Differences in Hebrew Handwriting Skills Between Israeli Children in Second and Third Grade

References

• Laszlo J I, Bairstow P J, Bartrip J. A new approach to treatment of perceptual-motor dysfunction: previously called clumsiness. Support for Learning. 1988; 3: 35–40
   Google Scholar
• Sasson R, Nimmo-Smith I, Wing A M. Analysis of children's penholds. Graphonomics, H SR Koa, G P Van-Gallen, R Hoosain. North Holland, Oxford 1986
   Google Scholar
• Graham S, Weintraub N. A review of handwriting research: progress and prospects from 1980–1994. Educational Psychology Review. 1994; 8: 7–87
   Google Scholar
• Modlinger I. Disorders of written language: diagnosis and remedial teaching. Poalim, LTD, Tel-Aviv 1992, (In Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Levine M D. Academic skills. Developmental variation and learning disorders, M D Levine. Educators Publishing Service Inc, Cambridge, MA 1987
   Google Scholar
• Schneck C M, Henderson A. Descriptive analysis of the developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in non dysfunctional children. AmJOccup Ther 1990; 44: 893–900
   Google Scholar
• Maeland A F, Karlsdottir R. Development of reading, spelling and writing skills from third to sixth grade in normal and dysgraphic school children. Development of graphic skills: research perspectives and educational implications, J Wann, N Wing, N Sovik. London Academic Press Limited. 1991
   Google Scholar
• Anderson D W. Handwriting research: movement and quality. Elementary English. 1965; 42: 45–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blote A W, Bletz L H. A longitudinal study on the structure of handwriting. Percept Mot Skills. 1991; 72: 983–994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziviani J, Elkins J. An evaluation of handwriting performance. Educ Rev 1984; 36: 249–261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydorn B L. Treatment versus non-treatment in reduction of symbol reversals by first grade children. Percept Mot Skills. 1984; 59: 36–38
   Google Scholar
• Mojet J. Characteristics of the developing Handwriting skill in the elementary education. Development of graphic: research perspectives and educational implications, J Wann, N Wing, N Sovik. London Academic Press Limited. 1991
   Google Scholar
• Lester D, Werling N, Heinle N H. Differences in handwriting as a function of age. Percept Mot Skills. 1983; 57: 738–741
   Google Scholar
• Anderson D W. What makes writing legible?. Elementary School Journal. 1969; 69: 365–369
   Google Scholar
• Weil M J, Amundson S J C. Relationship between visuo-motor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 982–988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman L J, Wedell K. Perceptual motor abilities and reversal errors in children's handwriting. J Learn Dis 1972; 5: 321–325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziviani J, Is Jay A, Chart D. Handwriting: A perceptual motor disturbance in children with mgelomeningocele. Occup Ther J Res 1990; 10: 12–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps J, Stempel L. The children's handwriting evaluation scale for manuscript writing. Reading Improvement. 1988; 25: 247–255
   Google Scholar
• Tseng M H, Murray E A. Differences in perceptual-motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occup Ther J Res 1994; 14: 19–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussounis S H, Gaussen T H, Stratton P. A two year follow up study of children with motor coordination problems identified at school entry age. Child Care Health Development. 1987; 13: 377–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger V W, Rutberg J. Relationship of finger function to beginning writing; Application to diagnosis of writing disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992; 34: 198–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine M D, Oberklaid F, Meltzer L. Developmental output failure: a study of low productivity in school aged children. Pediatr. 1981; 67: 18–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger V W, Colwell S. Relationships between neurodevelopmental and educational findings in children aged 6 to 17 years. Pediatr. 1985; 75: 697–702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tseng M H, Cermak S A. The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance. AmJ Occup Then 1993; 47: 919–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovick N. Development cybernetics of handwriting and graphic behavior. Universitetsforlaget, Boston, MA 1975
   Google Scholar
• Rubin N, Henderson S E. Two sides of the same coin: variations in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. Special Education: Forward Trends. 1983; 9: 17–24
   Google Scholar
• Sovik N. The effects of a remedial tracking program on the writing performance of dysgraphic children. Scand J Educ Res. 1984; 28: 129–147
   Google Scholar
• Berninger V, Yates C, Rutberg J, Remy E, Abbott R. Lower level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading Writing: Interdiscipline Journal. 1992; 4: 257–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddes W H, Edgell D. Learning disabilities and brain function: a neuro-psychologicsl approach. Springier Verlag, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Erez N, Yochman A, Parush S. The Hebrew Handwriting Evaluation. Hebrew University, School of Occupational Therapy, Jerusalem, Israel 1996
   Google Scholar
• Devash L, Levi M, Traub R, Shapiro M. Reliability of the Hebrew Handwriting Evaluation. Hebrew University, School of Occupational Therapy, Jerusalem, Israel 1995, (Unpublished)
   Google Scholar
• Ayres A J. Sensory Integration and Praxis Test manual. Western psychological Services, Los Angeles 1989
   Google Scholar
• Beery K E. The Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration3rd ed. Modern Curriculum Press, Cleveland 1989
   Google Scholar
• Bruininks R. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 1978
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen A, Teulings H. Constancy in stationary and progressive handwriting. Ada Psychol. 1983; 54: 179–196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornhill H, Case-Smith J. Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. 1996; 50: 732–739
   Google Scholar