Evaluation of Powered Mobility Use in Home and Community Environments

References

• Becker R. D. Recent developments in child psychiatry-clinical paediatrics liaison consultation. (I) The restrictive emotional and cognitive environment reconsidered: A redefinition of the concept of therapeutic restraint. Israel Annals of Psychiatry & Related Disciplines 1975; 13: 239–258
   Google Scholar
• Berry E. T., McLaurin S. E., Sparling J. W. Parent/caregiver perspectives on the use of power wheelchairs. Pediatric Physical Therapy 1996; 8: 146–150
   Google Scholar
• Bottos M., Biolcati C., Brunati E., Merlo V., Pullini F., Sciuto L., Ruggeri C. Powered assistive devices and independence in severely disabled children: A study of 29 cases with tetraplegia. Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the New Millennium, C. Bühler, H. Knops. IOS Press, Ohmsha 1999; 362–366
   Google Scholar
• Breed A., Ibler I. The motorized wheelchair: New freedom, new responsibility and new problems. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1982; 24: 366–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker R. P., Lewis M. Making the world work with microcomputers: A learning prosthesis for handicapped infants. Exceptional Children 1982; 49: 163–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton A., Davis W. Optimizing the involvement and performance of children with physical impairments in movement activities. Pediatric Exercise Science 1992; 4: 236–248
   Google Scholar
• Butler C. Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviors of very young children with locomotor disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1986; 28: 325–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C. High tech tots: Technology for mobility, manipulation, communication, and learning in early childhood. Infants and Young Children 1988; 1: 66–73
   Google Scholar
• Butler C., Okamoto G. A., McKay T. M. Powered mobility for very young disabled children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1983; 25: 472–474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook A. M., Hussey S. M. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice, (2nd ed.). Mosby Yearbook Publishing, St Louis, MO 2002
   Google Scholar
• Darrah J., Law M., Pollock N. Family-centered functional therapy-A choice for children with motor dysfunction. Infants and Young Children 2001; 13: 79–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darrah J., Wessel J., Nearingburg P., O'Connor M. Evaluation of a community fitness program for adolescents with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy 1999; 11: 18–23
   Google Scholar
• Davis W., Burton A. Ecological task analysis: Translating movement theory into practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 1991; 8: 154–177
   Google Scholar
• Deitz J., Jaffe K., Wolf L., Massagli T., Anson D. Pediatric power wheelchairs: Evaluation of function in the home and school environments. Assistive Technology 1991; 3: 24–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furumasu J., Guerette P., Tefft D. The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children. Technology and Disability 1996; 5: 41–48
   Google Scholar
• Kibele A. Occupational therapy's role in improving the quality of life for persons with cerebral palsy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1989; 43: 371–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M., Darrah J., Pollock N., King G., Rosenbaum P., Russell D., Palisano R., Harris S., Armstrong R., Watt J. Family-Centred Functional Therapy for children with cerebral palsy: An emerging practice model. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1998; 18: 83–102
   Google Scholar
• Miles-Tapping C. Power wheelchairs and independent life styles. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1997; 10: 137–145
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson K., Christoffersen M. Psychosocial aspects on technical aidshow does independent motility affect the psychosocial and intellectual development of children with physical disabilities?. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering. 1984; 282–286
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B., Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology 1993; 5: 36–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pope P. M., Bowes C. E., Booth E. Postural control in sitting the SAM system: Evaluation of use over three years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1994; 36: 241–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney L. G., Watkins M. P. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Prentice Hall, Toronto 1993
   Google Scholar
• Richardson S. People with cerebral palsy talk for themselves. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1972; 14: 524–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J., Gamble J. G., Medeiros J. M., Burgos A., Haskell W. L. Energy cost of walking in normal children and in those with cerebral palsy: Comparison of heart rate and oxygen uptake. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 1989; 9: 276–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleien S. J., Germ P. A., McAvoy L. H. Inclusive community leisure services: Recommended professional practices and barriers encountered. Therapeutic Recreation Journal 1996; 30: 260–273
   Google Scholar
• Tefft D., Guerette P., Furumasu J. Cognitive predictors of young children's readiness for powered mobility. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1999; 41: 665–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg G. Predictors of successful powered mobility control. Childhood powered mobility: Developmental, technical, and clinical perspectives. Proceedings of the RESNA First Northwest Regional Conference., M. K. Jaffe. RESNA, Seattle, WA 1987; 70–104
   Google Scholar
• Wiart L., Darrah J. Changing Philosophical Perspectives on the management of children with physical disabilities: Their effect on the use of powered mobility. 2002, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Wolf L. S., Massagli T. L., Jaffe K. M., Deitz J. Functional assessment of the Joncare Hi-Lo Master power wheelchair for children. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1991; 11: 57–72
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICIDH-2. International classification of functioning and disability. Beta-2 draft. Short version. World Health Organization, Geneva 1999
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF. International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• York J. Mobility methods selected for use in home and community environments. Physical Therapy 1989; 69: 736–747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zazula J. L., Foulds R. A. Mobility device for a child with phocomelia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1983; 64: 137–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar