REFERENCES
- Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2): CD000331
- Morton SC, Williams MS, Keeler EB, et at. Effect of epidural analgesia for labor on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:1045–52
- Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, et at. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:851–8
- Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, et at. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labour. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:783–9
- Newton ER, Shroeder BC, Knape KG, et at. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:749–55
- Alexander JM, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, et at. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:516–20
- Impey L, MacQuillan K, Robson M. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:358–63
- Analgesia and Cesarean delivery rates. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 269. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:369–70
- Eberle RL, Arkoosh VA, Norris MC, et at. Epidural analgesia and uterine function [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:634
- Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, et at. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:234–8
- Viscomi CM. Epidural analgesia and uterine function [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:634–5
- Dewan DM, Cohen SE. Epidural analgesia and the incidence of cesarean section: time for a closer look [editorial]. Anesthesiology 1994;80:1189–92
- Satin AJ. Dystocia and the Augmentation of Labor. Technical Bulletin No. 218. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1995
- MacArthur C, Sherman AH, May A, et at. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techni-ques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:19–23