Publication Cover
Sustainable Environment
An international journal of environmental health and sustainability
Volume 9, 2023 - Issue 1
2,771
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Striving towards carbon neutrality target in BRICS economies: Assessing the implications of composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor:)
Article: 2210950 | Received 12 Dec 2022, Accepted 02 May 2023, Published online: 10 May 2023

References

  • Abid, N., Ceci, F., Ahmad, F., & Aftab, J. (2022). Financial development and green innovation, the ultimate solutions to an environmentally sustainable society: Evidence from leading economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 133223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133223
  • Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Renewable energy consumption and environmental sustainability in Canada: Does political stability make a difference? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 61307–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20008-4
  • Adebayo, T. S., Akadiri, S. S., Akanni, E. O., & Sadiq-Bamgbopa, Y. (2022). Does political risk drive environmental degradation in BRICS countries? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21), 32287–32297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20002-w
  • Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., & Khan, Z. (2021). Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter? Sustainable Cities and Society, 70, 102881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881
  • Ahmad, M., Muslija, A., & Satrovic, E. (2021). Does economic prosperity lead to environmental sustainability in developing economies? Environmental Kuznets curve theory. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 22588–22601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12276-9
  • Ahmad, M., & Zheng, J. (2021). Do innovation in environmental-related technologies cyclically and asymmetrically affect environmental sustainability in BRICS nations? Technology in Society, 67, 101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101746
  • Ahmed, Z., Caglar, A. E., & Murshed, M. (2022). A path towards environmental sustainability: The role of clean energy and democracy in ecological footprint of Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132007
  • Alharthi, M., Dogan, E., & Taskin, D. (2021). Analysis of CO2 emissions and energy consumption by sources in MENA countries: Evidence from quantile regressions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29), 38901–38908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13356-0
  • Ali, S., Dogan, E., Chen, F., & Khan, Z. (2021). International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emitters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption. Sustainable Development, 29(2), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2153
  • Amin, N., Shabbir, M. S., Song, H., Farrukh, M. U., Iqbal, S., & Abbass, K. (2023). A step towards environmental mitigation: Do green technological innovation and institutional quality make a difference? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122413
  • Anser, M. K., Usman, M., Godil, D. I., Shabbir, M. S., Sharif, A., Tabash, M. I., & Lopez, L. B. (2021). Does globalization affect the green economy and environment? The relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(37), 51105–51118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14243-4
  • Ashraf, J. (2022a). Do political risk and globalization undermine environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(8), 3647–3664. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3620
  • Ashraf, J. (2022b). The spillover effects of political risk, financial risk, and economic freedom on ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from belt and road initiative countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(5), 873–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.06.004
  • Ashraf, J. (2023). Does political risk undermine environment and economic development in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from China–Pakistan economic corridor. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(1), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09434-z
  • Bölük, G., & Mert, M. (2014). Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy, 74, 439–446.
  • Campello, M., Galvao, A. F., & Juhl, T. (2019). Testing for slope heterogeneity bias in panel data models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(4), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2017.1421545
  • Cheng, S., Fan, W., Meng, F., Chen, J., Liang, S., Song, M., Liu, G., & Casazza, M. (2020). Potential role of fiscal decentralization on interprovincial differences in CO2 emissions in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(2), 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04026
  • Chen, J., Wang, P., Cui, L., Huang, S., & Song, M. (2018). Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD. Applied Energy, 231, 937–950.
  • Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
  • Chu, L. K., & Tran, T. H. (2022). The nexus between environmental regulation and ecological footprint in OECD countries: Empirical evidence using panel quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(33), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19221-y
  • Çoban, S., & Topcu, M. (2013). The nexus between financial development and energy consumption in the EU: A dynamic panel data analysis. Energy Economics, 39, 81–88.
  • Danish. (2020). Moving toward sustainable development: The relationship between water productivity, natural resource rent, international trade, and carbon dioxide emissions. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2007
  • Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Dogbe, C. S. K. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143
  • Deng, H., Zhang, W., & Liu, D. (2023). Does carbon emission trading system induce enterprises’ green innovation? Journal of Asian Economics, 86, 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2023.101597
  • Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1(2), 277–300.
  • Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  • Erdogan, S. (2021). Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and building sector carbon emissions in the BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780
  • Fang, Z. (2023). Assessing the impact of renewable energy investment, green technology innovation, and industrialization on sustainable development: A case study of China. Renewable Energy, 205, 772–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.014
  • Feng, Y., Wang, X., Du, W., Wu, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184
  • Fu, G., & Zhu, S. (2023). Innovation, financial risk and natural resources for sustainable development: Fresh evidence from BRICS economies. Resources Policy, 80, 103252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103252
  • Galeotti, M., Salini, S., & Verdolini, E. (2020). Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 136, 111052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111052
  • Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Ali, S., Shahzad, U., & Cui, L. (2021). Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: An empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112779
  • Hao, Y., & Chen, P. (2023). Do renewable energy consumption and green innovation help to curb CO2 emissions? Evidence from E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8), 21115–21131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23723-0
  • Huang, Y., Ahmad, M., Ali, S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). Does eco-innovation promote cleaner energy? Analyzing the role of energy price and human capital. Energy, 239, 122268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122268
  • Ibrahim, R. L. (2022a). Beyond COP26: Can income level moderate fossil fuels, carbon emissions, and human capital for healthy life expectancy in Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(58), 87568–87582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21872-w
  • Ibrahim, R. L. (2022b). Post-COP26: Can energy consumption, resource dependence, and trade openness promote carbon neutrality? Homogeneous and heterogeneous analyses for G20 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(57), 86759–86770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21855-x
  • Ibrahim, R. L., Ajide, K. B., Usman, M., & Kousar, R. (2022). Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? Renewable Energy, 200, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.134
  • Ibrahim, R. L., Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., Bello, A. K., & Raimi, L. (2022). On the criticality of renewable energy to sustainable development: Do green financial development, technological innovation, and economic complexity matter for China? Renewable Energy, 199, 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.101
  • Ibrahim, R. L., Huang, Y., Mohammed, A., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Natural resources-sustainable environment conflicts amidst COP26 resolutions: Investigating the role of renewable energy, technology innovations, green finance, and structural change. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2162147
  • Ibrahim, R. L., & Mohammed, A. (2023). On energy transition-led sustainable environment in COP26 era: Policy implications from tourism, transportation services, and technological innovations for Gulf countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 14663–14679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23165-8
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  • Işık, C., Ongan, S., & Özdemir, D. (2019). Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: An application of heterogeneous panel estimation method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(11), 10846–10853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04514-6
  • Kampas, A., Czech, K., & Rozakis, S. (2021) Do globalisation and environmental policy stringency affect the environmental terms of trade? Evidence from the V4 countries (No. 2021-1)
  • Kao, C., Chiang, M. H., & Chen, B. (1999). International R&D spillovers: An application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.16
  • Karhunmaa, K. (2019). Attaining carbon neutrality in Finnish parliamentary and city council debates. Futures, 109, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.009
  • Kartal, M. T., Kılıç Depren, S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2023). Asymmetric effect of political stability on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK: Long-run evidence from nonlinear ARDL and frequency domain causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 33886–33897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24550-z
  • Khan, Z., Murshed, M., Dong, K., & Yang, S. (2021). The roles of export diversification and composite country risks in carbon emissions abatement: Evidence from the signatories of the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement. Applied Economics, 53(41), 4769–4787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1907289
  • Khan, H., Weili, L., & Khan, I. (2022). Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: An integrated investigation about environmental sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(3), 3832–3862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y
  • Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Belhadi, A., & Mardani, A. (2020). Investigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 272, 111089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111089
  • Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., Ul Haq, Z., Shaofu, G., & Hang, J. (2022). On the goals of sustainable production and the conditions of environmental sustainability: Does cyclical innovation in green and sustainable technologies determine carbon dioxide emissions in G-7 economies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.022
  • Kirikkaleli, D., Shah, M. I., Adebayo, T. S., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Does political risk spur environmental issues in China? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(41), 62637–62647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19951-z
  • Kongbuamai, N., Bui, Q., & Nimsai, S. (2021). The effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: The role of environmental policy in BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(22), 27885–27899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12551-3
  • Lin, B., & Ma, R. (2022). Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434
  • Li, S., Samour, A., Irfan, M., & Ali, M. (2023). Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency. Renewable Energy, 205, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.047
  • Li, J., Zhang, X., Ali, S., & Khan, Z. (2020). Eco-innovation and energy productivity: New determinants of renewable energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111028.
  • Mehmood, U. (2023). Analyzing the role of political risk, GDP, and Eco-Innovations Towards CO2 Emissions in South Asian Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01292-y
  • Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
  • Minlah, M. K., & Zhang, X. (2021). Testing for the existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for CO 2 emissions in Ghana: Evidence from the bootstrap rolling window Granger causality test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2), 2119–2131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10600-x
  • Murshed, M. (2021). LPG the LPG consumption and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in South Asia is time-series ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 8337–8372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10701-7
  • Nasir, M. A., Canh, N. P., & Le, T. N. L. (2021). Environmental degradation & role of financialisation, economic development, industrialisation and trade liberalisation. Journal of environmental management, 277, 111471.
  • Nathaniel, S. P., Murshed, M., & Bassim, M. (2021). The nexus between economic growth, energy use, international trade and ecological footprints: The role of environmental regulations in N11 countries. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6(6), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00205-y
  • Neves, S. A., Marques, A. C., & Patrício, M. (2020). Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? Econ. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.005
  • Ngepah, N., & Udeagha, M. C. (2018). African regional trade agreements and intra-African trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 33(1), 1176–1199. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1176
  • Ngepah, N., & Udeagha, M. C. (2019). Supplementary trade benefits of multi-memberships in African regional trade agreements. Journal of African Business, 20(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2019.1584719
  • Omokanmi, O. J., Ibrahim, R. L., Ajide, K. B., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2022). Exploring the dynamic impacts of natural resources and environmental pollution on longevity in resource-dependent African countries: Does income level matter? Resources Policy, 79, 102959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102959
  • Onifade, S. T., Bekun, F. V., Phillips, A., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). How do technological innovation and renewables shape environmental quality advancement in emerging economies: An exploration of the E7 bloc? Sustainable Development, 30(6), 2002–2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2366
  • Ozturk, I., & Al-Mulali, U. (2015). Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecological indicators, 57, 324–330.
  • Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI and GDP: Evidence from a panel of BRIC countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693.
  • Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., & Huang, R. (2021). The role of financial deepening and green technology on carbon emissions: Evidence from major OECD economies. Finance Research Letters, 41, 101794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794
  • Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  • Pesaran, M., & Smith, R. (2004). General diagnostic test for cross sectional independence in panel. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F
  • Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  • Pham, N. M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view. Journal of environmental management, 260, 110143.
  • Ponce, P., & Khan, S. A. R. (2021). A causal link between renewable energy, energy efficiency, property rights, and CO2 emissions in developed countries: A road map for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(28), 37804–37817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12465-0
  • Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769601900208
  • Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
  • Qin, L., Kirikkaleli, D., Hou, Y., Miao, X., & Tufail, M. (2021). Carbon neutrality target for G7 economies: Examining the role of environmental policy, green innovation and composite risk index. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113119
  • Rafique, M. Z., Fareed, Z., Ferraz, D., Ikram, M., & Huang, S. (2022). Exploring the heterogenous impacts of environmental taxes on environmental footprints: An empirical assessment from developed economies. Energy, 238, 121753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121753
  • Razzaq, A., Fatima, T., & Murshed, M. (2023). Asymmetric effects of tourism development and green innovation on economic growth and carbon emissions in Top 10 GDP Countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(3), 471–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1990029
  • Salim, R., Yao, Y., & Chen, G. S. (2017). Does human capital matter for energy consumption in China? Energy Economics, 67, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.016
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper and Brothers.
  • Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Ahmad, N., & Alam, S. (2016). Financial Development and Environmental Quality: The Way Forward. Energy Policy, 98, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.002
  • Shah, M. I., Usman, M., Obekpa, H. O., & Abbas, S. (2023). Nexus between environmental vulnerability and agricultural productivity in BRICS: What are the roles of renewable energy, environmental policy stringency, and technology? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 15756–15774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23179-2
  • Shan, S., Genç, S. Y., Kamran, H. W., & Dinca, G. (2021). Role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in carbon neutrality: A sustainable investigation from Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 113004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113004
  • Shao, X., Zhong, Y., Liu, W., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021). Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries: Evidence from advance panel estimations. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113189
  • Sharif, A., Kocak, S., Khan, H. H. A., Uzuner, G., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Demystifying the links between green technology innovation, economic growth, and environmental tax in ASEAN-6 countries: The dynamic role of green energy and green investment. Gondwana Research, 115, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.010
  • Shen, J., Ridwan, L. I., Raimi, L., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Recent developments in green hydrogen–environmental sustainability nexus amidst energy efficiency, green finance, eco-innovation, and digitalization in top hydrogen-consuming economies. Energy & Environment, 0958305X(231153936), 0958305X2311539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231153936
  • Sohag, K., Kalugina, O., & Samargandi, N. (2019). Re-visiting environmental Kuznets curve: Role of scale, composite, and technology factors in OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(27), 27726–27737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05965-7
  • Sohag, K., Mariev, O., & Davidson, N. (2021). Revising environmental Kuznets curve in Russian regions: Role of environmental policy stringency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 52873–52886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14515-z
  • Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., Afshan, S., Sharif, A., Kasim, M. A., & Hanafi, S. R. M. (2022). How does green technology innovation affect green growth in ASEAN-6 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. Gondwana Research, 111, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.06.019
  • Su, Z. W., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463
  • Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253.
  • Tedino, V. (2017). Environmental impact of economic growth in BRICS. Undergrad. Honor. Theses, Univ. Color.
  • Temesgen Hordofa, T., Minh Vu, H., Maneengam, A., Mughal, N., The Cong, P., & Liying, S. (2023). Does eco-innovation and green investment limit the CO2 emissions in China? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2116067
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2021). Estimating the trade-environmental quality relationship in SADC with a dynamic heterogeneous panel model. African Review of Economics and Finance, 13(1), 113–165.
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023a). Can fiscal decentralization be the route to the race to zero emissions in South Africa? Fresh policy insights from novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lag simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25306-z
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023b). Exploring the moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00396-9
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023c). On the asymmetric effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions in SADC with a nonlinear ARDL approach. Discover Sustainability, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00117-3
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023d). Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and CO2 emissions in South Africa: Fresh policy insights. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00453-x
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023e). The role of financial development in climate change mitigation: Fresh policy insights from South Africa. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-023-00110-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2022a). Environmental sustainability in South Africa: Understanding the criticality of economic policy uncertainty, fiscal decentralization, and green innovation. Sustainable Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2473
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2022b). Investigating the moderating role of economic policy uncertainty in environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: Evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(51), 77199–77237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21107-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023a). Achieving regional sustainability and carbon neutrality target in BRICS economies: Understanding the importance of fiscal decentralization, export diversification and environmental innovation. Sustainable Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2535
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023b). Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: Fresh policy insights from the BRICS nations. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2183526
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2019). Revisiting trade and environment nexus in South Africa: Fresh evidence from new measure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(28), 29283–29306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05944-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2020). Trade liberalization and the geography of industries in South Africa: Fresh evidence from a new measure. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(3), 354–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2019.1695652
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2021). The asymmetric effect of trade openness on economic growth in South Africa: A nonlinear ARDL approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 54(2), 491–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09285-6
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022a). The asymmetric effect of technological innovation on CO2 emissions in South Africa: New evidence from the QARDL approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 985719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.985719
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022b). Disaggregating the environmental effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in South Africa: Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(3), 1767–1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09368-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022c). Does trade openness mitigate the environmental degradation in South Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(13), 19352–19377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022d). Dynamic ARDL simulations effects of fiscal decentralization, green technological innovation, trade openness, and institutional quality on environmental sustainability: evidence from South Africa. Sustainability, 14(16), 10268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610268
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023a). Can public–private partnership investment in energy (PPPI) mitigate CO2 emissions in South Africa? Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1044605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1044605
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023b). Striving towards environmental sustainability in the BRICS economies: The combined influence of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2123411
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. N. (2021) A step towards environmental mitigation in South Africa: Does trade liberalisation really matter? fresh evidence from a novel dynamic ARDL Simulations Approach. Research Square.
