Racial and ethnic differences in preference-based health status measure

References

• Hobbs F, Stoops N. Demographic trends in the 20th Century: census 2000 special reports. US Census Bureau, 2002
   Google Scholar
• US interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. March 18, 2004. US Census Bureau. Available from http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/ [Last accessed 2 Feb 2006]
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine, unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Health related quality of life. In: Berger ML, Bingefors K, Hedblom EC, et al., editors. Health care cost, quality, and outcomes. ISPOR book of terms. Lawrenceville, NJ: International Society for Pharmoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Krupski TL, Sonn G, Kwan L, et al. Ethnic variation in health-related quality of life among low-income men with prostate cancer. Ethn Dis 2005;15:461–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willan A, Goeree R, Pullenayegum E, et al. Economic evaluation of rivastigmine in patients with Parkinson’s disease dementia. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24:93–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels JA, Brazier JE, Campbell WB, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins. Br J Surg 2006;93:175–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry DA, Hill SR, Harris A. Drug prices and value for money: the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. JAMA 2005;294:2630–2
   Google Scholar
• Fallon EM, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Norman A, et al. Health-related quality of life in overweight and nonoverweight black and white adolescents. J Pediatr 2005;147:443–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon CG, Kawachi I. Quality-of-life differences among various populations of localized prostate cancer patients: 2001. Curr Urol Rep 2002;3:239–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubetkin EI, Jia H, Franks P, et al. Relationship among socio-demographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Qual Life Res 2005;14:2187–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard G, Anderson RT, Russell G, et al. Race, socioeconomic status, and cause-specific mortality. Ann Epidemiol 2000;10: 214–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vital Statistics of the United States. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/vsus/vsus.htm [Last accessed 7 June 2006]
   Google Scholar
• Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Available from http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/ [Last accessed 18 Dec 2005]
   Google Scholar
• Weights and response rates for the self-administered questionnaire. In: MEPS HC-079: 2003 full year consolidated data file. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, November 2005, c123–4
   Google Scholar
• EuoQol Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, P. Modeling variations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005;43: 203–20
   Google Scholar
• Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;36:8–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comorbidity Software Version 3.0. Available from http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidity/comorbidity.jsp [Last accessed 19 Jan 2006]
   Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987;40:373–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45: 613–9
   Google Scholar
• Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care 2004;42:355–60
   Google Scholar
• Jones AM. Health econometrics. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of health economics, Volume 1. New York: Elsevier Science, 2000, pp.267–89
   Google Scholar
• Duan N, Manning WG, Morris CN, et al. A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1983;1:115–26
   Google Scholar
• Fu AZ, Liu GG, Christensen DB. Inappropriate medication use and health outcomes in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1934–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995; 36:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005;43:736–49
   Google Scholar
• Franks P, Muennig P, Lubetkin E, et al. The burden of disease associated with being African–American in the United States and the contribution of socio-economic status. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:2469–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Coons SJ. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample. Qual Life Res 1998;7:155–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Pickard AS. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. Med Care 2000;38:115–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avis NE, Ory M, Matthews KA, et al. Health-related quality of life in a multiethnic sample of middle-aged women: study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Med Care 2003;41:1262–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Satayathum S, et al. Health-related quality of life and associated outcomes among hemodialysis patients of different ethnicities in the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41:605–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo N, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, et al. Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and health utilities index. Med Care 2005;43: 1078–86
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RM, Sieber WJ, Ganiats TG. The Quality of Well-Being Scale: comparison of the interviewer-administered version with the self-administered questionnaire. Psychol Health 1997;12:783–91
   Google Scholar
• Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The health utilities index system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 2001;33:375–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond MF, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005
   Google Scholar
• Kind P, Hardman G, Leese B. Measuring health status: information for primary care decision making. Health Policy 2005;71:303–13
   Google Scholar
• Holland R, Lenaghan E, Harvey I, et al. Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;330:293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EuroQol website. Available from http://www.euroqol.org/web/users/language.php [Last accessed 7 Feb 2006]
   Google Scholar
• McDonald JF, Moffitt RA. The use of Tobit analysis. Rev Econ Stat 1980;62:318–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TP, O’Rourke D, Chavez N, et al. Cultural variations in the interpretation of health survey questions. In: Warnecke RB, editor. Health survey research methods. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1996, pp.57–62
   Google Scholar
• Haas-Wilson D, Savoca E. Quality and provider choice: A multi-nomial logit-least squares model with selectivity. Health Serv Res 1990;24:791–809
   Google Scholar