References
- O'Connell MP, Lindow SW. Trends in obstetric care in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynecol 2000;20:592–3
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induc-tion of Labor. ACOG Technical Bulletin 217. Washington, DC; ACOG, 1995
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Annual statistical returns 1997/98. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2000
- Yudkin P, Frumar AM, Turnbull AC. A retrospective study of induction of labor. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979;86:257–65
- Smith LP, Nagourney BA, McLean FH, et at. Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:579–85
- Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1690–7
- Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spon-taneous labor: a case control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:47–52
- Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to Cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecu-tive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 628–33
- Robson S, Pridmore B, Dodd J. Outcomes of induced labor. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:19
- Leitch CR, Walker JJ. The rise in Cesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:621–6
- Bell JS, Campbell DM, Graham WJ, et at. Do Cesarean complications explain high Cesarean rates among women over 30? A retrospective analysis. Br Med J 2001;322:894–5
- Roberts CL, Tracy S, Peat B. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study. Br Med J 2000;321:137–41
- King JF. Obstetric interventions among private and public patients. Br Med J 2000;321:125–6