67
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Vaginal birth of twins after a previous Cesarean section

Pages 171-174 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Wing DA, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after Cesarean section: selection and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999;42:836–48
  • Strong TH, Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Sarno AP. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:29–32
  • Miller D, Mullin P, Hou D, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:194–8
  • Odeh M, Tarazova L, Wolfson M, Oettinger M. Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:663–6
  • Wax R, Philput C, Mather J, Steinfeld JD, Ingardia CJ. Twin vaginal birth after cesarean. Conn Med 2000;64:205–8
  • Gilbert L, Saunders N, Sharp F. The management of multiple pregnancy in women with a lower-segment caesareanscar. Is a repeat caesarean section really the ‘safe’ option? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:1312–16
  • Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Lindmark G. Maternal morbidity and mortality associatedwithmultiplegestations. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:899–904
  • Brady K, Read J. Vaginal delivery of twins after previous cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1988;319:118–19
  • Gifford DS, MortonSC, FiskeM, Deesey J, Deeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:589–95
  • Lagrew DC, Adashek JA. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians’ rates, risk factors, and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:1207–14
  • Poma PA. Effect of departmental policieson cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:1013–18
  • Sachs BP, KobelinC, Castro M, Frigoletto F. The risks of lowering the cesarean-deliveryrate. NEngl JMed 1999;340:54–7
  • Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Earserling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:2411–16

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.