75
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Living law, normative pluralism, and “fare dodging” on public transport in Budapest

ORCID Icon
Pages 108-127 | Received 25 May 2023, Accepted 08 Dec 2023, Published online: 05 Feb 2024

References

  • Ambus, B. 2021. Jegyeket, bérleteket! Így dolgoznak a BKK munkatársai, Index. November 8. https://index.hu/belfold/2021/10/08/a-jegyellenor-a-fori-s-es-a-bliccelo-rekorder/
  • Benson, M., and K. O’Reilly. 2009. “Migration and the Search for a Better Way of Life: A Critical Exploration of Lifestyle Migration.” The Sociological Review 57 (4): 608–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01864.x
  • BKK. 2022. A BKK szamokban. https://bkk.hu/magunkrol/rolunk/a-bkk-szamokban/
  • BKV. 2010. Ellenőrt fogtak az ellenőrök. https://www.bkv.hu/inx.php/aktualis_tenrek/hu/sajtoszoba/hirek_kozlemenyek_archivum/ellenort_fogtak_az_ellenorok_
  • BKK. 2021. 4. epizód – ‘Teljesen megváltozott a hozzáállása, fogta magát, és vett egy jegyet’ - ellenőrök és ellenőrzés. [podcast] Nekem Budapest. https://bkk.hu/hirek/nekembudapest/
  • Blundo, G. 2017. “Hidden Acts, Open Talks. How Anthropology Can "Observe" and Describe Corruption.” In Corruption and the Secret of Law: A Legal Anthropological Perspective, edited by M. Nuijten, and G. Anders, 2nd edn., 27–52. London: Routledge.
  • Ehrlich, E. 2002. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  • Gawlewicz, A. 2016. “Language and Translation Strategies in Researching Migrant Experience of Difference from the Position of Migrant Researcher.” Qualitative Research 16 (1): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114557992
  • GRECO (Group of States Against Corruption). 2002. “Evaluation Report I.” Strasbourg.
  • Hertogh, M. 2004. “A ‘European’ Conception of Legal Consciousness: Rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich.” Journal of Law and Society 31 (4): 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2004.00299.x
  • Hopman, M. J. 2022. “Wait, What Are we Fighting about?–Kelsen, Ehrlich and the Reconciliation of Normative Jurisprudence and Sociology of Law.” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 54 (2-3): 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1973204
  • Jancsics, D. 2013. “Petty Corruption in Central and Eastern Europe: The Clients Perspective.” Crime, Law and Social Change 60 (3): 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9451-0
  • Kintrea, K. and Madgin, R. ed. 2019. Transforming Glasgow: Beyond the Post-Industrial City. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Kiss, E. 2002. “Restructuring in the Industrial Areas of Budapest in the Period of Transition.” Urban Studies 39 (1): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220099078
  • Kozlowska, O. 2010. “The Lived Experience of Economic Migration in the Narratives of Migrants from Post-Communist Poland to Britain.” PhD diss., University of Wolverhampton.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1967) 1996. “The Right to the City.” In Writings on Cities, edited by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas, 63–184. London: Blackwell.
  • Lefebvre, H. 2004. Rhythm Analysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life, London: Continuum.
  • Ledeneva, A. ed. 2018. Global Encyclopaedia of Informality, Volume 1: Towards Understanding of Social and Cultural Complexity. London: UCL Press.
  • Ledeneva, A., R. Bratu, and P. Köker. 2017. “Corruption Studies for the Twenty-First Century: Paradigm Shifts and Innovative Approaches.” Slavonic & East European Review 95 (1): 1–20.
  • Li, L. 2018. “The Moral Economy of Guanxi and the Market of Corruption: Networks, Brokers and Corruption in China’s Courts.” International Political Science Review 39 (5): 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118791585
  • Marcuse, P. 2014. “Reading the Right to the City.” City 18 (1): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.878110
  • Machon, P., and A. Dingsdale. 1989. “Public Transport in a Socialist Capital City: Budapest.” Geography 74 (2): 159–162.
  • Merry, S. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
  • Moore, S. 1973. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7 (4): 719–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967
  • Morris, J., and A. Polese. 2016. “Informal Health and Education Sector Payments in Russian and Ukrainian Cities: Structuring Welfare from below.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (3): 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414522081
  • Mulíček, O., and D. Seidenglanz. 2019. “Public Transport in Brno: From Socialist to Post-Socialist Rhythms.” In Post-Socialist Urban Infrastructures, 158–177. London: Routledge.
  • Nelken, D. 1984. “Law in Action or Living Law? Back to the Beginning in Sociology of Law.” Legal Studies 4 (2): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1984.tb00439.x
  • Nuijten, M., and G. Anders. eds. 2007. Corruption and the Secret of Law: A Legal Anthropological Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Polese, A., B. Kovács, and D. Jancsics. 2018. “Informality ‘in Spite Of’ or ‘Beyond’ the State: Some Evidence from Hungary and Romania.” European Societies 20 (2): 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2017.1354390
  • Shore, C., and D. Haller. 2005. Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
  • Szalai, A. 2021. “Leállás előtt a fővárosi tömegközlekedés.” Nepszava, November 23. https://nepszava.hu/3138725_leallas-elott-a-fovarosi-tomegkozlekedes
  • von Benda-Beckmann, K., and B. Turner. 2020. “Anthropological Roots of Global Legal Pluralism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, 138. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.