Author attitudes to professional medical writing support

References

• Lotery AJ. Authorship and the role of medical writers. Eye (London);2012;26:1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D, et al. Research methods & reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 2009;339:b4330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris R, Bowman A, Fagan JM, et al. International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) position statement: the role of the professional medical writer. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:1837-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs A, Wager E. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:317-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Medical Writers Association. AMWA code of ethics. Available at: http://www.amwa.org/amwa_ethics [Last accessed 14 April 2014]
   Google Scholar
• EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific Articles to be Published in English. Available at: http://www.ease.org.uk/publications/author-guidelines [Last accessed 3 June 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Bailey M. Science editing and its effect on manuscript acceptance time. J Am Med Writ Assoc 2011;26:147-52
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs A. Adherence to the CONSORT guideline in papers written by professional medical writers. Med Writ 2010;19:196-200
   Google Scholar
• Woolley KL, Lew RA, Stretton S, et al. Lack of involvement of medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry in publications retracted for misconduct: a systematic, controlled, retrospective study. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:1175-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipperfield L, Citrome L, Clark J, et al. Authors’ Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:1967-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PLoS Medicine Editors. Ghostwriting revisited: new perspectives but few solutions in sight. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001084
   Google Scholar
• Bosch X, Ross JS. Ghostwriting: research misconduct, plagiarism, or fool’s gold? Am J Med 2012;125:324-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ 2011;343:d6128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty DK. Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust. Ann Pharmacother 2013;47:1081-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager E, Field EA, Grossman L. Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies. Curr Med Res Opin 2003;19:149-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley K, Gertel A, Hamilton C, et al. Don’t be a fool – don’t use fool’s gold. Am J Med 2012;125:e21-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley KL, Gertel A, Hamilton CW, et al. Time to finger point or fix? An invitation to join ongoing efforts to promote ethical authorship and other good publication practices. Ann Pharmacother 2013;47:1084-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley KL. Coincidence? Publications expertise boosts publication output. J Surg Educ 2014;71:7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shashok K. Ethical contributions to research articles by medical writers. Anesth Analg 2013;116:500-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010;11:32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/ [Last accessed 14 April 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Phillips SG, Carey LA, Biedermann G. Attitudes toward writing and writing assistance in peer-reviewed articles. AMWA J 2001;16:10-16
   Google Scholar
• Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatol Int 2012;33:277-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One 2011;6:e23477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? Medsc Gen Med 2007;9:16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton CW. Don’t get spooked! How to collaborate with a professional medical communicator (and avoid ghostwriting). Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2010;58:255-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das N, Das S. Hiring a professional medical writer: is it equivalent to ghostwriting? Biochem Medica 2014;24:19-24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager E, Woolley K, Adshead V, et al. Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar