Systematic review and meta-analysis of application of fibrin sealant after liver resection

References

• Hospital Episode Statistics. Main operations. 3 character: 2004–2005. Available at: http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=205 (Last accessed 2 March 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Kohn GP, Nikfarjam M. The effect of surgical volume and the provision of residency and fellowship training on complications of major hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1981-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makuuchii M, Sano K. The surgical approach to HCC: our progress and results in Japan. Liver Transpl 2004;10:46-52
   Google Scholar
• Holt DR, Thiel DV, Edelstein S, et al. Hepatic resections. Arch Surg 2000;135:1353-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, et al. Criteria for safe hepatic resection. Am J Surg 1995;169:589-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasue N. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: indications, techniques, complications, and prognostic factors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1998;5:7-13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bechstein WO, Neuhaus P. Bleeding problems in liver surgery and liver transplantation. Chirurg 2000;71:363-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkozai EM, Lisman T, Porte RJ. Bleeding in liver surgery: prevention and treatment. Clin Liver Dis 2009;13:145-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spotnitz WD. Fibrin sealant: past, present, and future: a brief review. World J Surg 2010;34:632-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra DH. Fibrin sealant adhesive systems: a review of their chemistry, material properties and clinical applications. J Biomaterials Applications 1993;7:309-52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, et al. Biliary complications after hepatic resection. Arch Surg 1998;133:156-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MG, Jones D. Applications of fibrin sealant in surgery. Surg Innov 2005;12:203-13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Figueras J, Llado L, Miro M, et al. Application of fibrin glue sealant after liver resection does not seem justified: results of a randomized study in 300 patients. Ann Surg 2007;245:536-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noun R, Elias D, Balladur P, et al. Fibrin glue effectiveness and tolerance after elective liver resection: a randomized trial. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43:221-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Lui WY. The use of fibrin adhesive for hemostasis after liver resection. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1993;51:19-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uetsuji S, Komada Y, Kwon AH, et al. Prevention of pleural effusion after liver resection using fibrin sealant. Int Surg 1994;79:135-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu B, Zhong HC. The hemostatic effect of fibrin glue in treatment of liver neoplasm by using targeted cryoablation therapy during intraoperation. China Tropical Med 2005;5:1489-90
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz M, Madariaga J, Hirose R, et al. Comparison of a new fibrin sealant with standard topical hemostatic agents. Arch Surg 2004;139:1148-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman WC, Clavien PA, Fung J, et al. Effective control of hepatic bleeding with a novel collagen-based composite combined with autologous plasma. Arch Surg 2000;135:1200-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohno H, Nagasue N, Chang YC, et al. Comparison of topical hemostatic agents in elective hepatic resection: a clinical prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 1992;16:966-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer L, Christoph MS, Christoph EB, et al. Hemostatic efficacy of TachoSil in liver resection compared with argon beam coagulator treatment: an open, randomized, prospective, multicenter, parallel-group trial. Surgery 2011;149:48-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frilling A, Gregor A, Stavrou, HM, et al. Effectiveness of a new carrier-bound fibrin sealant versus argon beamer as haemostatic agent during liver resection: a randomised prospective trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005;390:114-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugenheim J, Bredt LC, Iannelli A. A randomized controlled trial comparing fibrin glue and PlasmaJet on the raw surface of the liver after hepatic resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:922-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briceño J, Naranjo A, Ciria R, et al. Prospective study of the efficacy of clinical application of a new carrier-bound fibrin sealant after liver resection. Arch Surg 2010;145:482-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longbin M, Bin L, Jin H, et al. Application of biomedical fibrin glue in laparoscopic liver resection. China Pharmacy 2007;18:1331-2
   Google Scholar
• Eder F, Frank M, Gerd N, et al. Sealing of the hepatic resection area using fibrin glue reduces significant amount of postoperative drain fluid. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:5984-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng JF, Wang HD, Xing YL, et al. Application of FF glue in left liver resection. Chin J Gen Surg 2001;10:181-2
   Google Scholar
• Toti L, Attia M, Manzia TM, et al. Reduction in bile leaks following adult split liver transplant using a fibrin–collagen sponge: a pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 2010;42:205-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ma JX, Geng ZM, Huang JY, et al. The hemostasis effect of fibrin glue for liver resection. Fourth Mil Med Univ 2003;24:1103
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is ‘quality of evidence’ and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008;336:995-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovanni I, Luca S, Attilio C, et al. Homemade vs. commercial fibrin glue in liver surgery. Blood Transfus 2006;4:81-91
   Google Scholar
• Akira H, Kazuki S, Masaya S, et al. New method for prevention of bile leakage after hepatic resection. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:57-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar