References
- Sacristan JA, Gomez JC, Badia X, Kind P: Global index of safety (GIS). A new instrument to assess drug safety. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1120–5
- Gomez JC, Sacristan JA, Hernandez J, et al. The safety of olanzapine compared with other antipsychotic drugs: results of an observational prospective study in patients with schizophrenia (EFESO Study). Pharmacoepidemiologic study of olanzapine in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:335–43
- Gomez JC, Sacristan JA, Alvarez E, et al. Safety and effectiveness of olanzapine versus typical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of inpatients with schizophrenia (EUROPA Study). J Psychopharmacol 2000;14:PG28
- Harris DR, Lord FM. Statistical treatment of nominal numbers. Psychol Reports 1971;29:367–72
- MacKnight C, Rockwood K. Rasch analysis of the hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility (HABAM). J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1242–7
- Rasch G. Probabilistic model for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: MESA Press; 1980
- Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press; 1979
- Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press; 1982
- Young NL, Williams JI, Yoshida KK, Wright JG. Measurement properties of the activities scale for kids. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:125–37
- Cook KF, Rabeneck L, Campbell CJ, Wray NP. Evaluation of a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia-related health for use in a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:381–92
- Raczek AE, Ware JE, Bjorner JB, et al. Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. [International Quality of Life Assessment]. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1203–14
- Prieto L, Alonso J, Ferrer M, Anto JM. Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. [Quality of Life in COPD Study Group]. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:463–73
- McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware Jr JE. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50: 451–61
- Stucki G, Daltroy L, Katz JN, Johannesson M, Liang MH. Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: the whole may not equal the sum of the parts. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:711–7
- Haley SM, McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47: 671–84
- Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 1995;50:741–9
- Anastasi A, Urbina S. Psychological testing, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1997
- Wright BD, Linacre M. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994;8:170
- Linacre JM. BIGSTEPS. Chicago: MESA Press; 1995
- Bond TG, Fox CM, Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2001
- Smith Jr EV. Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: a Rasch measurement perspective. J Appl Measurement 2001;2:281–311