  • Usman, M., & Hammar, N. (2021). Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 15519–15536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z
  • van Vu, T., & Huang, D. C. (2020). Economic development, globalization, political risk and CO2 emission: The case of vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 021. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.021
  • Wang, Z., Chandavuth, Y., Zhang, B., Ahmed, Z., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Environmental degradation, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: Assessing the role of financial and political risks. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116678
  • Wang, C., Elfaki, K. E., Zhao, X., Shang, Y., & Khan, Z. (2022). International trade and consumption‐based carbon emissions: Does energy efficiency and financial risk ensure sustainable environment? Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1451–1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2320
  • Wang, P., Wu, W., Zhu, B., & Wei, Y. (2013). Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy, 106, 65–71.
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
  • Xu, L., Fan, M., Yang, L., & Shao, S. (2021). Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China’s city level. Energy Economics, 99, 105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105269
  • Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R. (2019). Human capital and energy consumption: Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Economics, 84, 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104534
  • Yeh, J. C., & Liao, C. H. (2017). Impact of population and economic growth on carbon emissions in Taiwan using an analytic tool STIRPAT. Sustainable Environment Research, 27(1), 41–48.
  • Yirong, Q. (2022). Does environmental policy stringency reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from high-polluted economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130648
  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.
  • Yuan, B., Li, C., Yin, H., & Zeng, M. (2022). Green innovation and China’s CO2 emissions–the moderating effect of institutional quality. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(5), 877–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1915260
  • Yue, X. G., Liao, Y., Zheng, S., Shao, X., & Gao, J. (2021). The role of green innovation and tourism towards carbon neutrality in Thailand: Evidence from bootstrap ADRL approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112778
  • Yu, Z., Ridwan, I. L., Khan, M., Tanveer, S. A. R., & Khan, S. A. R. (2023). Investigating the nexuses between transportation Infrastructure, renewable energy Sources, and economic Growth: Striving towards sustainable development. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(2), 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101843
  • Zhang, Y. J. (2011). The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy, 39(4), 2197–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026
  • Zhang, Q., Adebayo, T. S., Ibrahim, R. L., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2022). Do the asymmetric effects of technological innovation amidst renewable and non-renewable energy make or mar carbon neutrality targets? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2120559
  • Zhang, W., & Chiu, Y. B. (2020). Do country risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? A non-linear perspective. Energy, 206, 118048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118048
  • Zhang, G., Deng, N., Mou, H., Zhang, Z. G., & Chen, X. (2019). The impact of the policy and behavior of public participation on environmental governance performance: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data in China. Energy Policy, 129, 1347–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.030
  • Zhang, C., & Lin, Y. (2012). Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China. Energy Policy, 49, 488–498.
  • Zhang, K. M., & Wen, Z. G. (2008). Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1249–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.019
  • Zhou, D., Zhang, X., & Wang, X. (2020). Research on coupling degree and coupling path between China’s carbon emission efficiency and industrial structure upgrading. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 27, 25149–25162.
  • Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., & Duan, C. (2023). How does green finance affect the low-carbon economy? Capital allocation, green technology innovation and industry structure perspectives. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 3519–3541. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2110138
  • Zou, X., Yang, S., Ibrahim, R. L., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Probing the environmental impacts of structural transition and demographic mobility in Africa: Does technological innovation matter? Energy & Environment, 0958305X231153967. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231153967