Power Therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry

References

• Bandler R, Grinder J. The Structure of Magic: I. Science and Behavior, OxfordUK 1975
   Google Scholar
• Sharpley C F. Research findings on Neurolinguistic Programming: nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1987; 34: 103–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traumatic Stress Forum. The traumatic stress network, 2004, http://www.fsu.edu/t˜rauma/trauma.html, accessed 20 September 2004
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro F. Efficacy of the Eye Movement Desensitization procedure in the treatment of traumatic memories. Journal of Traumatic Stress 1989; 2: 199–223
   Google Scholar
• Callahan R J, Callahan J. Thought Field Therapy: aiding the bereavement process. Death and trauma: the traumatology of grieving, C R Figley, B E Bride. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia 1997
   Google Scholar
• Craig G. EFT: Emotional Freedom Techniques: a universal aid to healing 1997, Website: http://www.emofree.com, accessed 30 August 2004
   Google Scholar
• Gerbode F. Beyond psychology: an introduction to metapsychology 2nd edn. IRM Press, Palo Alto, CA 1989
   Google Scholar
• French G, Harris C. Traumatic Incident Reduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1998
   Google Scholar
• Fleming T. Unstress for success 2002, Website: http://tat-intl.com, accessed 30 August 2004
   Google Scholar
• Grinder J, Bandler R. The Structure of Magic: II. Science and Behavior, OxfordUK 1976
   Google Scholar
• Callahan R J. The impact of Thought Field Therapy on heart rate variability. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2001; 57: 1153–1170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan R J. Raising and lowering of heart rate variability: some clinical findings of Thought Field Therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2001b; 57: 1175–1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudiano B A, Herbert J D. Can we really tap our problems away? A crucial analysis of Thought Field Therapy. Skeptical Inquirer 2000; 24: 29–33, 36
   Google Scholar
• Kline J P. Heart rate variability does not tap putative efficacy of Thought Field Therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2001; 57: 1187–1192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr J M. Sakai et al. is not an adequate demonstration of TFT effectiveness. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2001; 57: 1229–1235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally R M. Tertullian's motto and Callahan's method. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2001; 57: 1171–1174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig G. Emotional Freedom Techniques: the manual (revised edn). Author, Sea Ranch, CA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Wells S, Polglase K, Andrews H, Carrington P, Baker A H. Evaluation of a meridian-based intervention, Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT), for reducing specific phobias of small animals. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2003; 59: 943–966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite W L, Holder M D. Assessmentofthe Emotional Freedom Technique: an alternative treatment for fear. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 2003; 2: 20–26
   Google Scholar
• Devilly G J. The roles of popularised distraction during exposure and researcher allegiance during outcome trials. The Behavior Therapist 2001; 24: 18–21
   Google Scholar
• TIR. Traumatic Incident Reduction Association Website 2004, http://www.tir.org/metapsy/tirfaq.htm, accessed 5 August 2004
   Google Scholar
• Valentine P V, Smith T E. Evaluating Traumatic Incident Reduction therapy with female inmates: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Research on Social Work Practice 2001; 11: 40–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TAT. Tapas Acupressure Technique Website 2004, http://www.tat-intl.com/index.htm, accessed 6 August 2004
   Google Scholar
• Gallo F P. Reflections on active ingredients in efficient treatments of PTSD, Part 1. Traumatology e-Journal 1996; 2, http://www.fsu.edu/t˜rauma/art2v2i1.html, accessed 9 August 2004
   Google Scholar
• Devilly G J. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: a chronology of its development and scientific standing. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 2002; 1: 113–138
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro F. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: basic principles, protocols and procedures 2nd edn. Guilford, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Lohr J M, Lilienfeld S O, Tolin D F, Herbert J D. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): an analysis of specific and non-specific treatment factors. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1999; 13: 185–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally R J. On eye movements and animal magnetism: a reply to Greenwald's defense of EMDR. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1999; 13: 617–620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devilly G J, Spence S H. The relative efficacy and treatment distress of EMDR and a cognitive behavioral trauma treatment protocol in the amelioration of post traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1999; 13: 131–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Thordarson D S, Maxfield L, Fedroff I C, Lovell K, Ogrodniczuk O. Comparative efficacy, speed, and adverse effects of three PTSD treatments: exposure therapy, EMDR, and relaxation training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2003; 71: 330–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craske M G, Street L, Barlow D H. Instructions to focus upon or distract from internal cues during exposure treatment of agoraphobic avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1989; 27: 663–672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grayson J B, Foa E B, Steketee G. Habituation during exposure treatment: distraction versus attention focusing. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1982; 20: 323–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez B I, Craske M G. The effects of distraction during exposure to phobic stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1993; 31: 549–558
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro F. Stray thoughts. EMDR Network Newsletter 1991; 1: 1–2
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro F. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and anxiety disorders: clinical and research implications of an integrated psychotherapy treatment. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1999; 13: 35–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMDRIA. EMDR International Association Website 2004, http://www.emdria.com, accessed 19 August
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro F. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): evaluation of controlled PTSD research. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1996; 27: 209–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro F. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: basic principles, protocols, and procedures. Guildford, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Foa E B, Keane T M, Friedman M J. Effective treatments for PTSD: practice guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Guilford, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• SOT. Sudotherapay (SOT) Website 2004, http://www.talk.to/sudotherapay, accessed 6 August
   Google Scholar
• Pratkanis A R. How to sell a pseudoscience. Skeptical Inquirer July/August 1995; 19: 19–25
   Google Scholar
• Vonnegut K. Cat's cradle. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1963
   Google Scholar
• Vonnegut K. Wampeters, foma and granfalloons. Delta, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• EPI. Energy Psychology Interactive Website 2004, http://www.innersource.net/energy_psych/epi_research.htm, accessed 13 August
   Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 1957
   Google Scholar
• Turner M E, Pratkanis A R. A social identity maintenance model of groupthink. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998; 73: 210–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JStBT. Bias in human reasoning: causes and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum, HoveUK 1990
   Google Scholar
• EFT. Emotional Freedom Techniques Website 2004, http://www.emofree.com, accessed 13 August
   Google Scholar
• McNally RJ. EMDR and mesmerism: a comparative historical analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1999; 13: 225–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker D D, Pratkanis A R. Projection as an interpersonal influence tactic: the effects of the pot calling the kettle black. Journal of Anxiety DisordersPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001; 27: 1494–1507
   Google Scholar
• Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London 1959
   Google Scholar
• Popper K. Conjectures and refutations. Routledge and Keagan Paul, London 1963
   Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Field theory in social science. Field theory in social science: selected papers, D Cartwright. Harper Torchbooks, New York 1951
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld S O, Lynn S J, Lohr J M. Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. Guilford, New York 2002
   Google Scholar