41
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: a case-control study

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 115-118 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2): CD000331
  • Morton SC, Williams MS, Keeler EB, et at. Effect of epidural analgesia for labor on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:1045–52
  • Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, et at. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:851–8
  • Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, et at. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labour. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:783–9
  • Newton ER, Shroeder BC, Knape KG, et at. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:749–55
  • Alexander JM, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, et at. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:516–20
  • Impey L, MacQuillan K, Robson M. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:358–63
  • Analgesia and Cesarean delivery rates. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 269. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:369–70
  • Eberle RL, Arkoosh VA, Norris MC, et at. Epidural analgesia and uterine function [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:634
  • Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, et at. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:234–8
  • Viscomi CM. Epidural analgesia and uterine function [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:634–5
  • Dewan DM, Cohen SE. Epidural analgesia and the incidence of cesarean section: time for a closer look [editorial]. Anesthesiology 1994;80:1189–92
  • Satin AJ. Dystocia and the Augmentation of Labor. Technical Bulletin No. 218. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1995
  • MacArthur C, Sherman AH, May A, et at. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techni-ques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:19–23

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.