Assessing glucose meter accuracy

References

• Bergenstal R, Pearson J, Cembrowski GS, et al. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy. Diabetes Educ 2000;26:981–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 1993;329: 977–86
   Google Scholar
• Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;28:103–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S15–S35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarol Jr JN, Nicodemus Jr NA, Tan KM, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of a multi-component therapy among non-insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis (1966–2004). Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:173–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welschen LMC, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2005;28: 1510–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S, Schneider B, Heinemann L, et al.; for the ROSSO Study Group. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes and long-term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study. Diabetologia 2006;49: 271–8
   Google Scholar
• Nichols JH. What is accuracy and how close must the agreement be? Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:558–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nichols JH. Bedside testing, glucose monitoring, and diabetes management. In: Kost GJ, editor. Principles & practice of point-of-care testing, 1st ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 194–213
   Google Scholar
• Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2002;48:436–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch IB, Lee T, Trence DL. Blood glucose data from meter memories unable to assist in pattern recognition [abstract]. Diabetes 2006;55:A94 [abstract 400-P]
   Google Scholar
• American Association for Clinical Chemistry. Glucose standards II. Protein precipitation followed by hexokinase/ glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Available at: http://www. aacc.org/standards/general.stm#12 [accessed June 1, 2006]
   Google Scholar
• Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, et al. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:622–8
   Google Scholar
• Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, et al. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1143–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems – requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO International Standard 15197; 2003
   Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care 1996;19:S62–S66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B, Pichler M. Newer portable glucose meters – analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices? Clin Chem 1999;45:1821–5
   Google Scholar
• Weinzimer SA, Beck RW, Chase HP, et al. Accuracy of newer-generation home blood glucose meters in a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) inpatient exercise study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:675–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen M, Boyle E, Delaney C, et al. A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006;71:113–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan V, Deepa R, Shefali AK, et al. Evaluation of One Touch HORIZON – a highly affordable glucose monitor. J Assoc Physicians India 2004;52:779–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendall DM, Kaplan RA, Paulson CF, et al. Accuracy and utility of a 10-test disk blood glucose meter. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005;67:29–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai KS, Tai DY, Ho P, et al. Accuracy of the EasyTouch blood glucose self-monitoring system: a study of 516 cases. Clin Chim Acta 2004;349:135–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larbig M, Forst T, Mondok A, et al. Investigation on the accuracy of the blood glucose monitoring device Prestige IQ. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2003;16:257–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen ET, Nichols JH, Duh S-H, et al. Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:749–68
   Google Scholar
• The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DIRECNET) Research Group. A multicenter study of the accuracy of the One Touch Ultra home glucose meter in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5: 933–41
   Google Scholar
• Lewandrowski K, Cheek R, Nathan DM, et al. Implementation of capillary blood glucose monitoring in a teaching hospital and determination of program requirements to maintain quality testing. Am J Med 1992;93:419–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski SA. Advances and strategies for glucose monitoring. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:S59–S71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar