Nesting microbubbles: influence on acoustic activity and image brightness

References

• Schutt EG, Klein DH, Mattrey RM, Riess JG: ‘Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals’, Angew. Chem. Int. Edn, 2003, 42, (28), 3218–3235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel RE, Holland CK: ‘Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound’, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 1991, 17, (2), 179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomas JE, Dayton P, May D, Ferrara K: ‘Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents’, J. Biomed. Opt., 2001, 6, (2), 141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema M, Schmitz G: ‘Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging’, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 2006, 6, (3), 493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church CC: ‘Frequency, pulse length, and the mechanical index’, Acoust. Res. Lett. Online, 2005, 6, (3), 162–168.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo TL: ‘Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out’, Academic Press Series in Biomedical Engineering, (ed. , Bronzino J), 576; 2004, New York, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khawaja OA, Shaikh KA, Al-Mallah MH: ‘Meta-analysis of adverse cardiovascular events associated with echocardiographic contrast agents’, Am. J. Cardiol., 2010, 106, (5), 742–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicker S, Mleczko M, Hensel K, Bartolomeo A, Schmitz G, Wrenn SP: ‘Nesting of lipid microbubbles within polymer microcapsules for contrast applications’, Bubble Sci. Eng. Technol., 2011, 3, (1), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon S: ‘Development of nano-sized polymeric ultrasound contrast agents for cancer diagnosis and therapy’, PhD thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lathia JD, Leodore L, Wheatley MA: ‘Polymeric contrast agent with targeting potential’, Ultrasonics, 2004, 42, (1–9), 763–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Porter T: ‘An in vitro study of a phase-shift nanoemulsion: a potential nucleation agent for bubble-enhanced hifu tumor ablation’, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2010, 36, (11), 1856–1866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Cho SH, Lee JM, Hahn ST: ‘Effect of microbubble contrast agent during high intensity focused ultrasound ablation on rabbit liver in vivo’, Eur. J. Radiol., 2012, 81, (4), e519–e523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MN, Berglund RK, Jones JS: ‘A practical guide to prostate cancer diagnosis and management’, Cleveland Clin. J. Med., 2011, 78, (5), 321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nashida Y, Yamakado K, Kumamoto T, Suga S, Takaki H, Hori H, Azuma E, Komada Y: ‘Radiofrequency ablation used for the treatment of frequently recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma in the masticator space in a 10-year-old girl’, J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol., 2007, 29, (9), 640–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler I, Adam D: ‘Monitoring radio-frequency thermal ablation with ultrasound by low frequency acoustic emissions – in vitro and in vivo study’, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2011, 37, (5), 755–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrenn S, Dicker S, Small E, Mleczko M: ‘Controlling cavitation for controlled release’, Proc. Int. Ultrasonics Symp., Rome, Italy, September 2009, IEEE International.
   Google Scholar
• Wrenn SP, Mleczko M, Schmitz G: ‘Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: Influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles’, Appl. Acoust., 2009, 70, (10), 1313–1322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Yoshioka T, Lucarelli M, Hwang LH, Langer R: ‘Controlled delivery systems for proteins based on poly(lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres’, Pharmaceut. Res., 1991, 8, (6), 713–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain RA: ‘The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices’, Biomaterials, 2000, 21, (23), 2475–2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng FT, Ma GH, Qiu W, Su ZG: ‘W/O/W double emulsion technique using ethyl acetate as organic solvent: effects of its diffusion rate on the characteristics of microparticles’, J. Control. Rel., 2003, 91, (3), 407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surry KJ, Austin HJ, Fenster A, Peters TM: ‘Poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel phantoms for use in ultrasound and MR imaging’, Phys. Med. Biol., 2004, 49, (24), 5529–5546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar