A neuronal model of stroboscopic alternative motion

References

• Attneave F. Multistability in perception. Scientific American 1971; 225: 62–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsellino A, Carlini F, Riani M, Tuccio M T, DeMarco A, Penengo P, Trabucco A. Effects of visual angle on perspective reversal for ambiguous patterns. Perception 1982; 11: 263–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsellino A, DeMarco A, Allazetta A, Rinesi S, Bartolini B. Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 1972; 10: 139–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botwinick J. Husband and father-in-law: a reversible figure. Am. J. Psychol. 1961; 74: 312–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugelski B R, Alampay D A. The role of the frequency in developing perceptual sets. Can. J. Psychol. 1961; 15: 205–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmesin H, Arndt S. A neural network model for stroboscopic alternative motion. Biol. Cybern. 1996; 75: 239–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelis G C, Ohzawa I, Freeman R D. Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways. Trends in Neurosci. 1995; 18: 451–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarco A, Penengo P, Trabucco A, Borsellino A, Carlini F, Riani M, Tuccio M T. Stochastic models and fluctuations in reversal time of ambiguous figures. Perception 1977; 6: 645–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditzinger T, Haken H. Oscillations in the perception of ambiguous patterns. A model based on synergetics. Biol. Cybern. 1989; 61: 279–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditzinger T, Haken H. The impact of fluctuations on the recognition of ambiguous patterns. Biol. Cybern. 1990; 63: 453–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler W. Der rhythmische Wechsel in der Auffassung räumlich-zweideutiger geometrischer Figuren. Z. Sinnesphysiol. 1930; 61: 154–93
   Google Scholar
• Epstein W, Rock I. Perceptual set as an artifact of recency. Am. J. Psychol. 1960; 73: 214–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erke H, Gräser H. Reversibility of perceived motion: selective adaptation of the human visual system to speed, size and orientation. Vision Res. 1972; 12: 69–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girgus J J, Rock I, Egatz R. The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Perception Psychophys. 1977; 22: 550–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill W E. My wife and my mother in law. Puck 1915, 6 November
   Google Scholar
• Hock H S, Kelso J A S, Schöner G. Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. 1993; 19: 63–80
   Google Scholar
• Hoeth F. Bevorzugte Richtungen bei stroboskopischen Alternativbewegungen. Psychologische Beiträge 1968; 16: 494–527
   Google Scholar
• Hopfield J J. Neurons with graded response have computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1984; 81: 3088–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard I P. An investigation of an satiation process in the reversible perspective of revolving skeletal shapes. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 1961; 13: 19–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jastrow J. Fact and Fable in Psychology. Houghton Mifflin, New York 1900
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto A H, Anderson J A. A neural network model of multistable perception. Acta Psychol. 1985; 59: 35–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler W. Dynamics in Psychology. Liveright, New York 1940
   Google Scholar
• Köhler W, Wallach H. Figural after-effects: an investigation of visual processes. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 1944; 88: 269–357
   Google Scholar
• Kruse P, Stadler M, Wehner T. Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement. Vision Res. 1986; 26: 327–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long G M, Toppino T C. Multiple representations of the same reversible figure: Implications for cognitive decisional interpretations. Perception 1981; 10: 231–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbe K. Die Schwankungen der Gesichtsempfindungen. Phil. Stud. 1893; 8: 615–37
   Google Scholar
• Necker L A. Observations on some remarkable phenomena seen in Switzerland; and an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing of a crystal or geometrical solid. Phil. Mag. 1832; 3: 329–43, ser. 1
   Google Scholar
• Orbach J, Ehrlich D, Heath H A. Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of ‘satiation of orientation’. Percept. Mot. Skills 1963; 17: 439–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pöppel E. Lust und Schmerz. Neuronale Grundlagen menschlichen Verhaltens. Severin and Siedler, Berlin 1982
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran V S. Perception: a biological perspective. Neural Networks for Vision and Image Processing, G A Carpenter, S Grossberg. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1992; 45–91
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran V S, Anstis S M. Perceptual organisation in moving displays. Nature 1983; 304: 529–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran V S, Anstis S M. Perceptual organization in multistable apparent motion. Perception 1985; 14: 135–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock I, Hall S, Davis J. Why do ambiguous figures reverse?. Acta Psychologica 1994; 87: 33–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rock I, Mitchener K. Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects. Perception 1992; 21: 39–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin E. Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Gyldendalske, Copenhagen 1921
   Google Scholar
• von Schiller P. Stroboskopische Alternativbewegungen. Psychologische Forschung 1933; 17: 179–214
   Google Scholar
• Somers D C, Nelson S B, Sur M. An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. J. Neurosci. 1995; 15: 5448–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitz H H. Some experiments with a stationary and revolving three-dimensional skeletal cube. Paper presented at Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. New York City, April, 1963
   Google Scholar
• Stadler M, Erke H. Über einige periodische Vorgänge in der Figuralwahrnehmung. Vision Res. 1968; 8: 1081–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M M, Aldridge K D. Stochastic processes in reversing figure perception. Perception Psychophys. 1974; 16: 9–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppino T C, Long G M. Selective adaptation with reversible figures: don't change that channel. Perception Psychophys. 1987; 42: 37–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach H, Austin P. Recognition and localization of visual traces. Am. J. Psychol. 1954; 67: 338–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheimer M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt: II. Psychologische Forschung 1923; 4: 301–50
   Google Scholar
• Wimbauer S, Gerstner W, van Hemmen J L. Emergence of spatio-temporal receptive fields and its application to motion detection. Biol. Cybern. 1994; 72: 81–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimbauer S, Miller K D, van Hemmen J L. Development of spatiotemporal receptive fields of simple cells. Preprint 1996, TU München
   Google Scholar