Predictive value of two-dimensional and three-dimensional multiplanar ultrasound evaluation of the cervix in preterm labor

References

• Hall MH, Danielian P, Lamont RF. The importance of preterm birth. In Elder MG, Lamont RF, Romero R, eds. Preterm Labor. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997: 1�28
   Google Scholar
• Blondel B, Du Mauzaubrun C, Bréart O. Enquete nationale p�rinatale 1995. Rapport de fin d��tude. Paris: Edition INSERM, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews MS. Final Data for 1997: National Vital Statistics Reports, vol 47, no. 18. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews MS. Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1996; Monthly Vital Statistics Report, vol 46, no. 11; Suppl. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Keirse MJNC. An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. Am J Perinatol 1989;6:226�33
   Google Scholar
• Creasey RK, Merkatz IR. Prevention of preterm birth: clinical opinion. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76( Supp11):25–45
   Google Scholar
• Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, et al. Warning symptoms, uterine contractions, and cervical examination findings in women at risk for preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:748�54
   Google Scholar
• McLean M, Walters WAW, Smith R. Prediction and early diagnosis of preterm labor: a critical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:209�25
   Google Scholar
• Shiono PH, Klebanoff MA. A review of risk scoring for preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 1993;20:107–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jams JD, Paraskos J, Landon MB, et al. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:40�6
   Google Scholar
• Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:956�64
   Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Van Den Hof M, Armson BA, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: singleton and twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:357–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Boozarjomehri F, Masakowski Y, et al. Can a 'snapshot' sagittal view of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography predict active preterm labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:990–5
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo O, Capponi A, Arduini D, et al. The value of fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions and of ultrasonographicexamination of the uterine cervix in predict-ing premature delivery for patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1146–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Malagrida L, et al. Evaluating the risk of preterm delivery: a comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:196–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner H, Staudach A, Spitzer D, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology: technique, possibili-ties and limitations. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1773–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber O. Volume scanning in the evaluationof fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:222–7
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. Three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:219–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riccabona M, Pretorius DH, Nelson TR, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound: display modalities in obstetrics Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:157–67
   Google Scholar
• Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using three-dimensional ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:941–52
   Google Scholar
• Needleman L. Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using three-dimensional ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20: 941–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging in obstetrics: present and future applications. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:391–408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bega G, Kuhlman K, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Application of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the fetal heart. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:307–13
   Google Scholar
• Hoesli IM, Surbek DV, Tercanli S, et al. Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy com-pared to conventional 2D-sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:115–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, et al. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in preg-nancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:351–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Heer I, Fuchshuber S, et al. Sonographic cervical volumetry in higher order multiple gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:346–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar