Comparing ambulatory spot urine protein/creatinine ratios and 24-h urine protein measurements in normal pregnancies

References

• BarronWM. Hypertension. In BarronWM, Lindheimer MD, eds.Medical DisordersDuring Pregnancy, 3rd edn. St Louis,MO: Mosby, 2000:1�38
   Google Scholar
• Seshadri L, Venkataraman I. Hypertension in pregnancy: outcomes, proteinuric vs. nonproteinuric. J Reprod Med 1997; 42:88�90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos JGL, Martins-Costa SH, Mathias MM, et al. Urinary protein/creatinine ratio in hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens Pregn 1999;18:209�18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert M, Sepandj F, Liston RM, et al. Random protein� creatinine ratio for the quantitation of proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:893�5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in Pregnancy. Technical Bulletin no. 219. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Ferrazzani S, Caruso A, DeCarolis S, et al. Proteinuria and outcomes of 444 pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:366�71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PN, Hackett GA. The use of urinary albumin� creatinine ratios and calcium�creatinine ratios as screening tests for pregnancy-induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:745�9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boler L, Zbella EA, Gleicher N. Quantitationof proteinuria in pregnancy by the use of single voided urine samples. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:99�100
   Google Scholar
• Cheung CK, Lao T, Swaminathan R. Urinary excretion of some proteins and enzymes during normal pregnancy. Clin Chem 1989;35:1978�80
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg JM, Chang BS, Matarese RA, et al. Use of single voided urine samples to estimate quantitative proteinuria. N Engl J Med 1983;309:1543�6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazayeri A, Chez RA, Porter KB, et al. Urine protein dipstick measurements: a screen for a standard, 24-hour urine collection. J Reprod Med 1998;43:687�90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Ito M, Yoshimura T, et al. Usefulness of urinary microalbumin/creatinine ratio in predicting pregnancyinduced hypertension. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1992;37:99�103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadri KHM, Bernardini J, Greenberg A, et al. Assessment of renal function during pregnancy using a randomurine protein to creatinine ratio and Cockcroft�Gault formula. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;24:416�20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert M, Sepandj F, Liston RM, et al. Random protein�creatinine ratio for the quantitation of proteinuria in pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:893�5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saudan PJ, Brown MA, Farrell T, et al. Improved methods of assessing proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1159�64
   Google Scholar
• Schwab SJ, Shristensen RL, Dougherty K, et al. Quantitation of proteinuria by the use of protein-to-creatinine ratios in single urine samples. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:943�4
   Google Scholar
• Shaw AB, Risdon P, Lewis-Jackson JD. Protein creatinine index and albustix in assessment of proteinuria. Br Med J 1983;287:929�32
   Google Scholar
• Wright A, Steele P, Bennett JR, et al. The urinary excretion of albumin in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94:408�12
   Google Scholar
• Young RA, Buchanan RJ, Kinch RAH. Use of protein/ creatinine ratio of a single voided urine specimen in the evaluation of suspected pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Fam Pract 1996;42:385�9
   Google Scholar
• Evans W, Lensmeyer JP, Kirby RS, et al. Two-hour urine collection for evaluating renal function correlates with 24-hour urine collection in pregnant patients. J Matern-Fetal Med 2000;9:233�7
   Google Scholar
• Lindheimer MD, Gr�nfeld JP, Davison JM. Renal disorders. In BarronWM, Lindheimer MD, eds.Medical DisordersDuring Pregnancy, 3rd edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2000:39�70
   Google Scholar
• Uttendorfsky OT, Veersema D, Mooij PNM, et al. Protein/ creatinine ratio in the assessment of proteinuria during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1988;27:221�6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell SC, Halligan AWF, Martin A, et al. The role of observer error in antenatal dipstick proteinuria analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:1177�80
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez MH, Masaki DI, Mestman J, et al. Calcium/ creatinine ratio and microalbuminuria in the prediction of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:1452�5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar JGB, Campbell SK, Albano JDM, et al. Early prediction of pre-eclampsia by measurement of kallikrein and creatinine on a random urine sample. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103: 421�6
   Google Scholar
• Lindow SW, Davey DA. The variabilityof urinary protein and creatinine excretion in patients with gestational proteinuric hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:869�72
   Google Scholar
• Sibai BM. Prevention of preeclampsia: a big disappointment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;23:58�64
   Google Scholar
• Meyer NL, Mercer BM, Friedman SA, et al. Urinary dipstick protein: a poor predictor of absent or severe proteinuria. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:137�41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huikeshoven FJM, Zuijderhoudt FMJ. Hypocalciuria in hypertensive disorder in pregnancy and how to measure it. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;36:81�5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Larmon JE, et al. A 12-hour urine collection accurately assesses proteinuria in the hospitalized hypertensive gravida. J Perinat 1999;19:556�8
   Google Scholar