Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration

References

• Lynch CD, Zhang J. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21(Suppl 2):86-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MH, Carr-Hill RA, Fraser C, et al. The extent and antecedents of uncertain gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:445-51
   Google Scholar
• Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:189-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin I, Morin L, Zhang X, et al. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:145-52
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, et al. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:613-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buekens P, Delvoye P, Wollast E, et al. Epidemiology of pregnancies with unknown last menstrual period. J Epidemiol Community Health 1984;38:79-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, et al. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21(Suppl 2):62-71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henriksen TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, et al. Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology 1995;6:533-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjessing HK, Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ. Errors in gestational age: evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy. Am J Public Health 1999;89:213-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH, Bremnes JB. The growth of the human embryo. A longitudinal biometric assessment from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:346-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr WB, Pecci CC. Last menstrual period versus ultrasound for pregnancy dating. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;87:38-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:178-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Chitty LS. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:174-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:388-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPD. Data on file
   Google Scholar
• Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey DR, et al. Rescue of the corpus luteum in human pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2003;68:448-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grun JP, Meuris S, De NP, et al. The thyrotrophic role of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in the early stages of twin (versus single) pregnancies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997;46:719-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier DS, Berndt S, Tsampalas M, et al. Dialogue between blastocyst hCG and endometrial LH/hCG receptor: which role in implantation? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2007;64:156-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis J, Pike J, Johnson, S, et al. Poster presented at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Rome, Italy, 23-27 June 2010
   Google Scholar
• Johnson SR, Miro F, Barrett S, et al. Levels of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) following conception and variability of menstrual cycle length in a cohort of women attempting to conceive. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:741-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper C, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 1934;26:404-413
   Google Scholar
• National Office for Statistics. Statistical Bulletin: Who is having babies – 2008? Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/births1209.pdf [Accessed on 19 November 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Savitz DA, Terry JW Jr, Dole N, et al. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1660-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird DD, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR, et al. Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology 1995;6:547-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsjo P, Denman DW III, Hoffman HJ, et al. Duration of human singleton pregnancy. A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990;69:197-207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole LA, Ladner DG, Byrn FW. The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 2009;91:522-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow SD, Ephross SA. Epidemiology of menstruation and its relevance to women's health. Epidemiol Rev 1995;17:265-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verp MS. Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders. In: Gleicher N, ed. Principles and Practice of Medical Therapy in Pregnancy, 2nd edn. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1992:159-70
   Google Scholar
• Gardosi J. Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:367-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ. Early fetal growth: concepts and pitfalls. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:385-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepomnaschy PA, Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, et al. Urinary hCG patterns during the week following implantation. Hum Reprod 2008;23:271-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenton EA, Neal LM, Sulaiman R. Plasma concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin from the time of implantation until the second week of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1982;37:773-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz MA, Guo SM. Doubling time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in early normal pregnancy: relationship to hCG concentration and gestational age. Fertil Steril 1987;47:584-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule AH, Michlewitz H, Boyle E, et al. Use of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin in gestational aging. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1985;15:428-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller PB, Soules MR. The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:13-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luciano AA, Marana R, Kratka S, et al. Ovarian function after incision of the ovary by scalpel, CO2 laser, and microelectrode. Fertil Steril 1991;56:349-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermesh M, Kletzky OA, Davajan V, et al. Monitoring techniques to predict and detect ovulation. Fertil Steril 1987;47:259-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison KL, Wilson LM, Breen TM, et al. Fertilization of human oocytes in relation to varying delay before insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;50:294-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuzpe AA, Liu Z, Fluker MR. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-salvaging in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles after total or near-total fertilization failure. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1115-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira-Poblete A. The probability of conception on different days of the cycle with respect to ovulation: an overview. Adv Contracept 1997;13:83-95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar