Processes Underlying Clumsiness:

References

• Laszlo JI. Child perceptual motor development: normal and abnormal de-velopment of skilled behaviour. In: Hauert CA, ed. Developmental Psychology: Cognitive, Perceptuo-Motor, and Neuropsychological Perspectives. Holland: El-sevier Science Publishers; 1990:273–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres AJ, Mailloux Z, Wendler C. Developmental dyspraxia: Is it a unitary function? Occup Ther J Res. 1985;7:93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Gubbay S, Ellis E, Walton J, Court S. Clumsy children: a study of apraxic and agnosic defects in 21 children. Brain. 1965;88:295–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton S. Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: W.W. Norton;1937.
   Google Scholar
• Dare M, Gordon N. Clumsy children: A disorder of perception and motor organisation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1970;12:178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellen T, Geuze R. Motor response processing in clumsy children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1988;29:489–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gubbay S. Clumsy children in normal schools. Med J Aust. 1975;1:233–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall D. Clumsy children. Br Med J. 1988;296:375–376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hulme C, Lord R. Review: Clumsy Children-A review of recent research. Child Care Health Dev. 1986; 12:257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilfoyle E, Grady A, Moore J. Children Adapt. New Jersey: Charles B. Slack; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Densam JF, Nuthall GA, Bushnell J, Horn J. Effectiveness of a sensory in-tegrative therapy program for children with perceptual-motor deficits. J Learn Disabil. 1989;22:221–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphries TW, Snider L, McDougall B. Clinical Evaluation of the effec-tiveness of sensory integrative and perceptual motor therapy in improving sensory integrative function in children with learning disabilities. Occup Ther J Res. 1993;13:163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries TW, Wright M, McDougall B, Vertez J. The efficacy of sensory integration therapy for children with learning disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pe-diatr. 1991;10:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries TW, Wright M, Snider L, McDougall B. A comparison of the effectiveness of sensory integration therapy and perceptual motor training in treat-ing children with learning disabilities. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1992;13:31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Law M, Miller J, Schaffer R, Macnab J. The effect of a sen-sory integration program on academic achievement, motor performance, and self esteem in children identified as learning disabled: results of a clinical trial. Occup Ther J Res. 1991;11:155–176.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ. Research in sensory integration: Empirical perceptions and progress. In:Fisher AG, Murray EA, Bundy AC, eds. Sensory integration theory and practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1991: 387–399.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Polatajko HJ, Schaffer R, Miller J, Macnab J. The impact of heter-ogeneity in a clinical trial: Motor outcomes after sensory integration therapy. Oc-cup Ther J Res. 1991;11:177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Walton J, Ellis E, Court S. Clumsy Children: Developmental apraxia and agnosia. Brain. 1962;85:603–612.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston 0, Short H, Crawford J. Poorly coordinated children: A survey of 95 cases. Child Care Health Dev. 1987;13: 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson S, Hall D. Concomitants of clumsiness in young school chil-dren. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982;24:448–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord R, Hulme C. Patterns of rotary pursuit performance in clumsy and normal children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988;29:691–701.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe TR. Abnormal clumsiness in children: a defect of motor program-ming? Child Care Health Dev. 1991;17:283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Meulen J, Denier Van Der Gon J, Gielen C, Gooskens R, Wil-lemse J. Visuo-motor performance of normal and clumsy children 1: Fast and goal directed movements with and without visual feedback. Del, Med Child Neurol. 1991;33: 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Meulen J, Denier Van Der Gon J, Gielen C, Gooskens R, Wil-lemse J. Visuo-motor performance of normal and clumsy children 2: Arm tracking with and without visual feedback. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33: 118–129.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme C, Biggerstaff A, Moran G, McKinlay I. Visual, kinaesthetic and cross-modal judgements of length by normal and clumsy children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982;24:461–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme C, Smart A, Moran G, McKinlay I. Visual, kinaesthetic and cross-modal judgements of length by clumsy children: A comparison with young nor-mal children. Child Care Health Dev. 1984;10:117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Gliner J. Visual and motor sequencing in normal and clumsy children. Occup Ther J Res. 1986;8:89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lord R, Hulme C. Perceptual judgements of normal and clumsy children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29:250–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien V, Cermak S, Murray E. The relationship between visual-per-ceptual motor abilities and clumsiness in children with and without learning dis-abilities. Am J Occup Ther. 1988;42:359–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Cermak S, O'Brien V. The relationship between form and space perception, constructional abilities, and clumsiness in children. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;44:623–627.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Stott DH, Moyes FA, Henderson SE. The Henderson revision of the Test of Motor Impairment. San Antonio: Psychological corporation; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo J, Bairstow P, Bartrip J. A new approach to the treatment of percep-tuo-motor dysfunction: previously called "clumsiness." Supportive Learning. 1988;3: 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo J, Bairstow P. Perceptual-motor behaviour: Developmental assess-ment and therapy. London: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston Ltd; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo J, Bairstow P. Kinaesthetic sensitivity test. Perth: Senkit Ltd; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe TR, Glencross DJ. Information processing deficits in clumsy chil-dren. Aus J Psychol. 1986;38:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle AJR, Elliot JM, Connolly KJ. Measurement of kinaesthetic sensitiv-ity. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986;28:188–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairstow P, Laszlo JI. Measurement of Kinaesthetic Sensitivity: A reply to Doyle and colleagues. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986;28:194–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lord R, Hulme C. Kinaesthetic sensitivity of normal and clumsy children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29:720–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot J, Connolly K, Doyle A. Development of kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988;30:80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoare D, Larkin D. Kinaesthetic abilities of clumsy children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33:671–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan MR. Planning and controlling simple movements. In: Smythe MM, Wing AM eds. The Psychology of Human Movement. London: Academic Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Adams JA. A closed loop theory of motor learning. J Motor Behav. 1971;3:11–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein N. The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Per-gamon; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Re-view. 1975;82:225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodgold-Edwards SA, Cermalc SA. Integrating motor control and motor learning concepts with neuropsychological perspectives on apraxia and develop-mental dyspraxia. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44:431–439.
   Google Scholar
• Notterrnan JM, Tuffano DR. Variables influencing outflow-inflow inter-pretations of tracking performance: Predictability of target motion, transfer func-tion and practice. J Exp Psychol. 1980;6:85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmach GE. Motor control and motor learning: A closed loop perspec-tive. In: Kelso JAS ed. Human Motor Behaviour: An introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• McCarron LT. McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development. Dallas: Common Market Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Stein JF. Clumsy children. Br Med J. 1988;296:717.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe TR. Abnormal clumsiness in children: a defect of motor program-ming? Child Care Health Dev. 1992;18:283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Hindley CB, Filliozat AM, Klackenberg G, Nicolet-Meister P, Sand AA. Differences in age of walking in five European longitudinal samples. Hum Biol. 1966;38:364–379.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting BB, Edwards CP. Children of Different Worlds: The Formation of Social Behaviour 1st edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe T. Pediatric assessments: A survey of their use by occupational therapists in northwestern school systems. Occup Ther J Res. 1989;9:273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewko J. Current practices in evaluating motor behaviour of disabled chil-dren. Am I Occup Ther. 1976;30:413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker R, Wallen M. Occupational therapy practice with children with perceptual motor dysfunction: Findings of a questionnaire. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Occupational Therapists 15th Federal Conference: Ade-laide; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Yack E. Sensory Integration: A survey of its use in the clinical setting. Can J Occup Ther. 1989;56:229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Rodger S. A survey of assessments used by paediatric occupational thera-pists. Aus Occup Titer J. 1994;41:137–142.
   Google Scholar