(4):350–361. doi: 10.1007/s00239-008-9086-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hae-Lim L, Jansen RK, Chumley TW, Ki-Joong K. 2007. Gene relocations within chloroplast genomes of Jasminum and Menodora (Oleaceae) are due to multiple, overlapping inversions. Mol Biol Evol. 24(5):1161–1180. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann R. 2004. The sexual inheritance of plant organelles. In: Daniell H. and Chase C, editors. Molecular biology and biotechnology of plant organelles, Berlin, Germany: Springer Netherlands. p. 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hipkins VD, Marshall KA, Neale DB, Rottmann WH, Strauss SH. 1995. A mutation hotspot in the chloroplast genome of a conifer (Douglas-fir: pseudotsuga) is caused by variability in the number of direct repeats derived from a partially duplicated tRNA gene. Curr Genet. 27(6):572–579. doi: 10.1007/BF00314450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker JD. 1885. Labiatae. In: Flora of British India. London, British: Reeve & Co, Vol. 4, p. 604–705.
   Google Scholar
• Huang H, Shi C, Liu Y, Mao SY, Gao LZ. 2014. Thirteen Camellia chloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: genome structure and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Evol Biol. 14(1):151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang Y, Wang J, Yang Y, Fan C, Chen J. 2017. Phylogenomic analysis and dynamic evolution of chloroplast genomes in salicaceae. Front Plant Sci. 8:1050. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen RK, Ruhlman TA. 2012. Plasti genomes of seed plants. In: Bock, R. and Knoop, V, editors. Genomics of chloroplasts and mitochondria Berlin, Germany: Springer Netherlands, p. 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Jiangsu New Medical College. 1977. The Chinese medicine dictionary. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Jia H-m, Li X-w, Chai M-l, Jia H-j, Chen Z, Wang G-y, Chai C-y, van de Weg E, Gao Z-s 2012. Development of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers from a genome survey of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra). BMC Genomics. 13(1):201. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John R, Songling L, Mar AK, Standley DM, Kazutaka K. 2019. Mafft-dash: integrated protein sequence and structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(W1):W5–W10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaundun SS, Matsumoto S. 2002. Heterologous nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite amplification and variation in tea, Camellia sinensis. Genome. 45(6):1041–1048. doi: 10.1139/g02-070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo Y. 1929. Labiatarum Sino-Japonicarum Prodromus. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science and Agriculture. Taihoku Imperial Unive. 2:1–332.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. 2001. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 29(22):4633–4642. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633:.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenka D, Jan K, Cestmír V, Václav P. 2004. TrnL-trnF intergenic spacer and trnL intron define major clades within Luzula and Juncus (Juncaceae): Importance of structural mutations. J. Mol. Evol. 59:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-2598-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M-M, Wang D-Y, Zhang L, Kang M-H, Lu Z-Q, Zhu R-B, Mao X-X, Xi Z-X, Tao M. 2019. Intergeneric relationships within the family salicaceae s.l. based on plastid phylogenomics. Int. Int J Mol Sci. 20(15):3788. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XW. 1989. The geographic distribution of Labiatae in Hengduan Mountains. Bull Botanical Res. 9:103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lin CP, Wu CS, Huang YY, Chaw SM. 2012. The complete chloroplast genome of Ginkgo biloba reveals the mechanism of inverted repeat contraction. Genome Biol Evol. 4(3):374–381. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao-Lun W, Blazier JC, Madhumita G, Jansen RK. 2014. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol Biol Evol. 31(3):645–659. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiesen C. 2006. [Phylogeny and biogeography of the lamioid mint genus Phlomis L]. [PhD thesis]. Sweden: Natural History Museum University of Oslo. p. 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew K, Richard M, Amy W, Steven SH, Matthew C, Shane S. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millen RS, Olmstead RG, Adams KL, Palmer JD, Lao NT, Heggie L, Kavanagh TA, Hibberd JM, Gray JC, Morden CW, et al. 2001. Many parallel losses of infA from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus. Plant Cell. 13(3):645–658.,. doi: 10.2307/3871412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen VB, Park HS, Lee SC, Lee J, Park JY, Yang TJ. 2017. Authentication markers for five major Panax species developed via comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences. J Agric Food Chem. 65(30):6298–6306. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nock CJ, Waters DLE, Edwards MA, Bowen SG, Rice N, Cordeiro GM, Henry RJ. 2011. Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. Plant Biotechnol J. 9(3):328–333.,. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogihara Y, Terachi T, Sasakuma T. 1988. Intramolecular recombination of chloroplast genome mediated by short direct-repeat sequences in wheat species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 85(22):8573–8577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohba H. 1986. The juvenile plants of Phlomis rotata (Labeatae), With a taxonomic note. J. Jpn. Bot. 61:321–325.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer JD. 1991. Plastid chromosomes: structure and evolution. Mol. Biol. Plastids. 7:5–53. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-715007-9.50009-8.
