One-year and long-term molecular response to nilotinib and dasatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison

References

• Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Eng J Med 2010;362:2251-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Eng J Med 2010;362:2260-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia 2012;26:2197-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, et al. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood 2012;119:1123-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Jung-Munkwitz S, et al. Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-alpha in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1634-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne G, Dulucq S, Nicolini FE, et al. Achieving deeper molecular response is associated with a better clinical outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on imatinib front-line therapy. Haematologica 2014;99:458-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehlmann R, Muller MC, Lauseker M, et al. Deep molecular response is reached by the majority of patients treated with imatinib, predicts survival, and is achieved more quickly by optimized high-dose imatinib: results from the randomized CML-study IV. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:415-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes J, Hochhaus A, Kim D, et al. Four-Year (Yr) Follow-Up Of Patients (Pts) With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Receiving Dasatinib Or Imatinib: Efficacy Based On Early Response. 55th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 9, 2013; New Orleans, LA
   Google Scholar
• Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health 2012;15:940-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health 2011;14:429-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, et al. Indirect Treatment Comparison/Network Meta-Analysis Study Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report. Value Health 2014;17:157-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, et al. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:683-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Yu AP, et al. Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. PharmacoEconomics. 2010;28:935-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erder MH, Xie J, Signorovitch JE, et al. Cost effectiveness of guanfacine extended-release versus atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: application of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2012;10:381-95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Betts KA, et al. Comparative efficacy of nilotinib and dasatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of randomized trials. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:1263-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorovitch J, Ayyagari R, Reichmann WM, et al. Major molecular response during the first year of dasatinib, imatinib or nilotinib treatment for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a network meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2013;40:285-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radich JP, Kopecky KJ, Appelbaum FR, et al. A randomized trial of dasatinib 100 mg versus imatinib 400 mg in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2012;120:3898-905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Version 1.2015). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cml.pdf [Last accessed 24 October 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Eng J Med 2006;355:2408-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci I, Saglio G, Rosti G, et al. Achieving a major molecular response at the time of a complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) predicts a better duration of CCgR in imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3037-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palandri F, Iacobucci I, Soverini S, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib: importance of a stable molecular response. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:1059-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, Jones D, et al. Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase receiving high-dose or standard-dose imatinib therapy. Blood 18 2009;113:6315-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar