Clinical decision support systems in psychiatry in the Information Age

REFERENCES

• England I, Stewart D, Walker S. Information technology adoption in health care: when organisations and technology collide. Australian Health Care Review 2000; 23: 176–150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauer C, Southon G, Dampney C. Fit, failure and the house of horrors: towards a configurational theory of is project failure. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems. December, 15th–17th1997. Association for Information Systems, Atlanta
   Google Scholar
• Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Getting research findings into practice: closing the gap between research and practice. An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. British Medical Journal 1998; 317: 465–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Lohr M. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use, MJ Field, KN Lohr. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1992
   Google Scholar
• Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Journal of American Medical Association 1999; 282: 1458–1465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood RA, Lapsley HM. Clinical practice guidelines: to what end?. Medical Journal of Australia 1997; 166: 592–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral M, Satomura Y, Honda M, Sato T. A design for decision making: construction and connection of knowledge bases for a diagnostic system in medicine. Medical Informatics 1993; 18: 307–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortliffe EH. Computer‐Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. Elsevier, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Field trials of medical decision aids: potential problems and solutions. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, PD Clayton. American Medical Informatics Association, Washington, DC 1991; 3–7
   Google Scholar
• Berner ES, Webster GD, Shugerman AA, et al. Performance of four computer‐based diagnostic systems. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330: 1792–1796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. A Guide to the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra 1998
   Google Scholar
• Yetton P, Southon G, Crain J. The impact of strategic conflict on the management of information technology in a hospital. Australian Health Review 1994; 17: 135–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oxman A, Thomson MA, Davis D, Haynes R. No magic bullets. A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995; 153: 1423–1431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq PA, Blom JA, Hasman A, Korsten HHM. GASTON: an architecture for the acquisition and execution of clinical guideline‐application tasks. Medical Informatics 2000; 25: 247–263
   Google Scholar
• Lobach DF, Hammond E. Computerised decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. American Journal of Medicine 1997; 102: 89–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder‐Halpern R. Assessing health care setting readiness for point of care computerized clinical decision support system innovations. Outcome Measurement for Nursing Practice 1999; 3: 118–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuerenberg BK. Clinical guidelines gain mobility. Health Data Management 2003; 11: 66–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eddy DM. Clinical policies and the quality of clinical practice. New England Journal of Medicine 1982; 307: 343–347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leape L. Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 1851–1857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florio T, Einfeld S, Levy F. Neural networks and psychiatry: candidate applications in clinical decision making. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1994; 28: 651–666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shea C. Psychiatric Interviewing: The Art of Understanding. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1998
   Google Scholar
• Faust D, Ziskin J. The expert witness in psychiatry and psychology. Science 1988; 241: 31–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klienmuntz B. Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: towards an integrative approach. Psychiatry Bulletin 1991; 107: 296–310
   Google Scholar
• Andrews G. The changing nature of psychiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 25: 453–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portelli C, Frydman F, Mises R. French classification of mental disorders in child and adolescent: presentation of an expert system, JPSY. Annales Medico‐Psychologiques 1989; 14: 1082–1086
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzi N, Riley R. Organisational Aspects of Health Informatics: Managing Technological Change. Springer‐Verlag, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Taylor‐Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1997; 157: 408–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan T. Computers and clinical decision making. Medical Journal of Australia 1991; 155: 287–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littlejohns P, Wyatt JC, Garvican L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. British Medical Journal 2003; 326: 860–863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers S. Software failure: management failure. Amazing stories and cautionary tales. International Journal of Information Management 1997; 17: 387–389
   Google Scholar
• Wong ET, Abendroth TW. Reaping the benefits of medical information systems. Academic Medicine 1996; 71: 353–357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, Grimshaw ME. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. British Medical Journal 2003; 326: 314–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room?. Journal of Family Practice 1995; 41: 241–244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Overhage J, Tierney W. Success factors for computerised clinical decision support. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 1999; 13: 67–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar