Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988–1998

References

• Andersen TF, Madsen M, Loft A. Regionale variationer i anvendelsen af hysterektomi. [Regional variations in the employment of hysterectomy]. Ugeskr Læger 1987; 149: 2415–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 549–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lepine LH, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Koonin LM, Morrow B, Kieke BA et al. Hysterectomy surveillance - United States 1980–1993. In: CDC Surveillance Summaries, August, 8, 1997. MMWR 1997; 46: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen M, Andersen TF, Roepstorff C, Jørgensen S, Keskimäki I, Johnsson M et al. Rates of surgery in the Nordic countries. Variation between and within the nations. NOMESCO 1994; 43. Copenhagen, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson K, Weenberg J, Hovind OB, Clifford P. Small- area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England and Norway. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1310–14.
   Google Scholar
• Keskimäki I, Aro S, Teperi J. Regional variation in surgical procedure rates in Finland. Scand J Soc Med 1994; 22: 132–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorma S, Teperi J, Hurskainen R, Keskimäki I, Kujansuu E. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987–1995 – a register based analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 770–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sills ES, Saini J, Applegate MS, McGee M, Gretz III HF. Supracervical and total abdominal hysterectomy trends in New York State: 1990–1996. J Urban Health 1998; 75: 903–10.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen TF, Madsen M, Loft A. Prævalens af hysterekto- merede kvinder i den danske befolkning i 1983. [Prevalence of hysterectomized women in the Danish population in 1983]. Ugeskr Læger 1987; 149: 615–19.
   Google Scholar
• Settnes A, Jorgensen T. Hysterectomy in a Danish cohort. Prevalence, incidence and socio-demographic characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 274–80.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen TF, Madsen M, Loft A. Validering af operation- soplysninger fra landspatientregisteret med særlig henblik på bestemmelse af regionale variationer i hysterektomirater. [Validity of surgical information from the Danish National Patient Register with particular attention to the analysis of regional variations in the hysterectomy rate]. Ugeskr Læger 1987; 149: 2420–2.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen LF, Lose G, Madsen H. Hysteroskopisk vejledt endometriedestruktion ved behandling af menoragi. [Hysteroscopically-guided destruction of the endometrium in the treatment of menorrhagia]. Ugeskr Læger 1992; 154: 770–3.
   Google Scholar
• Scott HM, Scott WG. Hysterectomy for nonmalignant conditions: cost to New Zealand society. N Z Med J 1995; 108 (1010): 423–6.
   Google Scholar
• Backe B, Lilleeng S. Hysterektomi i Norge. Datakvalitet og klinisk praksis. [Hysterectomy in Norway]. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1993; 113: 971–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sills ES, Saini J, Steiner CA, McGee M 3rd, Gretz HF 3rd. Abdominal hysterectomy practice patterns in the United States. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998; 63: 277–83.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgman SA, Dunn KM. Has endometrial ablation replaced hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding? National figures. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 531–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf F, Siedlecky S. Hysterectomy and endometrial ablation in New South Wales, 1981 to 1994–1995. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 37: 210–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgman SA. Increasing operative rates for dysfunctional uterine bleeding after endometrial ablation. Lancet 1994; 344: 893.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter A. Trends in gynaecological surgery. Lancet 1994; 344: 1367.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, Grant AM. A randomized comparison of medical and hysteroscopic management in women consulting a gynaecologist for treatment of heavy menstrual loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1360–6.
   Google Scholar
• Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Marazzi A. Hysterectomy and sex of the gynecologist. N Eng J Med 1985; 313: 1482.
   Google Scholar
• Domenighetti G, Casabianca A. Rate of hysterectomy is lower among female doctors and lawyer’s wives. Br Med J 1997; 314(7091): 1417.
   Google Scholar
• The Danish Medical Association. Personal message, June 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bickell NA, Earn JA, Garrett JM, Evans AT. A matter of opinion about hysterectomies: Experts’ and practicing community gynecologists’ rating of appropriateness. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 1125–8.
   Google Scholar
• Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Casabianca A, Gutzwiller F, Spinelli A, Pedrinis E et al. Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates. Lancet 1988; II: 1470–3.
   Google Scholar
• Heitmann BL. Forekomst og udvikling af overvægt blandt voksne danskere i alderen 30–60 ar. [10-year trends in overweight and obesity among Danish men and women aged 30–60 years]. Ugeskr Læger 1999; 161: 4380–4.
   Google Scholar
• Settnes A, Jorgensen T, Lange AP. Hysterectomy in Danish women: weight-related factors, psychological factors and lifestyle variables. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Helström L. Sexuality after hysterectomy. An analysis of women’s sexual lives before and after subtotal hysterectomy. Academic Dissertation. Uppsala University, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkku P Abdominal hysterectomy versus supravaginal uterine amputation with reference to carcinoma of the cervical stump, urinary symptoms and sexological aspects. Academic Dissertation. Turku, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Manyonda I, Stanton SL, Clarkson P, Robinson G. Bladder, bowel and sexual function after hysterectomy for benign conditions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 983–7.
   Google Scholar
• Johns A. Supracervical versus total hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 903–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lipscomb GH. Laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: Is it ever indicated? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 895–902.
   Google Scholar
• Wood C, Maher PJ. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 11: 111–36.
   Google Scholar
• Aberdeen Endometrial Ablation Trials Group. A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: outcome at four years. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 360–6.
   Google Scholar