9
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The influence of neural activity and intracortical connectivity on the periodicity of ocular dominance stripes

Pages 419-432 | Received 26 Mar 1998, Published online: 09 Jul 2009

References

  • Bauer H-U, Brockmann D, Geisel T. Analysis of ocular dominance pattern formation in a high-dimensional self-organizing-map model. Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 1997; 8: 17–33
  • Bienenstock E, von der Malsburg C. A neural network for the retrieval of superimposed connection patterns. Europhys. Lett. 1987a; 3: 1243–9
  • Bienenstock E, von der Malsburg C. A neural network for invariant pattern recognition. Europhys. Lett. 1987b; 4: 121–6
  • Cheng H J, Nakamoto M, Bergemann A D, Flanagan J G. Complementary gradients in expression and binding of Elf-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map. Cell 1995; 82: 371–81
  • Dayan P S. Arbitrary elastic topologies and ocular dominance. Neural Comput. 1993; 5: 392–401
  • Dayan P S, Goodhill G J. Perturbing Hebbian rules. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 4, J E Moody, S J Hanson, R P Lippman. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA 1992; 19–26
  • Drescher U, Kremoser C, Handwerker C, Loschinger J, Noda M, Bonhoeffer F. In-vitro guidance of retinal ganglion-cell axons by RAGS, a 25 KDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 1995; 82: 359–70
  • Durbin R, Mitchison G. A dimension reduction framework for understanding cortical maps. Nature 1990; 343: 644–7
  • Durbin R, Willshaw D J. An analogue approach to the travelling salesman problem using an elastic net method. Nature 1987; 326: 689–91
  • Elliott T, Howarth C I, Shadbolt N R. Axonal processes and neural plasticity. I: Ocular dominance columns. Cerebral Cortex 1996; 6: 781–8
  • Elliott T, Howarth C I, Shadbolt N R. Axonal processes and neural plasticity: a reply. Neural Comput. 1998; 10: 549–54
  • Erwin E, Obermayer K, Schulten K. Models of orientation and ocular dominance columns in the visual cortex: a critical comparison. Neural Comput. 1995; 7: 425–68
  • Flanagan J G, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 1998; 21: 309–45
  • Friedman G C, O'Leary D D M. Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1996; 6: 127–33
  • Gao P-P, Zhang J-H, Yokoyama M, Racey B, Dreyfus C F, Black I B, Zhou R. Regulation of topographic projection in the brain: Elf-1 in the hippocampalseptal system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1996; 93: 11161–6
  • Goodhill G J. Correlations, Competition and Optimality: Modelling the Development of Topography and Ocular Dominance. CSRP 226, University of Sussex. 1992, Cognitive Science Research Paper also available from giccs.georgetown.edu/∼geoff
  • Goodhill G J. Topography and ocular dominance: a model exploring positive correlations. Biol. Cybern. 1993; 69: 109–18
  • Goodhill G J. Gradients for retinotectal mapping. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, M I Jordan, M J Kearns, S A Solla. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1998; 152–8
  • Goodhill G J, Löwel S. Theory meets experiment: correlated neural activity helps determine ocular dominance column periodicity. Trends Neurosci. 1995; 18: 437–9
  • Goodhill G J, Finch S, Sejnowski T J. Quantifying neighbourhood preservation in topographic mappings. No. INC-9505, 1995, Institute for Neural Computation Technical Report Series November 1995, also available from giccs.georgetown.edu/∼geoff
  • Goodhill G J, Finch S, Sejnowski T J. Optimizing cortical mappings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, D S Touretzky, M C Mozer, M E Hasselmo. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996; 330–6
  • Goodhill G J, Sejnowski T J. Quantifying neighbourhood preservation in topographic mappings. Proc. 3rd Joint Symp. on Neural Computation University of California, San Diego and California Institute of Technology). California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 1996; 6: 61–82, also available from giccs.georgetown.edu/∼geoff
  • Goodhill G J, Sejnowski T J. A unifying objective function for topographic mappings. Neural Comput. 1997; 9: 1291–304
  • Goodhill G J, Willshaw D J. Application of the elastic net algorithm to the formation of ocular dominance stripes. Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 1990; 1: 41–59
  • Hensch T K, Stryker M P. Intracortical interactions regulate ocular dominance column segregation. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 1996; 22: 1729
  • Horton J C, Hocking D R. Anatomical demonstration of ocular dominance columns in striate cortex of the squirrel monkey. J. Neurosci. 1996a; 16: 5510–22
  • Horton J C, Hocking D R. Intrinsic variability of ocular dominance column periodicity in normal macaque monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1996b; 16: 7228–39
  • Hubel D H, Wiesel T N. Functional architecture of the macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) B 1977; 198: 1–59
  • Jones D G, Van Sluyters R C, Murphy K M. A computational model for the overall pattern of ocular dominance. J. Neurosci. 1991; 11: 3794–808
  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983; 220: 671–80
  • Kohonen T. Analysis of a simple self-organizing process. Biol. Cybern. 1982; 44: 135–40
  • Krug K, Thompson I D. Visual driving of cortical neurons through the unopened eyes of neonatal ferrets. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 1997; 23: 1665
  • LeVay S, Connolly M, Houde J, Van Essen D C. The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 1985; 5: 486–501
  • LeVay S, Stryker M P, Shatz C J. Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: a quantitative study. J. Comp. Neurol. 1978; 179: 223–44
  • Livingstone M. Ocular dominance columns in New-World monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1996; 16: 2086–96
  • Löwel S. Ocular dominance column development: strabismus changes the spacing of adjacent columns in cat visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 1994; 14: 7451–68
  • Luttrell S P. Derivation of a class of training algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 1990; 1: 229–32
  • Luttrell S P. A Bayesian analysis of self-organizing maps. Neural Comput. 1994; 6: 767–94
  • Miller K D. Equivalence of a sprouting-and-retraction model and correlation-based plasticity models of neural development. Neural Comput. 1998; 10: 529–47
  • Miller K D, Keller J B, Stryker M P. Ocular dominance column development: Analysis and simulation. Science 1989; 245: 605–15
  • Mitchison G. Neuronal branching patterns and the economy of cortical wiring. Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) B 1991; 245: 151–8
  • Mitchison G. A type of duality between self-organizing maps and minimal wiring. Neural Comput. 1995; 7: 25–35
  • Obermayer K, Blasdel G G, Schulten K. Statistical-mechanical analysis of self-organization and pattern formation during the development of visual maps. Phys. Rev. A 1992; 45: 7568–89
  • Rakic P. Prenatal genesis of connections subserving ocular dominance in the rhesus monkey. Nature 1976; 261: 467–71
  • Sirosh J, Miikkulainen R. Topographic receptive fields and patterned lateral interaction in a self-organizing model of the primary visual cortex. Neural Comput. 1997; 9: 577–94
  • Swindale N V. A model for the formation of ocular dominance stripes. Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) B 1980; 208: 243–64
  • Swindale N V. The development of topography in the visual cortex: a review of models. Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 1996; 7: 161–247
  • Tieman S B, Tumosa N. Alternating monocular exposure increases the spacing of ocularity domains in area 17 of cats. Visual Neurosci. 1997; 14: 929–38
  • Torgerson W S. Multidimensional scaling, I: theory and method. Psychometrika 1952; 17: 401–19
  • Udin S B, Fawcett J W. Formation of topographic maps. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 1988; 11: 289–327
  • van Laarhoven P J M, Aarts E H L. Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications. Reidel, Dordrecht 1987
  • Wiskott L, Sejnowski T. Constrained optimization for neural map formation: a unifying framework for weight growth and normalization. Neural Comput. 1998; 10: 671–716
  • Yuille A L, Kolodny J A, Lee C W. Dimension reduction, generalized deformable models and the development of ocularity and orientation. Neural Networks 1996; 9: 309–19

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.