Motor Assessment for Unaided and Aided Augmentative Communication

NOTES

• Coppola S: Current Practice of Occupational Therapists in Augmentative Communication, thesis. University of North Carolina at Chape Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty J: The effects of sign characteristics on sign acquisition and retention: An integrative review of the literature. Augment Ahem Commun 1:108–121, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman L, Starks-Wiison P, Bornstcin H: Rcsulls of a national survey of sign language problems in special education. Menl Retard 16:104–106, 1978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rciehle J, Williams W, Ryan S: Selecting signs for the formulation of an augmentative communicative modality. J Assoc Sev Hand 6(l):48-56, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis R, Rciehle J, Williams W, ct al.: Motoric factors influencing the selection of vocabulary for sign production programs. TASH Journal 7:20–31, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe W: Sign Language Structure. Silver Spring, MD, Linstok Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn M: Pre-Sign Language Motor Skills, Tucson, AZ, Communication Skill Builders, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Herst J, Wolfe S. Jargansen G, et al.: S.E.E.D. Fine Motor Profile. Tacoma, WA, Sewall Early Education Development Program, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery P, Richter E: Sensory Integration for Developmentally Disabled Children: A Handbook. Los Angeles, CA, Western Psychological Services, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein R: Prehension Assessment. Madison, WS, Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Folio MR, Fewel R: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards. Allen, TX, DLM Teaching Resources, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Roach E, Kephart N: Purdue Perceptual Motor Survey. New York, Charles E. Merrill, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Hainsworth P., Scqueland M: Meeting Street School Screening Test. Providence, RI, Crippled Children and Adults of Rhode Island, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Ayrcs A J: Southern California Tests of Sensory Integration. Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Ayrcs Ai: Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Berges J, Lczine I: The imitation of gestures. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 18, London, England, The Spastics Society Medical Education and Information Unit in Association with William Heincmann Medical Books Ltd, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite C, St. Louis K: Communication Programming for the Severely Handicapped: Vocal and Non-Vocal Strategies. Houston, TX, College-Hill Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe W, Casterline D, Croncberg C: Dictionary of American Sign Language (rev. ed.) Silver Spring, MD, Linstock Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson PA, Duncan PD: Sign learning and profoundly retarded people. Mem Retard 17:33–37, 1979.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson MA, McDade HL: A Total Communication Approach in an Interdisciplinary Infant Development Program. A paper presented at the American Spcech-Languagc-Hcaring AssociationConvention, Atlanta, GA, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Stremel-Campbell K, Cantrell D, Halle J: Manual signing as a language system and as a speech initiator for the nonverbal severely handicapped student, in Sontag E (ed): Educational Programmingfor the Severely and Profoundly Handicapped. Reston, VA, Council for Exceptional Children, Division on Mental Retardation, 1977, pp 335–347.
   Google Scholar
• Koselka MJ, Hannah EP, Gardner JO, et al.: Total Communication Therapy for a Non-Deaf Child and his Family. A paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, Washington, DC, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantareas MM, Oxman J, Webster CD: Iconicity: Effects on the acquisition of sign language by autistic and other dysfunctional children, in Siple P (ed): Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research. New York, Academic Press, 1978, pp 213–237.
   Google Scholar
• KJima ES, Bellugi U: The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Shane H, Wilbur R: Potential for expressive signing based on motor control. Sign Lang Stud 29:331–48, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Diener P: Motoric Aspects of Signs, unpublished paper. Clinical Center for the Study of Development and Learning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstcin H, Saulnier KL, Hamilton LD: The Comprehensive Signed English Dictionary. Washington, DC, Gallaudet College Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Skclly M, Schinsky L: Amer-lnd Gestural Code Based on Universal American Indian HandTalk. New York, Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc. 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty J, Daniloff J, Lloyd L: The effect of categorical presentation on Amer-lnd transparency. Augment Altern Commun 1:10–16, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty JE, Karlae OR, Lloyd L: Establishing the transparency of two gestural systems by mentally retarded adults. ASHA 24:834, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff TE, McMillcn MH: The transparency of Amcr-Ind and S.E.E. to untrained peers. ASHA 26:10, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy L: An Innovative Approach to the Development of Communication Skills for the SeverelySpeech Handicapped Cerebral Palsied Children, thesis. University of Nevada, Las Vegas,NV,"l977.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhcidcn G: Providing the child with a means to indicate, in Vandcrhcidcn G, Grillcy K (eds): Non-Vocal Communication Techniques and Aids for the Severely Phvsicallv Handicapped. Austin, TX, Pro-Ed, 1977, pp 20–76.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman F: Communication for the Speechless. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Goosscns C, Crain S: Augmentative Communication Assessment Resource. Lake Zurich, IL, Don Johnston Developmental Equipment Inc, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Althcide MR, Stowcrs S, Porter P, et a.: Augmentative Communication Forms, ClinicalCenter for the Study of Development and Learning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC,1985.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman C, Cook A, Meyers L: Assessing non-oral clients for assistive communication devices. J Speech Hear Disord 45:515–526, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goosscns C, Crain S: Eye-Gaze Communication Systems: Assessment and Intervention. A paper presented at Fifth Annual Southeast Nonspccch Communication Conference, Birmingham, AL, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Barker M, Hastings W, Flanagan K: The Control Evaluator and Training Kit: An Assessment Tool for Comparative Testing of Controls to Operate Assistive Devices. A paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, San Diego, CA, 1983.
   Google Scholar