   Google Scholar
• Pan YZ, Fang LQ, Hao G, Cai J, Gong X. 2009. Systematic positions of lamiophlomis and paraphlomis (lamiaceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequences. J of Sytematics Evolution. 47(6):535–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00050.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks M, Cronn R, Liston A. 2009. Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. BMC Biol. 7(1):84. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pauwels M, Vekemans X, Godé C, Frérot H, Castric V, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2012. Nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogeography reveals vicariance among European populations of the model species for the study of metal tolerance, Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae). New Phytol. 193(4):916–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04003.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell W, Morgante M, Mcdevitt R, Vendramin GG, Rafalski JA. 1995. Polymorphic simple sequence repeat regions in chloroplast genomes: applications to the population genetics of pines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92(17):7759–7763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu XJ, Moore MJ, Li DZ, Yi TS. 2019. PGA: a software package for rapid, accurate, and flexible batch annotation of plastomes. Plant Methods. 15(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0435-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raubeson LA, Jansen RK. 2005. 4 Chloroplast genomes of plants. In: Henry R.J, editor. Plant diversity and evolution: genotypic and phenotypic variation in higher plants, Wallingford, British: CAB International, p. 45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Glen S, Michael S, Blair HS. 2017. TimeTree: a resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:1812–1819. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H. 2002. Tethys retreat and Himalayans-Hengduanshan Mountains uplift and their significance on the origin and development of the Sino-Himalayan elements and alpine flora. Acta Botanica Yunnanica. 24:273–288.
   Google Scholar
• Sun YZ. 1955. Notes on the Chinese species of Paraphlomis. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 4:47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney R, Graner A. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 106(3):411–422. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas F, Massenet O, Dorne AM, Briat JF, Mache R. 1988. Expression of the rpl23, rpl2 and rps19 genes in spinach chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 16(6):2461–2472. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.6.2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira MLC, Santini L, Diniz AL, Munhoz CF. 2016. Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful. Genet Mol Biol. 39(3):312–328. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijverberg K, Bachmann K. 1999. Molecular evolution of a tandemly repeated trnF (GAA) gene in the chloroplast genomes of Microseris (Asteraceae) and the use of structural mutations in phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 16(10):1329–1340. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Luo J, Ma YZ, Mao XX, Liu JQ. 2019. Nuclear simple sequence repeat markers are superior to DNA barcodes for identification of closely related Rhododendron species on the same mountain. J Sytematics Evolution. 57(3):278–286. doi: 10.1111/jse.12460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D. 2011. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol Biol. 76(3-5):273–297. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Li HW. 1982. On the evolution and distribution in Labiatae. Acta Botanica Yunnanica. 4:97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Wu CY. 1985. Flora Xizangica. Beijing, China: science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu F-H, Chan M-T, Liao D-C, Hsu C-T, Lee Y-W, Daniell H, Duvall MR, Lin C-S. 2010. Complete chloroplast genome of Oncidium Gower Ramsey and evaluation of molecular markers for identification and breeding in Oncidiinae. BMC Plant Biol. 10(1):68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiong A-S, Peng R-H, Zhuang J, Gao F, Zhu B, Fu X-Y, Xue Y, Jin X-F, Tian Y-S, Zhao W, et al. 2009. Gene duplication, transfer, and evolution in the chloroplast genome. Biotechnol Adv. 27(4):340–347.,. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JB, Tang M, Li HT, Zhang ZR, Li DZ. 2013. Complete chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol Biol. 13(1):84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhou T, Duan D, Yang J, Feng L, Zhao G. 2016. Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Five Quercus Species. Front Plant Sci. 7:959. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24(8):1586–1591. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Quan, Liu, Yang, Sodmergen, (2003). Examination of the cytoplasmic DNA in male reproductive cells to determine the potential for cytoplasmic inheritance in 295 angiosperm species. Plant Cell Physiol, 9. 44, 941–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00405.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo LH, Shang AQ, Zhang S, Yu XY, Ren YC, Yang MS, Wang JM. 2017. The first complete chloroplast genome sequences of Ulmus species by de novo sequencing: genome comparative and taxonomic position analysis. PLoS One. 12(2):e0171264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar