Using bench protocol platforms to improve compliance with systematic review guidance documents and reporting checklists: Proof of concept

References

• Booth, A., M. Clarke, G. Dooley, D. Ghersi, D. Moher, M. Petticrew, L. Stewart, et al. 2012. “The Nuts and Bolts of PROSPERO: An International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.” Systematic Reviews 1 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Booth, A., A. S. Mitchell, A. Mott, S. James, S. Cockayne, S. Gascoyne, C. McDaid, et al. 2020. “An Assessment of the Extent to Which the Contents of PROSPERO Records Meet the Systematic Review Protocol Reporting Items in PRISMA-P.” F1000Research 9: 773. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25181.2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, J., P. Glasziou, C. Del Mar, A. Bannach-Brown, P. Stehlik, and A. M. Scott. 2020. “A Full Systematic Review Was Completed in 2 Weeks Using Automation Tools: A Case Study.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 121: 81–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane. 2020. ReviewManager [Windows]. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software/revman.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., G. Bowker, S. Jackson, and R. Williams. 2009. “Introduction: An Agenda for Infrastructure Studies.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 364–374. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Y. Cai, K. Yang, M. Liu, S. Shi, J. Chen, Y. Sun, et al. 2020. “Methodological and Reporting Quality in non-Cochrane Systematic Review Updates Could Be Improved: A Comparative Study.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 119: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., B. Macura, P. Whaley, and A. S. Pullin. 2018. “ROSES Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro Forma, Flow-Diagram and Descriptive Summary of the Plan and Conduct of Environmental Systematic Reviews and Systematic Maps.” Environmental Evidence 7 (1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., ed. 2019. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Hoboken: Cochrane. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T, T. Lasserson, J. Chandler, D. Tovey, and R. Churchill. 2019. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). Hoboken: Cochrane. https://community.cochrane.org/mecir-manual.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe, A. O., M. Kovacs, F. Aust, and B. Aczel. 2020. “Documenting Contributions to Scholarly Articles Using CRediT and Tenzing.” PLOS One 15 (12): e0244611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. 2011. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13059
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2016. “The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.” The Milbank Quarterly 94 (3): 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, C., E. J. McIntosh, S. Unger, N. R. Haddaway, S. Kecke, J. Schiemann, R. Wilhelm, et al. 2018. “Online Tools Supporting the Conduct and Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Systematic Maps: A Case Study on CADIMA and Review of Existing Tools.” Environmental Evidence 7 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, M., A. M. Collings, C. Graf, V. Kiermer, D. Mellor, S. Swaminathan, D. Sweet, et al. 2021. “The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for Transparent Reporting in the Life Sciences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (17): e2103238118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103238118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, J. M. L., F. Struijs, and P. Whaley. 2022. “The Methodological Rigour of Systematic Reviews in Environmental Health.” Critical Reviews in Toxicology 52 (3): 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2022.2082917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., D. Altman, I. Simera, and E. Wager. 2014. Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User’s Manual. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ojFEBAAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., L. Shamseer, M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, A. Liberati, M. Petticrew, P. Shekelle, et al. 2015. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement.” Systematic Reviews 4 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., L. Shamseer, D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, M. Sampson, A. C. Tricco, F. Catalá-López, et al. 2016. “Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.” PLOS Medicine, 13 (5): e1002028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin, A. S., S. H. Cheng, J. D. Jackson, J. Eales, I. Envall, S. J. Fada, G. K. Frampton, et al. 2022. “Standards of Conduct and Reporting in Evidence Syntheses That Could Inform Environmental Policy and Management Decisions.” Environmental Evidence 11 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00269-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethlefsen, M. L., S. Kirtley, S. Waffenschmidt, A. P. Ayala, D. Moher, M. J. Page, J. B. Koffel, et al. 2021. “PRISMA-S: An Extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 109 (2): 174–200. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teytelman, L., A. Stoliartchouk, L. Kindler, and B. L.Hurwitz. 2016. “Protocols.io: Virtual Communities for Protocol Development and Discussion.” PLOS Biology 14 (8): e1002538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., V. Welch, M. Li, L. Yao, J. Littell, H. Li, N. Yang, et al. 2021. “The Methodological and Reporting Characteristics of Campbell Reviews: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 17 (1): e1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West, R. 2020. “An Online Paper Authoring Tool (PAT) to Improve Reporting of, and Synthesis of Evidence from, Trials in Behavioral Sciences.” Health Psychology 39 (9): 846–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, P. 2020. “Generic Protocol for Environmental Health Systematic Reviews Based on COSTER Recommendations v1”, Protocols.io. ZappyLab, Inc. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.biktkcwn
   Google Scholar
• Whaley, P., S. W. Edwards, A. Kraft, K. Nyhan, A. Shapiro, S. Watford, S. Wattam, et al. 2020. “Knowledge Organization Systems for Systematic Chemical Assessments.” Environmental Health Perspectives 128 (12): 125001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, P., E. Aiassa, C. Beausoleil, A. Beronius, G. Bilotta, A. Boobis, R. de Vries, et al. 2020. “Recommendations for the Conduct of Systematic Reviews in Toxicology and Environmental Health Research (COSTER).” Environment International 143: 105926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, P., R. Garside, and J. F. Eales. 2020. “A general protocol for pilot-testing the screening stage of a systematic review (manual) v1”, protocols.io ZappyLab, Inc. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bkc9ksz6
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. A., P. Whaley, A. S. Persad, I. L. Druwe, J. S. Lee, M. M. Taylor, A. J. Shapiro, et al. 2022. “Assessing Author Willingness to Enter Study Information into Structured Data Templates as Part of the Manuscript Submission Process: A Pilot Study.” Heliyon 8 (3): e09095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar