Short-term economic impact associated with occupational needlestick injuries among acute care nurses

References

• Incidence of needlestick, and sharps injuries and medical safety devices [online]. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OH-04-003.html [last accessed 31 May 2005]
   Google Scholar
• English JF. Reported hospital needlestick injuries in relation to knowledge/skill, design, and management problems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:259–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon RR, Flanagan PA, Karkashian C, et al. Health care workers’ experience with postexposure management of bloodborne pathogen exposures: a pilot study. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:421–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen M, McNary J, Lewis J, et al. Sharps-related injuries in California healthcare facilities: pilot study results from the Sharps Injury Surveillance Registry. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:113–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey SD, Nettleman MD. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic AZT following needlestick injury in health care workers. Med Decis Mak 1992;12:142–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orenstein R, Reynolds L, Karabaic M, Lamb A, Markowitz SM, Wong ES. Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers? Am J Infect Control 1995;23: 344–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holodnick CL, Barkauskas V. Reducing percutaneous injuries in the OR by educational methods. AORN J 2000;72: 461–72, 475
   Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Botteman MF, Nicklasson L, Cobden D, Pashos CL. Needlestick injury in acute care nurses caring for patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:741–7
   Google Scholar
• US Public Health Service. Updated US public health service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR Recomm Rep 2001;50:1–52
   Google Scholar
• Medical Economics Thompson Healthcare. Redbook 2004 top 200 brand name Rx drugs. 2004
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Labor. National occupational employment and wage estimates [online]. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_29he.htm [last accessed 2 July 2005]
   Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Botteman MF, Xanthakos N, Nicklasson L. Needlestick injuries in the United States. Epidemiologic, economic, and quality of life issues. AAOHN J 2005;53:117–33
   Google Scholar
• Alvarado-Ramy F, Beltrami EM, Short LJ, et al. A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993–1995. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24: 97–104
   Google Scholar
• Beekmann SE, Vlahov D, Koziol DE, McShalley ED, Schmitt JM, Henderson DK. Temporal association between implementation of universal precautions and a sustained, progressive decrease in percutaneous exposures to blood. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:562–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longbottom HM, Cox K, Sokas RK. Body fluid exposure in an urban tertiary care medical center. Am J Ind Med 1993;23:703–10
   Google Scholar
• Linnemann Jr CC, Cannon C, DeRonde M, Lanphear B. Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:214–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson MA, Williams K, Olson-Burgess C, Kinney J, Olson LC, Burry VF. Needlestick injuries in a pediatric hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:318–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haiduven DJ, DeMaio TM, Stevens DA. A five-year study of needlestick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:265–71
   Google Scholar
• Tokars JI, Marcus R, Culver DH, et al. Surveillance of HIV infection and zidovudine use among health care workers after occupational exposure to HIV-infected blood [The CDC Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group]. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:913–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale JC, Pruett SK, Maker MD. Accidental needlesticks in the phlebotomy service of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Mayo Clin Proc 1998;73:611–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner K. Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospital. J Healthc Mater Manage 1993;11:44–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilburn S. Preventing needlestick injuries. Am J Nurs 1999;99:71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Updated US public health service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis [online]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm [last accessed 10 June 2005]
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control (CDC). Update on hepatitis B prevention. MMWR 1987;36:353–60
   Google Scholar
• Graham JD, Corso PS, Morris JM, Segui-Gomez M, Weinstein MC. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of clinical and public health measures. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:125–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendelson MH, Short LJ, Schechter CB, et al. Study of a needleless intermittent intravenous-access system for peripheral infusions: analysis of staff, patient, and institutional outcomes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:401–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Initial Statement of Reasons. California code of regulations title 8: general industry safety orders [online]. Available from: http://www.dir.ca.gov/OSHSB/sharps2.HTML [last accessed 22 June 2005]
   Google Scholar
• Fisman DN, Mittleman MA, Sorock GS, Harris AD. Willingness to pay to avoid sharps-related injuries: a study in injured health care workers. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:283–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar