Cost–effectiveness analysis of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with Interstim for fecal incontinence patients in Spain

References

• Bishoff JT, Motley G, Optenberg SA, et al. Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population. J Urol 1998;160:454–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck P, Bielefeldt P, Rathmann W, et al. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence in selected patient group. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:143–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995;274:559–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Duyos A, Montero J, Navarro A, et al. Incontinencia fecal: neurofisiologia y neuromodulación. Cir Esp 2004;76:65–70
   Google Scholar
• Arribas D, Córdoba E, Latorre A, Arribas R. Incontinencia anal. Semergen 2004;30:218–22
   Google Scholar
• Minguez PM, Benages MA. Quality of life in patients with anal incontinence. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;27(Suppl 3):39–48
   Google Scholar
• Nelson RL. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126:S3–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamm MA. Fecal incontinence. BMJ 1998;316:528–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellgren A, Jensen LL, Zetterstrom JP, et al. Long-term cost of fecal incontinence secondary to obstetric injuries. Dis Col Rectum 1999;42:857–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miner PB, Jr. Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126:S8–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouf AJ, Chambers MG, Kamm MA. Clinical and economic evaluation of surgical treatments for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2001;88:1029–36
   Google Scholar
• Rattan S, Culver PJ. Influence of loperamide on the internal anal sphincter in the opossum. Gastroenterology 1987;93:121–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck P, Daublin G, Lubke HJ, Strohmeyer G. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:997–1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck P. Biofeedback training in disordered defecation: a critical review. Digest Dis Sci 1993;38:1953–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton c, Hosker G, Brazzelli M. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of fecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD002111
   Google Scholar
• Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Herman FN, et al. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Col Rectum 1984;27:720–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelmann DG. The role of sphinteroplasty for fecal incontinence re-evaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Col Rectum 1991;34:22–30
   Google Scholar
• Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for fecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD001757
   Google Scholar
• Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Naggar K, et al. Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:716–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1139–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE Clinical Guideline 49. Faecal incontinence: the management of faecal incontinence in adults. London, July 2007. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/CG049
   Google Scholar
• Madoff RD. Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126:S48–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, et al. Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 2004;91:1559–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dobben AC, et al. Impact of faecal incontinence severity on health domains. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:263–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton K, Schupher M, McCabe C, et al. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra. Health Economics 2005;14:339–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell CM, Chapman RH, Stone PW, et al. An off-the-shelf help list: a comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published Cost-Effectiveness analyses. Med Decis Making 2001;21:288–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisbert R, Brosa M. Base de Datos de Costes Sanitarios eSalud. Barcelona, 2006. Available at http://www.oblikue.com.
   Google Scholar
• Gavira Iglesias FJ, Ocerin JM, Perez del Molino MJ, et al. Use of devices for urinary incontinence among the elderly of the basic health area of Cabra (Cordoba). Aten Primaria 2000;25:556–9
   Google Scholar
• Tejido M, Nebot S, Coma A. Estudio comparativo sobre los beneficios de la irrigación de la persona colostomizada: adaptación, confort y costes. Enferm Clin 1999;9:7–12
   Google Scholar
• Briggs AH, Goeree R, Blackhouse G, O'Brien BJ. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Decis Making 2002;22:290–308
   Google Scholar
• Sacristan JA, Oliva J, Del Llano J, et al. What is an efficient health technology in Spain? Gac Sanit 2002;16:334–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deutekom M, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Costs of outpatients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:552–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar