952
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Usability and preference evaluation of a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals

, , &
Pages 2043-2052 | Accepted 16 Aug 2011, Published online: 14 Sep 2011

References

  • Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;87:4-14
  • Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, et al. Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;87:293-301
  • The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86
  • Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837-53
  • Coscelli C, Lostia S, Lunetta M, et al. Safety, efficacy, acceptability of a pre-filled insulin pen in diabetic patients over 60 years old. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;28:173-7
  • Keith K, Nicholson D, Rogers D. Accuracy and precision of low-dose insulin administration using syringes, pen injectors, and a pump. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2004;43:69-74
  • Lteif AN, Schwenk WF. Accuracy of pen injectors versus insulin syringes in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22:137-40
  • Glasgow RE, Fisher EB, Anderson BJ, et al. Behavioral science in diabetes. Contributions and opportunities. Diabetes Care 1999;22:832-43
  • Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2673-9
  • Summers KH, Szeinbach SL, Lenox SM. Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers. Clin Ther 2004;26:1498-505
  • Thurman JE. Insulin pen injection devices for management of patients with type 2 diabetes: considerations based on an endocrinologist's practical experience in the United States. Endocr Pract 2007;13:672-8
  • Sommavilla B, Jorgensen C, Jensen KH. Safety, simplicity and convenience of a modified prefilled insulin pen. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2008;9:2223-32
  • Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and treatment preference associated with use of a pen device delivering a premixed 70/30 insulin aspart suspension (aspart protamine suspension/soluble aspart) versus alternative treatment strategies. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2495-7
  • Hunt LM, Valenzuela MA, Pugh JA. NIDDM patients' fears and hopes about insulin therapy. The basis of patient reluctance. Diabetes Care 1997;20:292-8
  • Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C, et al. Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care 2010;33:733-5
  • Mollema ED, Snoek FJ, Heine RJ, et al. Phobia of self-injecting and self-testing in insulin-treated diabetes patients: opportunities for screening. Diabet Med 2001;18:671-4
  • Peyrot M, Mathews DR, Snoek FJ, et al. An international study of psychological resistance to insulin use among persons with diabetes. Diabetologia 2003;46(Suppl 2):A89
  • Zambanini A, Newson RB, Maisey M, et al. Injection related anxiety in insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1999;46:239-46
  • Brunton S. Insulin delivery systems: reducing barriers to insulin therapy and advancing diabetes mellitus treatment. Am J Med 2008;121:S35-41
  • Olsen BS, Lilleøre SK, Korsholm CN, et al. NovoPen Echo for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents and health care professionals. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2010;4:1468-75
  • Pfützner J, Hellhammer J, Musholt P, et al. Evaluation of dexterity in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011;5:158-65
  • Asakura T, Jensen KH. Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use, and preference in two insulin pens. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:312-19
  • Pearson TL. Practical aspects of insulin pen devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:522-31
  • Bastian MD, Wolters NE, Bright DR. Insulin pens vs. vials and syringes: differences in clinical and economic outcomes. Consult Pharm 2011;26:426-9
  • Hemmingsen H, Niemeyer M, Hansen MR, et al. A prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism and a lower injection force than other prefilled insulin pens. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0110. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Pfützner A, Reimer T, Frokjaer LPF, et al. Prefilled insulin device with reduced injection force: patient perception and accuracy. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:2545-9
  • Savas¸ S, Köroğlu BK, Koyuncuoğlu HR, et al. The effects of the diabetes related soft tissue hand lesions and the reduced hand strength on functional disability of hand in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;77:77-83
  • Schady W, Abuaisha B, Boulton AJ. Observations on severe ulnar neuropathy in diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 1998;12:128-32
  • Ziegler D, Gries FA, Spuler M, et al. The epidemiology of diabetic neuropathy. DiaCAN Multicenter Study Group. Diabet Med 1993;10(Suppl 2):82S-6S
  • Wielandt JO, Niemeyer M, Hansen MR, et al. FlexTouch®: a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism with consistent, high accuracy at low (1 IU), medium (40 IU) and high (80 IU) dose settings. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2011;5:1195-9
  • Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Factors associated with persistence and resumption of insulin pen use for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Tech Therapeut 2011;13:43-8
  • Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Factors affecting use of insulin pens by patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008;31:430-2
  • Faurie C, Raymond M. Handedness frequency over more than ten thousand years. Proc Biol Sci 2004;271(Suppl 3):S43-5
  • Buus P, Lilleøre SK, Larsen K. Compatibility testing of two types of pen needles with a range of injection pens for diabetes medication. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:589-92
  • Niskanen L, Jensen LE, Rastam J, et al. Randomized, multinational, open-label, 2-period, crossover comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and biphasic insulin lispro 25 and pen devices in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2004;26:531-40
  • Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1945;1:80-3
  • McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947;12:153-7
  • Brod M, Kongso JH, Lessard S, et al. Psychological insulin resistance: patient beliefs and implications for diabetes management. Qual Life Res 2009;18:23-32
  • Clark PE, Valentine V, Bodie JN, et al. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:1745-53
  • Musholt P, Schipper C, Niemeyer M, et al. Self-assessment and determination of dexterity and cognitive function in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus [abstract] No 2222-PO. American Diabetes Association 71st Scientific Sessions. Diabetes 2011;60(Suppl 1)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.