Self-assessment and objective determination of dexterity in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

References

• American Diabetes Association. Clinical Treatment Recommendations 2009. Diabetes Care 2009;32:S1-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adili F, Larijani B, Haghighatpanah M. Diabetic patients: psychological aspects. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1084:329-49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoek FJ. Barriers to good glycaemic control: the patient’s perspective. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24(Suppl 3):S12-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schächinger H, Cox D, Linder L, et al. Cognitive and psychomotor function in hypoglycemia: response error patterns and retest reliability. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2003;75:915-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes J, Deary IJ, Frier BM. Effects of acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on psychomotor function: people with type 1 diabetes are less affected than non-diabetic adults. Diabetologia 2008;51:1814-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969;50:311-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoppe KJ. Das MLS-Gerät: ein neuer Testapparat zur Messung feinmotorischer Leistungen. [The MLS device a new test device for measurement of fine motor skills. Diagnostica 1974;20:43-7
   Google Scholar
• Pfützner J, Hellhammer J, Musholt P, et al. Evaluation of dexterity, cognitive capacity and perception of chronic stress in patients with insulin treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011;5:158-65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hackel ME, Wolfe GA, Bang SM, et al. Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen test of Hand Function. Phys Ther 1992;6:373-7
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman EA. Structure and measurement of psychomotor abilities. In Singer RN, ed. The Psychomotor Domain: Movement Behavior. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1972:78-196
   Google Scholar
• Travieso D, Lederman SJ. Assessing subclinical tactual deficits in the hand function of diabetic blind persons at risk for peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1662-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova JE, Casanova JS, Young MJ. Hand function in patients with diabetes mellitus. South Med J 1991;84:1111-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederlund RI, Thomsen N, Thrainsdottir S, et al. Hand disorders, hand function, and activities of daily living in elderly men with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat 2007;23:32-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin LB, Thrainsdottir S, Cederlund R, et al. Vibrotactile sense in median and ulnar nerve innervated fingers of men with type 2 diabetes, normal or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabet Med 2008;25:543-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovend’Eerdt TJ, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Evaluation of the Modified Jebsen Test of Hand Function and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:195-202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringendahl H. Factor structure, normative data and retest-reliability of a test of fine motor functions in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2002;24:491-502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videler AJ, Beelen A, van Schaik IN, et al. Manual dexterity in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 1a: severity of limitations and feasibility and reliability of two assessment instruments. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:132-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videler AJ, Beelen A, Nollet F. Manual dexterity and related functional limitations in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. An explorative study. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:634-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm W, Büssing A. Ergänzende Normierungsdaten und Retest-Reliabilitätskoeffizienten zur Motorischen Leistungsserie (MLS) nach Schoppe. [Additional reference data and retest-reliability coefficients for the motoric performance series] Diagnostica 1985;3:234-45
   Google Scholar
• Asakura T, Jensen KH. Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use, and preference in two insulin pens. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:312-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ignaut DA, Schwartz SL, Sarwat S, et al. Comparative device assessments: Humalog KwikPen compared with vial and syringe and FlexPen. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:789-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark PE, Valentine V, Bodie JN, et al. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:1745-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfützner A. FlexPen for the delivery of insulin: accuracy, injection force and patient preference. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009;6:115-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslan M, Blubaugh M. Analysis: including visual impaired participants in validation design studies of diabetes technology. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2004;4:1236-7
   Google Scholar
• Williams AS. Analysis: linking laboratory data to human factors and inclusion of persons with disabilities in diabetes technology research. J. Diabetes Sci Technol 2011;5:1192-4
   Google Scholar