Methane gas emission during the spontaneous combustion of sub-bituminous C coal with different organic sulfur content in the temporary stockpile

References

• Yulianto HD, Maulana FI, Wijaya DI. Performance analysis of the temporary stockpile reclaimer system in the mining industry using the Overall Throughput Effectiveness (OTE) method. E3S Web of Conf. 2023;426(2079):1–274. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202342602079
   Google Scholar
• Thabari JA, Auzani AS, Nirbito W, et al. Modeling of coal spontaneous fire in a large-scale stockpile. Int J Technol. 2022;14(2):257–266. doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v14i2.5367
   Google Scholar
• Chandralal N, Mahapatra D, Shome D, et al. Behaviour of low rank high moisture coal in large stockpile under ambient conditions. Am J Appl Sci Res Form App Nat Sci. 2014;6(1):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wan-Xing R, Zeng-Hui K, De-Ming W. Causes of spontaneous combustion of coal and its prevention technology in the tunnel Fall of ground of extra-thick coal seam. Procedia Eng. 2011;26:717–724. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2228
   Google Scholar
• Govender S, du Plessis JJL, Webber-Youngman RCW. A critical investigation into spontaneous combustion in coal storage bunkers. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2021;121(5):251–259. doi: 10.17159/2411-9717/16-478/2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao D, Guo L, Wang F, et al. Study on the spontaneous combustion tendency of coal based on grey relational and multiple regression analysis. ACS Omega. 2021;6(10):6736–6746. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendana M, Idris WMR, Rahim SA. Changes in air quality during and after large-scale social restriction periods in Jakarta city, Indonesia. Acta Geophysica. 2022;70(5):2161–2169. doi: 10.1007/s11600-022-00873-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Xueqing Z, Wen Y, et al. Pore structure and its impact on susceptibility to coal spontaneous combustion based on multiscale and multifractal analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63715-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protasov S, Seregin E, Portola V, et al. Study of the parameters of spontaneous fire seats in coal pit rock dumps. E3S Web Of Conf. 2021;315(2007):1–8. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131502007
   Google Scholar
• Su G, Jia B, Wang P, et al. Risk identifcation of coal spontaneous combustion based on COWA modifed G1 combination weighting cloud model. Scien Rep. 2022;12(2992):1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06972-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang W, Liang R, Qi Y, et al. Study on the prediction model of coal spontaneous combustion limit parameters and its application. Fire. 2023;6(381):1–15. doi: 10.3390/fire6100381
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li Z, He W, et al. Study on the change of organic sulfur forms in coal during low-temperature oxidation process. Fuel. 2018;222:350–361. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onifade M, Genc B, Wagner N. Influence of organic and inorganic properties of coal-shale on spontaneous combustion liability. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2019;29(6):851–857. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari SL, Rahmawati MA, Triyoga A, et al. Impact of sulphur content on coal quality at delta plain depositional environment: case study in geramat district, lahat regency, South Sumatra. J Geosci Eng Environ Tech. 2017;2(03):183–190. doi: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.3.301
   Google Scholar
• Leitea FFGD, Alves BJR, Nobrega GNN, et al. Checking the progress of using the static chamber method for themeasurement of greenhouse gases in Latin America. Carbon Manage. 2021;12(6):649–661. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega OAC, Beltran PEP, Pineda GSH, et al. Construction and operation of a respiration chamber of the head-box type for methane measurement from cattle. Animals. 2020;10(227):1–11. doi: 10.3390/ani10020227
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, 2022. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation on the Initiation Mechanism of Low-Rank Coal’s Self-Heating Process [ Dissertation]. Department of Mining Engineering West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Gerald B, Patson TF. Parametric and nonparametric tests: a brief review. Int J Stat Distrib Appl. 2021;7(3):78–82. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsd.20210703.12
   Google Scholar
• Rendana M, Idris WMR, Rahim SA. Atmospheric methane condition over the South Sumatera peatland during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2021;21(10):210072. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.210072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Yoo J, Umar DH. Low-rank coal and poly fatty acid distillate characterization as a preparation of coal upgrading palm oil technology. IOP conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2021;882(120380):1–11. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/882/1/012038
   Google Scholar
• Daulay B, Santoso B, Sodikin AI. Indonesian low rank coal resources to which ubc technology is commercially applicable. Indones Min J. 10(80):18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schweinfurth SP. An introduction to coal quality. In: Pierce BS Dennen KO, editors Chapter C of the National Coal Resource Assessment Overview, U.S. Geological survey. Reston, Virginia; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin HE, Tewalt SJ, Hower JC, et al. Geochemistry and petrology of selected coal samples from Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, and Papua, Indonesia. Int J Coal Geol. 2009;77(3–4):260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monika I, Sulistyohadi F. Ash deposit characteristics of blended coal in coal combustion process. Indones Min J. 2019;22(1):49–60. doi: 10.30556/imj.Vol22.No1.2019.675
   Google Scholar
• Gautama RS, Kusuma GJ, Pujiantoro E, et al., 2018. On the spatial variation of geochemical rock characteristics in coal mining: case bukit asam coal mine in South Sumatra. Indonesia, Conference: International Conference of Acid Rock Drainage & IMWA2018 Annual, Pretoria, South Africa (Tshwane University of Technology), Risk to Opportunity, II, 604–611
   Google Scholar
• Santoso B, Daulay B. Coalification trend in South Sumatera Basin. Indones Min J. 2006;9(6):9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rich AL, Patel JT. Carbon disulfide (CS2) mechanisms in formation of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) formation from unconventional shale gas extraction and processing operations and global climate change. Environ Health Insights. 2015;9(s1):35–39. doi: 10.4137/EHI.S15667
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao F, Jia Z, Qin M, et al. Effects of organic sulfur on oxidation spontaneous combustion characteristics of coking coal. Energy Explor Exploit. 2021;40(1):193–205. doi: 10.1177/01445987211049045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu Z, Sun F, Gao J, et al. A new insight into the role of coal adsorbed water in low-temperature oxidation: enhanced OH radical generation. Combust Flame. 2019;208:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang M, Yang Z, et al. Exothermic characteristics of coal during low-temperature oxidation based on grey correlation method. Energy Rep. 2022;8:6744–6752. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naifu Cao N, Gang Wang G, Yuntao Liang Y, et al. Study on the microscopic mechanism of spontaneous combustion and oxidation kinetics of water-leached coal. J Chem. 2021;2021(5564290):1–15. doi: 10.1155/2021/5564290
   Google Scholar
• Onifade M, Genc B. Spontaneous combustion of coals and coal-shales. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2018;28(6):933–940. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva J, Castro C, Teixeira S, et al. Evaluation of the gas emissions during the thermochemical conversion of eucalyptus woodchips. Processes. 2022;10(2413):1–12. doi: 10.3390/pr10112413
   Google Scholar
• Wang JR, Chen QW, Deng CB, et al. Reaction mechanism of coal spontaneous combustion producing methane. J China Coal Soc. 2009;34(12):1660–1664.
   Google Scholar
• Khairulin S, Kerzhentsev M, Salnikov A, et al. Direct selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide: laboratory, pilot and industrial tests. Catalysts. 2021;11(1109):1–45. doi: 10.3390/catal11091109
   Google Scholar
• Ma H, Sichen L, Zhou L, et al. Detailed kinetic modeling of H2S formation during fuel-rich combustion of pulverized coal. Fuel Process Technol. 2020;199(106276):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106276
   Google Scholar
• Gao F, Jia Z, Shan Y, et al. Influence of organic sulfur on low-temperature oxidation of coal and its transition characteristics. ACS Omega. 2022;7(44):39830–39839. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson MI, Chen XD. Survey of experimental work on the self-heating and spontaneous combustion of coal. Geol Soc Am Rev Eng Geol. 2007;XVIII:31–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zhafira HK, Widiani AS, Nugroho YS. Control of spontaneous combustion of sub-bituminous coal by means of heat exchanger submersion inside the piles, IOP conf. Ser: J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1107(62004):1–6. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1107/6/062004
   Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Sun L, Jia T, et al. Rapid contrastive experimental study on the adiabatic spontaneous combustion period of loose lignite. ACS Omega. 2021;6(50):34989–35001. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi Z, Xi K, Lu L, et al. Study on oxidation characteristics and conversion of sulfur-containing model compounds in coal. Fuel. 2023;331(1):125756. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125756
   Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li Y, Zhang L, et al. Study on the effect of organic sulfur on coal spontaneous combustion based on model compounds. Fuel. 2021;289(119846):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119846
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf M. The role of organic sulfur in the formation of methane emissions on the spontaneous combustion of coal. J Ecol Eng. 2023;24(4):192–201. doi: 10.12911/22998993/159632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong X, Wen Z, Wang F, et al. Law of gas production during coal heating oxidation. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2019;29(4):617–620. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Quan Y, Cai G, et al. Meticulous graded and early warning system of coal spontaneous combustion based on index gases and characteristic temperature. ACS Omega. 2023;8(7):6801–6812. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Lei C, Xiao Y, et al. Determination and prediction on “three zones” of coal spontaneous combustion in a gob of fully mechanized caving face. Fuel. 2018;211:458–470. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui X, Xue H, Zhan X, et al. Measurement and numerical simulation of coal spontaneous combustion in goaf under Y‑type ventilation mode. ACS Omega. 2022;7(11):9406–9421. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Ming H, Guo T, et al. Semi‑enclosed experimental system for coal spontaneous combustion for determining regional distribution of high‑temperature zone of coal fire. Int J Coal Sci Technol. 2022;9(62):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s40789-022-00535-8
   Google Scholar
• Marangwanda GT, Madyira DM, Babarinde TO. Coal combustion models: an overview. J Phys. 2019;1378(32070):1–13. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032070
   Google Scholar
• Armand CT, Akong O, Bonoma B. Numerical study of burning of biomass in fixed bed. Energy Power Eng. 2019;11(2):35–57. doi: 10.4236/epe.2019.112003
   Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Muller D, Kar J. Effect of natural ilmenite on the solid biomass conversion of inhomogeneous fuels in small-scale bubbling fluidized beds. Energies. 2022;15(2747):1–21. doi: 10.3390/en15082747
   Google Scholar