Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses

References

• Kramer MS, Olivier M, McLean FH, et al. Impact of intra-uterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome. Pediatrics 1990;86:707–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong CLD, Francis A, Van Geijn HP, et al. Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:86–9
   Google Scholar
• McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, et al. Birth weight in rela-tion to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1234–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison I, Olsen J. Weight-specific stillbirths and associated causes of death: an analysis of 765 stillbirths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:975–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Mul T, Mongelli M, et al. Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in antepartum stillbirths. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998:105:524–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Kramer MS. Differences in late fetal death rates in association with determinants of small for gestational age fetuses: population based cohort study. Br Med J 1998;316:1483–7
   Google Scholar
• Divon M, Guidetti DA, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: a prospective study of the diagnostic value of real-time sonography combined with umbilical artery flow velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol 1998;72:611
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz GS, Mehalek KE, Chitkara U. Doppler umbilical velocimetry in pred iction of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:742
   Google Scholar
• Reuwer P, Sijmons E, Rietman G. Intrauterine growth retarda-tion: prediction of perinatal distress by Doppler ultrasound. Lancet 1987;8556: 415
   Google Scholar
• Divon M, Girz B, Lieblich R. Clinical managment of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1523
   Google Scholar
• Baschat A, Weiner C. Umbilical artery Doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Intra-uterine Growth Restriction. ACOG Practice Bulletin, no. 12. ACOG, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP. Doppler ultrasonography in high risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divon M. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: clinical utility in high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assess-ment in high risk pregnancies (Cochrane review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2000. Oxford: Update Software
   Google Scholar
• Graziano E, Knox H, Ferrera B, et al. Is it time to reassess the risk for the growth retarded fetus with normal Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1734
   Google Scholar
• Burke G, Stuart B, Crowley P. Is intrauterine growth retarda-tion with normal umbilical artery blood flow a benign condi-tion? Br Med J 1990;300:1044
   Google Scholar
• Rochelson B, Schulman H, Farmakides G. The significance of absent end diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1213
   Google Scholar
• Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C. The development of abnor-mal heart rate pattern after absent end diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: analysis of risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168: 43
   Google Scholar
• Karsdop V, Van Vugt J, Kos tens P, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbili-cal artery. Lancet 1994;344:1664
   Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Defining altered fetal growth by second-trimester sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:1053–8
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini U, Todros T, Ferrazzi E, et al. Transverse fetal growth curves. A multicenter study. [Italian]. Minerva Ginecol 1986;38:873–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warsof SL, Cooper DJ, Little D, et al. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retar-dation. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fescina RH, Martell M, Martinez G, et al. Small for dates: evaluation of different diagnostic methods. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon NV, O'Connor TJ, Shear DM. Detection of intra-uterine fetal growth retardation with abdominal circumfer-ence and estimated fetal weight using cross-sectional growth curves. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18:685
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias F. The diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:293
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Kurjak A. Comparison between urinary estrogen assay and serial ultrasound cephalometry in assessment of fetal growth retardation. Br Med J 1972;2:336
   Google Scholar
• Crane JP, Kopta MM, Welt SI, et al. Abnormal fetal growth patterns: ultrasonic diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol 1977;50:205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Kirkinen P, Latin V. Biometric and dynamic ultra-sound assessment of small for dates infants: report of 260 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56: 281
   Google Scholar
• Persson PH, Grennert L, Gennser G. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by serial ultrasonic cephalometry. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1978;78:40
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt W, Hendrix HJ, Gauwerky J. et al. Diagnose der intruterinen wachstrumsretardierung durch die erweiterte ultras challb iometr ie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1982;42:543
   Google Scholar
• Sholl JS, Woo P, Rubin JM, et al. Intrauterine growth retarda-tion: risk detection for fetuses of unknown gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:709
   Google Scholar
• Varma TR. A comparison of serial cephalometry and maternal urinary estrogen secretion in assessing fetal prognosis. Aust NZ J Obstet Gyneco11973;13:191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HL, Miller JM, Gabert HA, et al. Ultrasonic recogni-tion of small for gestational age fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69:631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Rutherford SE, et al. Amniotic fluid index measurement during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1987;32: 601–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar