Perspectives in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Bibliography

• Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1860-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:21-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood 2009;113:5412-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss BM, Abadie J, Verma P, et al. A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple myeloma in most patients. Blood 2009;113:5418-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blade J, Rosinol L, Cibeira MT. Are all myelomas preceded by MGUS? Blood 2009;113:5370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma. Recent Results Cancer Res 2011;183:25-35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Dickman PW, et al. Patterns of survival in multiple myeloma: a population-based study of patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1993-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2008;111:2521-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 2008;111:2516-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Attal M, Roussel M. Shifts in the therapeutic paradigm for patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma: maintenance therapy and overall survival. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17(6):1253-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, et al. Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 2010;376:2075-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos MV, Oriol A, Martinez-Lopez J, et al. Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:934-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Improvement in survival of older adults with multiple myeloma: results of an updated period analysis of SEER data. Oncologist 2011;16:1600-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 2012;26:149-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durie BG, Kyle RA, Belch A, et al. Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. Hematol J 2003;4:379-98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terpos E, Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA. Advances in imaging and the management of myeloma bone disease. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1907-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 2003;121:749-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 1975;36:842-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3412-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snozek CL, Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, et al. Prognostic value of the serum free light chain ratio in newly diagnosed myeloma: proposed incorporation into the international staging system. Leukemia 2008;22:1933-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob C, Sterz J, Liebisch P, et al. Incorporation of the bone marker carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen improves prognostic information of the International Staging System in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2008;22:1767-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durie BG. The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:1539-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1046-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson KC. Oncogenomics to target myeloma in the bone marrow microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:1225-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman GD. Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. Leukemia 2009;23:435-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hideshima T, Mitsiades C, Tonon G, et al. Understanding multiple myeloma pathogenesis in the bone marrow to identify new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:585-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman MA, Lawrence MS, Keats JJ, et al. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature 2011;471:467-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd KD, Walker BA, Wardell CP, et al. High expression levels of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor DEPTOR are predictive of response to thalidomide in myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2010;51:2126-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:295-304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Wardell CP, Chiecchio L, et al. Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. Blood 2011;117:553-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Garcia E, Popovic R, Min DJ, et al. The MMSET histone methyl transferase switches global histone methylation and alters gene expression in t(4;14) multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2011;117:211-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Li C, Magrangeas F, et al. Prognostic significance of copy-number alterations in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4585-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi M, Pitari MR, Amodio N, et al. miR-29b negatively regulates human osteoclastic cell differentiation and function: implications for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. J Cell Physiol 2012; Epub ahead of print
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio N, Di Martino MT, Foresta U, et al. miR-29b sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to bortezomib-induced apoptosis through the activation of a feedback loop with the transcription factor Sp1. Cell Death Dis 2012;3:e436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio N, Leotta M, Bellizzi D, et al. DNA-demethylating and anti-tumor activity of synthetic miR-29b mimics in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2012;3:1246-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri P, Rossi M, Di Martino MT, et al. Promises and challenges of MicroRNA-based treatment of multiple myeloma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2012;12:838-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lionetti M, Agnelli L, Lombardi L, et al. MicroRNAs in the pathobiology of multiple myeloma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2012;12:823-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies FE, Dring AM, Li C, et al. Insights into the multistep transformation of MGUS to myeloma using microarray expression analysis. Blood 2003;102:4504-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordsmeier B, et al. Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2002;99:1745-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrangeas F, Nasser V, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma reveals molecular portraits in relation to the pathogenesis of the disease. Blood 2003;101:4998-5006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan F, Huang Y, Colla S, et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;108:2020-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy JD Jr, Zhan F, Burington BE, et al. A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood 2007;109:2276-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decaux O, Lode L, Magrangeas F, et al. Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Prediction of survival in multiple myeloma based on gene expression profiles reveals cell cycle and chromosomal instability signatures in high-risk patients and hyperdiploid signatures in low-risk patients: a study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4798-805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichiorri F, Suh SS, Ladetto M, et al. MicroRNAs regulate critical genes associated with multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105(35):12885-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Leone PE, Chiecchio L, et al. A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. Blood 2010;116:e56-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Wardell CP, Chiecchio L, et al. Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. Blood 2011;117:553-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez D, van der Burg M, García-Sanz R, et al. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Blood 2007;110:3112-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM, Zhan F, et al. Cyclin D dysregulation: an early and unifying pathogenic event in multiple myeloma. Blood 2005;106:296-303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Clinical implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13 in myeloma patients treated with high-dose therapy. Blood 2005;106:2837-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez NC, Castellanos MV, Martin ML, et al. Prognostic and biological implications of genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: t(4;14) is the most relevant adverse prognostic factor, whereas RB deletion as a unique abnormality is not associated with adverse prognosis. Leukemia 2007;21:143-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor P, Kumar S, Fonseca R, et al. Impact of risk stratification on outcome among patients with multiple myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Blood 2009;114:518-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Drach J, et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia 2009;23:2210-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc 2005;80:1371-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facon T, Mary JY, Harousseau JL, et al. Front-line or rescue autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) following a first course of high dose melphalan (HDM) in multiple myeloma (MM). Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial (CIAM) protocol. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 1996;88(Suppl 1):685a
   Google Scholar
• Fermand JP, Ravaud P, Chevret S, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial. Blood 1998;92:3131-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SK, Mikhael JR, Buadi FK, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84:1095-110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blade J, Dimopoulos M, Rosinol L, et al. Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:690-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2582-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 2010;24:1121-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AK, Richardson PG, San-Miguel JF. How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients. Blood 2009;114:5436-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myélome. N Engl J Med 1996;335:91-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fermand JP, Katsahian S, Divine M, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9227-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:929-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, et al. Intermediate dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50–70: results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood 2004;104:3052-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet 2007;370:1209-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Sezer O, Kyle R, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma patients ineligible for standard high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2009;23:1716-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, et al. Prospective comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by dose-reduced allograft (IFM99-03 trial) with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (IFM99-04 trial) in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;107:3474-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosinol L, Perez-Simon JA, Sureda A, et al. A prospective PETHEMA study of tandem autologous transplantation versus autograft followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2008;112:3591-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno B, Rotta M, Patriarca F, et al. Nonmyeloablative allografting for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the experience of the Gruppo Italiano Trapianti di Midollo. Blood 2009;113:3375-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morabito F, Gentile M, Mazzone C, et al. Therapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in the era of novel drugs. Eur J Haematol 2010;85:181-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV, Rosinol L, Hussein M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2171-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS, et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:29-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4621-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf I, van der Holt B, et al. HOVON-65/GMMGHD4 randomized phase III trial comparing bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (PAD) vs VAD followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) and maintenance with bortezomib or thalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2010;116:23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder CB, Reece DE, Kukreti V, et al. Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: high response rates in a phase II clinical trial. Leukemia 2009;23:1337-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;116:679-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokhorst HM, van der Holt B, Zweegman S, et al. A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;115:1113-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, et al. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. Blood 2011;118:1231-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harousseau JL, Avet-Loiseau H, Mary J, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib plus thalidomide-dexamethasone as induction prior to autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed myeloma. Haematologica (EHA annual meeting abstracts) 2010;95(Suppl 2):451
   Google Scholar
• Rosiñol L, Cibeira MT, Mateos MV, et al. A phase III PETHEMA/GEM study of induction therapy prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma: Superiority of VTD (bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone) over TD and VBMCP/VBAD plus bortezomib. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2010;116:139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau P, Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2011;118:5752-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SK, Flinn I, Noga SJ, et al. Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study. Leukemia 2010;24:1350-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;119:4375-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig H, Viterbo L, Greil R, et al. Phase II study of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone/-cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM): Safety and activity including evaluation of MRD. Haematologica (EHA annual meeting abstracts) 2010;95(Suppl 2):149-50
   Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Anaissie E, van Rhee F, et al. Incorporating bortezomib into upfront treatment for multiple myeloma: early results of total therapy 3. Br J Haematol 2007;138:176-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rhee F, Szymonifka J, Anaissie E, et al. Total therapy 3 for multiple myeloma: prognostic implications of cumulative dosing and premature discontinuation of VTD maintenance components, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, relevant to all phases of therapy. Blood 2010;116:1220-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair B, van Rhee F, Shaughnessy JD Jr, et al. Superior results of Total Therapy 3 (2003-33) in gene expression profiling-defined low-risk multiple myeloma confirmed in subsequent trial 2006-66 with VRD maintenance. Blood 2010;115:4168-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;116:679-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Jacobus S, Rajkumar SV, et al. Outcome with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone followed by early autologous stem cell transplantation in the ECOG E4A03 randomized clinical trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2010;116:38
   Google Scholar
• Kumar SK, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Early versus delayed autologous transplantation after immunomodulatory agents-based induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Cancer 2012;118:1585-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Cavallo F, Hardan I, et al. Melphalan/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (MPR) Versus High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Transplantation (MEL200) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients <65 Years: Results of a Randomized Phase III Study. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2011;118:3069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randomized trial of lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone vs high-dose treatment with SCT in MM patients up to age 65 (IFM/DFCI2009). Available from: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01208662?term_nct01208662&rank_1 [Accessed 12 December 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Study to compare VMP with HDM followed by VRD consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (HO95). Available from: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01208766 [Accessed 12 December 2011]
   Google Scholar
• A phase 3, multicentre, randomized, controlled study to determine the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (CRD) versus melphalan (200 mg/m2) followed by stem cell transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma subjects. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01091831
   Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2495-502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavo M, Tosi P, Zamagni E, et al. Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: bologna 96 clinical study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2434-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, et al. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome, Southwest Oncology Group, and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1209-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Liberati AM, et al. Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood 2008;112:3107-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:825-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet 2007;370:1209-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijermans P, Schaafsma M, Termorshuizen F, et al. Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3160-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulin C, Facon T, Rodon P, et al. Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3664-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;116:1405-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood 2011;118:1239-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:906-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos MV, Richardson PG, Schlag R, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone compared with melphalan and prednisone in previously untreated multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and impact of subsequent therapy in the phase III VISTA trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2259-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Dimopoulos MA, Delforge M, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1759-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D, et al. Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:5101-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;119:4375-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;116:679-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Jagannath S, et al. Final results of a frontline phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (CRd) in multiple myeloma (MM). Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:631
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Gay F, Falco P, et al. Bortezomib as induction before autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide as consolidation-maintenance in untreated multiple myeloma patients. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:800-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Lauwers V, Marit G, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1782-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellqvist UH, Westin J, Gimsing P, et al. Improved response rate with bortezomib consolidation after high dose melphalan: First results of a Nordic Myeloma Study Group randomized phase III trial. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2009;114:221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladetto M, Pagliano G, Ferrero S, et al. Major tumor shrinking and persistent molecular remissions after consolidation with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with autografted myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2077-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;108:3289-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer A, Prince HM, Roberts AW, et al. Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1788-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavo M, Pantani L, Petrucci MT, et al. Bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone is superior to thalidomide-dexamethasone as consolidation therapy following autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, et al. The addition of thalidomide to the induction treatment of newly presenting myeloma patients increases the CR rate which is likely to translate into improved PFS and OS. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2009;114:149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AK, Trudel S, Bahlis NJ, et al. A randomized phase III trial of thalidomide and prednisone as maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM): The NCIC CTG MY.10 trial. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2010;116:23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Anaissie E, Haessler J, et al. Complete remission sustained 3 years from treatment initiation is a powerful surrogate for extended survival in multiple myeloma. Cancer 2008;113:355-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Tricot G, Anaissie E, et al. Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1021-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Attal M, Crowley J, et al. Long-term follow-up of autotransplantation trials for multiple myeloma: update of protocols conducted by the intergroupe francophone du myelome, southwest oncology group, and university of arkansas for medical sciences. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1209-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offidani M, Corvatta L, Polloni C, et al. Thalidomide-dexamethasone versus interferon-alpha-dexamethasone as maintenance treatment after ThaDD induction for multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicentre, randomised study. Br J Haematol 2009;144:653-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Ast C, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, van Heteren P, et al. Improved progression-free survival and overall survival with thalidomide maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in 2274 patients. Haematologica (EHA Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2010;95:0942
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Gregory WM, Davies FE, et al. The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis. Blood 2012;119:7-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;108:3289-894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1770-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Adam Z, Kropff M, et al. A Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Lenalidomide (Len) combined with melphalan and prednisone followed by continuous lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R) in patients (Pts) ≥ 65 years (Yrs) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): updated results for Pts Aged 65–75 Yrs enrolled in MM-015. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:475
   Google Scholar
• Bringhen S, Larocca A, Rossi D, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2010;116:4745-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corso A, Mangiacavalli S, Varettoni M, et al. Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a comparison between previously treated and untreated patients. Leuk Res 2010;34:471-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Xie W, Mitsiades C, et al. Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma: efficacy, characterization of peripheral neuropathy, and molecular correlations with response and neuropathy. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3518-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau P, Pylypenko H, Grosicki S, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:431-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier M, Le Gal G, Tay J, et al. Rates of venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy with thalidomide or lenalidomide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9:653-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma. Leukemia 2008;22:414-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Reece DE, Siegel D, et al. Expanded safety experience with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2009;146:164-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig H, Beksac M, Blade J, et al. Current multiple myeloma treatment strategies with novel agents: a European perspective. Oncologist 2010;15:6-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Soulier J, Fermand JP, et al. Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Leukemia 2010;24:623-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Roussel M, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) myeloma but not outcome of patients with del(17p). J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4630-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neben K, Lokhorst HM, Jauch A, et al. Combining information regarding chromosomal aberrations t(4;14), Del(17p13) and the copy number of 1q21 with the international staging system classification allows stratification of myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the HOVON-65/GMMG HD4 Trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:332
   Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Jakubowiak AJ, et al. Phase II trial of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients (pts) with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Updated efficacy and safety data after _2 years of follow-up. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2010;116:1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Treatment of multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2009;9:278-88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• San Miguel J, Harousseau JL, Joshua D, Anderson KC. Individualizing treatment of patients with myeloma in the era of novel agents. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2761-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AK, Chang H, Trudel S, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of t(4;14) in multiple myeloma and evidence for clonal evolution. Leukemia 2007;21:2358-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer FW, Bila J, Buck I, et al. Delineation of distinct subgroups of multiple myeloma and a model for clonal evolution based on interphase cytogenetics. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005;44:194-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chng WJ, Ketterling RP, Fonseca R. Analysis of genetic abnormalities provides insights into genetic evolution of hyperdiploid myeloma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006;45:1111-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy JD Jr, Qu P, Usmani S, et al. Pharmacogenomics of bortezomib test-dosing identifies hyperexpression of proteasome genes, especially PSMD4, as novel high-risk feature in myeloma treated with Total Therapy 3. Blood 2011;118:3512-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buda G, Ricci D, Huang CC, et al. Polymorphisms in the multiple drug resistance protein 1 and in P-glycoprotein 1 are associated with time to event outcomes in patients with advanced multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Ann Hematol 2010;89:1133-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojima M, Maruyama R, Yasui H, et al. Genomic screening for genes silenced by DNA methylation revealed an association between RASD1 inactivation and dexamethasone resistance in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:4356-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hideshima T, Mitsiades C, Tonon G, et al. Understanding multiple myeloma pathogenesis in the bone marrow to identify new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:585-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lü S, Chen Z, Yang J, et al. Overexpression of the PSMB5 gene contributes to bortezomib resistance in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia cells derived from Jurkat line. Exp Hematol 2008;36:1278-84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lü S, Yang J, Chen Z, et al. Different mutants of PSMB5 confer varying bortezomib resistance in T lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia cells derived from the Jurkat cell line. Exp Hematol 2009;37:831-17
   Google Scholar
• Lü S, Yang J, Song X, et al. Point mutation of the proteasome beta5 subunit gene is an important mechanism of bortezomib resistance in bortezomib-selected variants of Jurkat T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia line. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008;326:423-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans R, Franke NE, Assaraf YG, et al. Molecular basis of bortezomib resistance: proteasome subunit beta5 (PSMB5) gene mutation and overexpression of PSMB5 protein. Blood 2008;112:2489-99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund CC, Aukerman SL, Lopez-Girona A, et al. Targeting the Wnt/{beta}-Catenin signaling pathway and CD44-mediated adhesion as a rational approach to overcome lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:928
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn DJ, Chen Q, Voorhees PM, et al. Potent activity of carfilzomib, a novel, irreversible inhibitor of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, against preclinical models of multiple myeloma. Blood 2007;110:3281-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MK, Kirk CJ. Development of proteasome inhibitors in oncology and autoimmune diseases. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2008;11:616-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlati F, Lee SJ, Aujay M, et al. Carfilzomib can induce tumor cell death through selective inhibition of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome. Blood 2009;114:3439-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vij R, Wang M, Kaufman JL, et al. An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 (PX-171-004) study of single-agent carfilzomib in bortezomib-naive patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vij R, Siegel DS, Kaufman JL, et al. Results of an ongoing open-label, phase II study of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) [abstract 8000]. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(15s):573s
   Google Scholar
• Singhal S, Siegel DS, Martin T, et al. Integrated safety from phase 2 studies of monotherapy carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM): an updated analysis [abstract 1876]. Blood 2011;118(21):819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowiak AJ, Martin T, Singhal S, et al. Responses to single-agent carfilzomib (CFZ) are not affected by cytogenetics in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) [abstract 117]. Ann Oncol 2011;22(Suppl 4):iv122
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Phase 3 study comparing carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRd) vs lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in subjects with relapsed multiple myeloma, US National Library of Medicine. 2011. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01080391 [Last accessed 30 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Sonneveld P, Hacker E, Zweegman S, et al. Carfilzomib combined with thalidomide and dexamethasone (CARTHADEX) as induction treatment prior to high-dose melphalan (HDM) in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A trial of the European Myeloma Network EMN [abstract 633]. Blood 2011;118(21):290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhael J, Reeder CB, Libby EN, et al. A phase I/II trial of cyclophosphamide, carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CYCLONE) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol (2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30(15_Suppl):8010
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Jagannath S, et al. Final results of a frontline phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (CRd) in multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract 631]. Blood 2011;118(12):288-9
   Google Scholar
• Korde N, Zingone A, Kwok M, et al. Phase II clinical and correlative study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. J Clin Oncol (2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30(15_Suppl):e18568
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan D, Singh AV, Aujay M, et al. A novel orally active proteasome inhibitor ONX 0912 triggers in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;116:4906-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdeja JG, Richardson PG, Lonial S, et al. Phase 1/2 study of oral MLN9708, a novel, investigational proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract 479]. Blood 2011;118(21):223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Bensinger WI, Reeder CB, et al. Weekly dosing of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): A phase I study. J Clin Oncol (2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30(15_Suppl):803
   Google Scholar
• Lonial S, Baz RC, Wang M, et al. Phase I study of twice-weekly dosing of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). J Clin Oncol (2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30, 15_Suppl):8017
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan D, Singh AV, Ciccarelli B, et al. Combination of novel proteasome inhibitor NPI-0052 and lenalidomide trigger in vitro and in vivo synergistic cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;115:834-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan D, Catley L, Li G, et al. A novel orally active proteasome inhibitor induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells with mechanisms distinct from Bortezomib. Cancer Cell 2005;8:407-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Spencer A, Cannell P, et al. Phase 1 clinical evaluation of twice-weekly Marizomib (NpI-0052), a novel proteasome inhibitor, in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Blood 2011;118:302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Bang YJ, Robertson KD. Histone deacetylase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Epigenetics 2006;1:14-23
   Google Scholar
• Hideshima T, Bradner JE, Wong J, et al. Small-molecule inhibition of proteasome and aggresome function induces synergistic antitumor activity in multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:8567-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catley L, Weisberg E, Kiziltepe T, et al. Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and alpha-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells. Blood 2006;108:3441-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades NS, McMullan CJ, et al. Transcriptional signature of histone deacetylase inhibition in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:540-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David E, Schafer-Hales K, Marcus AI, et al. Combination of bortezomib with tipifarnib (R115777) induces synergistic myeloma cell apoptosis via down-regulation of HDAC6 and inhibition of aggresome formation. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2007;110:1520
   Google Scholar
• Hideshima T, Richardson PG, Anderson KC. Mechanism of action of proteasome inhibitors and deacetylase inhib-itors and the biological basis of synergy in multiple myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10:2034-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber DM, Jagannath S, Sobecks R, et al. Vorinostat plus bortezomib in MM: a phase I study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2009;9(S44):A248
   Google Scholar
• Weber DM, Badros A, Jagannath S, et al. Vorinostat and bortezomib in relapsed/refractory MM. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2009;9(S42):A242
   Google Scholar
• Jagannath S, Weber D, Sobecks R, et al. The combination of vorinostat and bortezomib provides long-term responses in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2009;114:3886
   Google Scholar
• Siegel D, Dimopoulos MA, Yoon SS, et al. Vantage 095: vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in salvage multiple myeloma patients: final study results of a global phase 2b trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:480
   Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos MA, Jagannath S, Yoon SS, et al. Vantage 088: vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results of a global, randomized phase 3 trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:811
   Google Scholar
• San Miguel J, Sezer O, Siegel D, et al. A phase IB dose-escalation study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) and IV bortezomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica (EHA annual meeting abstracts) 2010;95(Suppl2):155-0384
   Google Scholar
• San-Miguel J, de Moraes Hungria VT, Yoon SS, et al. Update on a Phase III Study of Panobinostat with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: PANORAMA 1. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:3976
   Google Scholar
• Alsina M, Schlossman RL, Weber DM, et al. PANORAMA 2: A phase II study of panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol (2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30(15_Suppl):8012
   Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Sezer O, San-Miguel JF, et al. A phase IB, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) and I.V. bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2008;112:2781
   Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Alsina M, Weber DM, et al. PANORAMA 2: Panobinostat combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:1852
   Google Scholar
• Badros A, Burger AM, Philip S, et al. Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:5250-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah JJ, Thomas SK, Weber DM, et al. Phase 1/1b study of the efficacy and safety of the combination of panobinostat + carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:4081
   Google Scholar
• A multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled phase III study of panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01023308 [Accessed 26 March 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Richter JR, Bilotti E, McBride L, et al. Salvage therapy with vorinostat, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (ZRD) in lenalidomide/dexamethasone relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:3986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raje N, Hari PN, Vogl DT, et al. Rocilinostat (ACY-1215), a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, alone and in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma: preliminary results from the first-in-humans phase I/II study. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:4061
   Google Scholar
• Streetly MJ, Gyertson K, Daniel Y, et al. Alternate day pomalidomide retains anti-myeloma effect with reduced adverse events and evidence of in vivo immunomodulation. Br J Haematol 2008;141:41-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schey SA, Fields P, Bartlett JB, et al. Phase I study of an immunomodulatory thalidomide analog, CC-4047, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3269-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galustian C, Meyer B, Labarthe MC, et al. The anti-cancer agents lenalidomide and pomalidomide inhibit the proliferation and function of T regulatory cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009;58:1033-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhelle D, Corral LG, Wong K, et al. Lenalidomide and CC-4047 inhibit the proliferation of malignant B cells while expanding normal CD34+ progenitor cells. Cancer Res 2007;67:746-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalapour S, Zelmer A, Pfau M, et al. The thalidomide analogue, CC-4047, induces apoptosis signaling and growth arrest in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:5526-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi AK, Kang J, Capone L, et al. Dexamethasone synergizes with lenalidomide to inhibit multiple myeloma tumor growth, but reduces lenalidomide-induced immunomodulation of T and NK cell function. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2010;10:155-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Gertz MA, et al. Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low-dose dexamethasone as therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5008-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy MQ, Allred JB, Gertz MA, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual-refractory disease. Blood 2011;118:2970-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Gertz MA, et al. Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low-dose dexamethasone as therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5008-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy MQ, Allred JB, Gertz MA, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual-refractory disease. Blood 2011;118:2970-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leleu X, Attal M, Arnulf B, et al. Pomalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in bortezomib and lenalidomide refractory multiple myeloma: IFM 2009-02. Blood 2013; Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Siegel D, Baz R, et al. Phase I study of pomalidomide MTD, safety and efficacy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma who have received lenalidomide and bortezomib. Blood 2012; Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Farag SS, Zhang S, Jansak BS, et al. Phase II trial of temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2009;33:1475-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther A, Baumann P, Burger R, et al. Phase I/II study with single agent everolimus (RAD001) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2009;114:3850
   Google Scholar
• Raje N, Kumar S, Hideshima T, et al. Combination of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and CC-5013 has synergistic activity in multiple myeloma. Blood 2004;104:4188-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobrial IM, Weller E, Vij R, et al. Weekly bortezomib in combination with temsirolimus in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:263-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahindra A, Richardson PG, Hari P, et al. Updated results of a phase I study of RAD001 in combination with lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic analysis. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2010;116:3051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades NS, McMullan CJ, et al. Antimyeloma activity of heat shock protein-90 inhibition. Blood 2006;107:1092-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson J, Palombella VJ, Fritz C, et al. IPI-504, a novel and soluble HSP-90 inhibitor, blocks the unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008;61:923-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillin DW, Negri J, Delmore J, et al. Activity of new heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) inhibitor NVP-AUY922 against myeloma cells sensitive and resistant to conventional agents. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2007;110:1587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Chanan-Khan AA, Alsina M, et al. Tanespimycin monotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma: results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study. Br J Haematol 2010;150:438-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Chanan-Khan AA, Lonial S, et al. Tanespimycin + bortezomib demonstrates safety, activity, and effective target inhibition in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients: updated results of a phase 1/2 study. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2009;114:2890
   Google Scholar
• Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades NS, McMullan CJ, et al. Antimyeloma activity of heat shock protein-90 inhibition. Blood 2006;107:1092-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Badros AZ, Jagannath S, et al. Tanespimycin with bortezomib: activity in relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2010;150:428-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hideshima T, Catley L, Yasui H, et al. Perifosine, an oral bioactive novel alkylphospholipid, inhibits Akt and induces in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2006;107:4053-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David E, Sinha R, Chen J, et al. Perifosine synergistically enhances TRAIL-induced myeloma cell apoptosis via up-regulation of death receptors. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5090-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hideshima T, Catley L, Yasui H, et al. Perifosine, an oral bioactive novel alkylphospholipid, inhibits Akt and induces in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2006;107:4053-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson P, Lonial S, Jakubowiak A, et al. Multi-center phase II study of perifosine (KRX-0401) alone and in combination with dexamethasone (dex) for patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): promising activity as combination therapy with manageable toxicity. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2007;110:1164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Wolf J, Jakubowiak A, et al. Perifosine plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with bortezomib: results of a multicenter phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:4243-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowiak A, Richardson P, Zimmerman T, et al. Perifosine plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a Phase I Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium study. Br J Haematol 2012; Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assessment of efficacy and safety of perifosine, bortezomib and dexamethasone in multiple myeloma patients, US National Library of Medicine. 2011. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01002248 [Last accessed on 30 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Tai YT, Dillon M, Song W, et al. Anti-CS1 humanized monoclonal antibody HuLuc63 inhibits myeloma cell adhesion and induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in the bone marrow milieu. Blood 2008;112:1329-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai YT, Dillon M, Song W, et al. Anti-CS1 humanized monoclonal antibody HuLuc63 inhibits myeloma cell adhesion and induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in the bone marrow milieu. Blood 2008;112:1329-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rhee F, Szmania SM, Dillon M, et al. Combinatorial efficacy of anti-CS1 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab (HuLuc63) and bortezomib against multiple myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:2616-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonder JA, Mohrbacher AF, Singhal S, et al. A phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study of elotuzumab in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Blood 2011; Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowiak AJ, Benson DM, Bensinger W, et al. Phase I trial of anti-cs1 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2012; Epub ahead of print
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1953-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Moreau P, et al. A phase 2 study of elotuzumab (Elo) in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Ld) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM): updated results. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:202
   Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos MA, Facon T, Richardson PG, et al. ELOQUENT-1: a phase III, randomized, open-label trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone with or without elotuzumab in subjects with previously untreated multiple myeloma (CA204-006). J Clin Oncol (2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30(15_Suppl):8113
   Google Scholar
• Voorhees PM, Chen Q, Small GW, et al. Targeted inhibition of interleukin-6 with CNTO 328 sensitizes pre-clinical models of multiple myeloma to dexamethasone-mediated cell death. Br J Haematol 2009;145:481-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorhees PM, Manges RF, Sonneveld P, et al. A phase 2 multicenter study of siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:3971
   Google Scholar
• A phase I/IIa study of human anti-CD38 antibody MOR03087 in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, US National Library of Medicine. 2011. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01421186 [Last accessed 30 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Jagannath S, Chanan-Khan AA, Heffner LT, et al. BT062, An antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD138, shows clinical activity in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011;118:305
   Google Scholar
• Diehl V, Cheson BD. Bendamustine in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Introduction. Semin Oncol 2002;29:1-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pönisch W, Mitrou PS, Merkle K, et al. Treatment of bendamustine and prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma results in superior complete response rate, prolonged time to treatment failure and improved quality of life compared to treatment with melphalan and prednisone–a randomized phase III study of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006;132:205-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop S, Straka C, Haen M, et al. The efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in recurrent multiple myeloma after high dose chemotherapy. Haematologica 2005;90:1287-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pönisch W, Rozanski M, Goldschmidt H, et al. Combined bendamustine, prednisolone and thalidomide for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation or conventional chemotherapy: results of a Phase I clinical trial. Br J Haematol 2008;143:191-200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentzsch S, O'Sullivan A, Kennedy RC, et al. Combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (BLD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is feasible and highly effective: results of phase 1/2 open-label, dose escalation study. Blood 2012;119:4608-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi S, Pozzi S, Badiali S, et al. A phase I/II study of bendamustine, low-dose dexamethasone, and lenalidomide (BdL) for the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:1851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodon P, Hulin C, Pegourie B, et al. Bendamustine, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVD) in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) 2009-01 protocol. J Clin Oncol (ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings) 2012;30:8014
   Google Scholar
• Pönisch W, Bourgeois M, Moll B, et al. Combined bendamustine, prednisone and bortezomib (BPV) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2012; Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Berenson JR, Yellin O, Bessudo A, et al. Phase I/II trial assessing bendamustine plus bortezomib combination therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2013;160:321-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offidani M, Corvatta L, Caraffa P, et al. Bendamustine, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVD) combination for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: an interim analysis of a phase II study. Haematologica (EHA Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;97:0858
   Google Scholar
• Berdeja JG, Savona MR, Essell J, et al. Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BBD) as first-line treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy: toxicity comparison of two dose schedules. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:4047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar