Development and Reliability of the Research Version of the Minnesota Handwriting Test

References

• Glazer SM, Curry D. Word processing programs: survival tools for chil-dren with writing problems. Reading, Writing, Learn Disabil. 1988;4:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo JI, Bairstow PJ. Handwriting: difficulties and possible solutions. Sch Psychol Int. 1984;5:207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Stott DH, Henderson SE, Moyes FA. Diagnosis and remediation of hand-writing problems. Adapted Phys Activity Q. 1987;4:137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminsky S, Powers R. Remediation of handwriting difficulties: a practi-cal approach. Acad Ther 1981;17:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps J, Stempel L, Speck G. The Children's Handwriting Scale: a new diagnostic tool. J Educ Res. 1985;79:46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Eames K, Loewenthal K. Effects of handwriting and examiner's expertise on assessment of essays. J Soc Psychol. 1990;130:831–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock M. Handwriting versus word processed print: an investigation into teachers' grading of English language and literature essay work at 16+. J Com-puter Assisted Teaching. 1988;4:162–172.
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford P. Children's writing at 7 years: associations with handwriting on school entry and pre-school factors. Br J Educ Psychol. 1991;61:73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RL, Rust JO. Printing errors in the prediction of academic perfor-mance. J Sch Psychol. 1989;27:297–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer DC, Eaves LC, Richards R, Crichton JU. Name-printing as a test of developmental maturity. Dev Med Child Neurol.1975;17:486–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin N, Henderson SE. Two sides of the same coin: variations in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. Spec Educ Forward Trends. 1982;9:17–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simner ML. Printing errors in kindergarten and the prediction of academic performance. J Learn Disabil. 1982;15:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres LP. Measuring Scale for Handwriting: Gettysburg Edition. Cincin-nati, OH: Cincinnati Public Schools; 1915.
   Google Scholar
• Bezzi R. A standardized manuscript scale for grades 1, 2, and 3. J Educ Res. 1962;7:339–340.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman FN. A new handwriting scale. Elem Sch J. 1959;59:218–221.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen S, Hammill D. Test of Legible Handwriting. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• West P. American Handwriting Scale. New York, NY: A. N. Palmer; 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Zaner-Bloser. Zaner-Bloser Evaluation Scale: Manuscript. Columbus, OH: Author; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Feldt LS. The reliability of measures of handwriting quality. J Educ Psy-chol. 1962;6:288–292.
   Google Scholar
• Graham S. Measurement of handwriting skills: a critical review. Diagnos-tique. 1982;8:32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Otto W, Askov E, Cooper C. Legibility ratings for handwriting samples: a pragmatic approach. Percept Motor Skills. 1967;25: 638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helwig JJ, Johns JC, Norman JE, Cooper JO. The measurement of manu-script letter strokes. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976;9:231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston J. A Legibility Index: can handwriting be measured? Educ Rev. 1983;3:237–242.
   Google Scholar
• Alston J, Taylor J. Handwriting: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Nichols; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Hamstra-Bletz L, Blöte AW. Development of handwriting in primary school: a longitudinal study. Percept Motor Skills. 1990;70:759–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JC, Trap J, Cooper JO. Students' self-recording of manuscript letter strokes. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977;10:509–514.
   Google Scholar
• Blöte AW, Hamstra-Bletz L. A longitudinal study on the structure of hand-writing. Percept Motor Skills. 1991;72:983–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziviani J, Elkins J. An evaluation of handwriting performance. Educ Rev. 1984;36:249–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addy P, Wylie RE. The "right" way to write. Child Educ. 1973; 49: 253–254.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman J. Poor handwriting: who is referred? Am J Occup Ther. 1991; 45: 849-852.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey JD, Beck FW. Handwriting and the classroom experience: a reca-pitulation. Pointer. 1984; 29:29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schneck CM. Comparison of pencil-grip patterns in first graders with good and poor writing skills. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:701–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbe WB, Milone MN, Wasylyk TM. Manuscript is the "write" start. Acad Titer. 1983; 18:397–405.
   Google Scholar
• Thurber DN. Write on with continuous stroke point. Acad Ther. 1983; 18: 389–395.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps J, Stempel L. The Children's Handwriting Evaluation Scale for Manuscript Writing. Reading Improvement. 1988; 25:247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps J, Stempel L. The Children's Handwriting Evaluation Scale for Manuscript Writing. Dallas, TX: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Chil-dren; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres A. Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Stennett RG, Smythe PC, Hardy M, Wilson HR. Developmental trends in letter-printing skill. Percept Motor Skills. 1972; 34:183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins BL, Schutte RC, Garton KL. The effects of access to a playroom on the rate and quality of printing and writing of first and second-grade students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971; 4:77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Graham S, Boyer-Shick K, Tippets E. The validity of the handwriting sub-scale from the Test of Written Language. J Educ Res. 1989; 82:166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziviani J. Some elaborations on handwriting in 7 to 14 year olds. Percept Motor Skills. 1984; 58:535–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S. The reliability, validity, and utility of three handwriting mea-surement procedures. J Educ Res. 1986; 79:373–380.
   Google Scholar
• Burnhill P, Hartley J, Lindsey D. Lined paper, legibility and creativity. In: Hartley J, ed. The Psychology of Written Communication. London, England: Ko-gan Page; 1983: 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hill DS, Gladden MA, Porter JT, Cooper JO. Variables affecting transition from wide-spaced to normal-spaced paper for manuscript writing. J Educ Res, 1982; 76:50–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung EK, Treblas PV, Hill DS, Cooper JO. Space size and accuracy of first grade students' manuscript writing. J Educ Res. 1980; 73:79–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggoner J, LaNunziata LI, Hill DS, Cooper JO. Space size and accuracy of kindergarten and first grade students' manuscript handwriting. J Educ Res. 1981;74:182–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viviani P. Terzuolo CA. The organization of movement in handwriting and typing. In: Butterworth B, ed. Language Production. 2. London, England: Aca-demic Press; 1983: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ. Evaluating Clinical Change: Strategies for Occupational and Physical Therapists. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Abacus Concepts. Statview 512+ (Computer program). Calabasas, CA: BrainPower; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lilly L. The Effects of Service Delivery Models on Children's Handwriting. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago;1987. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Krupka M. The Effects of Two Writing Aids on the Handwriting of Two Children with Learning Disabilities. Tacoma, WA: University of Puget Sound;1991. Thesis.
   Google Scholar