Genomic instability in multiple myeloma: mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Bibliography

• Zhan F, Huang Y, Colla S, et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;108:2020-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM. Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6333-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman MA, Lawrence MS, Keats JJ, et al. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature 2011;471:467-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Walker BA, Davies FE. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:335-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahlis NJ. Darwinian evolution and tiding clones in multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;120:927-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingone A, Kuehl WM. Pathogenesis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and progression to multiple myeloma. Semin Hematol 2011;48:4-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keats JJ, Chesi M, Egan JB, et al. Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;120:1067-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan JB, Shi CX, Tembe W, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides. Blood 2012;120:1060-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Wardell CP, Melchor L, et al. Intraclonal heterogeneity and distinct molecular mechanisms characterize the development of t(4;14) and t(11;14) myeloma. Blood 2012;120:1077-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrangeas F, Avet-Loiseau H, Gouraud W, et al. Minor clone provides a reservoir for relapse in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2013;27:473-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Leone PE, Chiecchio L, et al. A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. Blood 2010;116:e56-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson T, Hoglund M, Lenhoff S, et al. A pooled analysis of karyotypic patterns, breakpoints and imbalances in 783 cytogenetically abnormal multiple myelomas reveals frequently involved chromosome segments as well as significant age- and sex-related differences. Br J Haematol 2003;120:960-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chng WJ, Ketterling RP, Fonseca R. Analysis of genetic abnormalities provides insights into genetic evolution of hyperdiploid myeloma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006;45:1111-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smadja NV, Bastard C, Brigaudeau C, et al. Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood 2001;98:2229-38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R, et al. Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Res 2004;64:1546-58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smadja NV, Fruchart C, Isnard F, et al. Chromosomal analysis in multiple myeloma: cytogenetic evidence of two different diseases. Leukemia 1998;12:960-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL. Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:175-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM. Chromosome translocations in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 2001;20:5611-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca R, Blood EA, Oken MM, et al. Myeloma and the t(11;14)(q13;q32); evidence for a biologically defined unique subset of patients. Blood 2002;99:3735-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesi M, Nardini E, Lim RS, et al. The t(4;14) translocation in myeloma dysregulates both FGFR3 and a novel gene, MMSET, resulting in IgH/MMSET hybrid transcripts. Blood 1998;92:3025-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santra M, Zhan F, Tian E, et al. A subset of multiple myeloma harboring the t(4;14)(p16;q32) translocation lacks FGFR3 expression but maintains an IGH/MMSET fusion transcript. Blood 2003;101:2374-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keats JJ, Reiman T, Maxwell CA, et al. In multiple myeloma, t(4;14)(p16;q32) is an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of FGFR3 expression. Blood 2003;101:1520-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood 2007;109:3489-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Malard F, Campion L, et al. Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor? Blood 2011;117:2009-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Gerson F, Magrangeas F, et al. Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene are present in 15% of primary human multiple myeloma tumors. Blood 2001;98:3082-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri A, Baldini L, Trecca D, et al. p53 gene mutations in multiple myeloma are associated with advanced forms of malignancy. Blood 1993;81:128-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach J, Ackermann J, Fritz E, et al. Presence of a p53 gene deletion in patients with multiple myeloma predicts for short survival after conventional-dose chemotherapy. Blood 1998;92:802-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrangeas F, Avet-Loiseau H, Munshi NC, Minvielle S. Chromothripsis identifies a rare and aggressive entity among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2011;118:675-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Li C, Magrangeas F, et al. Prognostic significance of copy-number alterations in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4585-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy JD Jr, Zhan F, Burington BE, et al. A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood 2007;109:2276-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decaux O, Lode L, Magrangeas F, et al. Prediction of survival in multiple myeloma based on gene expression profiles reveals cell cycle and chromosomal instability signatures in high-risk patients and hyperdiploid signatures in low-risk patients: a study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4798-805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broyl A, Hose D, Lokhorst H, et al. Gene expression profiling for molecular classification of multiple myeloma in newly diagnosed patients. Blood 2010;116:2543-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reme T, Hose D, Theillet C, Klein B. Modeling risk stratification in human cancer. Bioinformatics 2013;29:1149-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boveri T. Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris. J Cell Sci 2008;121(Suppl 1):1-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach FS, Nicolaides NC, Papadopoulos N, et al. Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell 1993;75:1215-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 1993;362:709-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellacosa A. Functional interactions and signaling properties of mammalian DNA mismatch repair proteins. Cell Death Differ 2001;8:1076-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P. Genes involved in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Anticancer Res 1994;14:1657-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallinger S, Aronson M, Shayan K, et al. Gastrointestinal cancers and neurofibromatosis type 1 features in children with a germline homozygous MLH1 mutation. Gastroenterology 2004;126:576-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst EM, van Steeg H, de Vries A. Nucleotide excision repair- and p53-deficient mouse models in cancer research. Mutat Res 2005;574:3-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeijmakers JH. Human nucleotide excision repair syndromes: molecular clues to unexpected intricacies. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:1912-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nance MA, Berry SA. Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases. Am J Med Genet 1992;42:68-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RD, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, Lindahl T. Human DNA repair genes. Science 2001;291:1284-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KK, Zhang QM, Dianov GL. Base excision repair fidelity in normal and cancer cells. Mutagenesis 2006;21:173-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Tassan N, Chmiel NH, Maynard J, et al. Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C–>T:a mutations in colorectal tumors. Nat Genet 2002;30:227-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkacz BW, Omidiji O, Gray DA, Shall S. (ADP-ribose)n participates in DNA excision repair. Nature 1980;283:593-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefferin ML, Tomkinson AE. Mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005;4:639-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanawalt PC. Paradigms for the three rs: DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Mol Cell 2007;28:702-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. Phosphatases join kinases in DNA-damage response pathways. Trends Cell Biol 2004;14:339-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng CX, Scott F. Role of the tumor suppressor gene Brca1 in genetic stability and mammary gland tumor formation. Oncogene 2000;19:1059-64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nathanson KL, Wooster R, Weber BL. Breast cancer genetics: what we know and what we need. Nat Med 2001;7:552-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med 2009;361:123-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri P, Ventura M, Baudi F, et al. BRCA1/2 genetic background-based therapeutic tailoring of human ovarian cancer: hope or reality? J Ovarian Res 2009;2:14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tassone P, Tagliaferri P, Perricelli A, et al. BRCA1 expression modulates chemosensitivity of BRCA1-defective HCC1937 human breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2003;88:1285-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassone P, Di Martino MT, Ventura M, et al. Loss of BRCA1 function increases the antitumor activity of cisplatin against human breast cancer xenografts in vivo. Cancer Biol Ther 2009;8:648-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005;434:917-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouleau M, Patel A, Hendzel MJ, et al. PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:293-301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting SF, Callen E, Wong N, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 2010;141:243-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothmer A, Robbiani DF, Di Virgilio M, et al. Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1. Mol Cell 2011;42:319-29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, Lottersberger F, Buonomo SB, et al. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection. Science 2013;339:700-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser KB. HDAC inhibitors: clinical update and mechanism-based potential. Biochem Pharmacol 2007;74:659-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PA, Baylin SB. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell 2007;128:683-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen SE. Gene silencing: maintaining methylation patterns. Curr Biol 1999;9:R617-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PL, Wolffe AP. Relationships between chromatin organization and DNA methylation in determining gene expression. Semin Cancer Biol 1999;9:339-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylin SB, Belinsky SA, Herman JG. Aberrant methylation of gene promoters in cancer–concepts, misconcepts, and promise. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1460-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B. Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature 1983;301:89-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshimo Y, Nakayama H, Ito R, et al. Promoter methylation of cyclin D2 gene in gastric carcinoma. Int J Oncol 2003;23:1663-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray SG, Ekstrom TJ. The human histone deacetylase family. Exp Cell Res 2001;262:75-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandolfi PP. Histone deacetylases and transcriptional therapy with their inhibitors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001;48(Suppl 1):S17-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda H, Sano N, Muto S, Horikoshi M. Simple histone acetylation plays a complex role in the regulation of gene expression. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2006;5:190-208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001;411:366-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefford CE, Irminger-Finger I. Mechanisms of chromosome instability in cancers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006;59:1-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent CI, Lundblad V. The telomerase reverse transcriptase: components and regulation. Genes Dev 1998;12:1073-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counter CM, Avilion AA, LeFeuvre CE, et al. Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J 1992;11:1921-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan TM, Englezou A, Gupta J, et al. Telomere elongation in immortal human cells without detectable telomerase activity. EMBO J 1995;14:4240-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerone MA, Londono-Vallejo JA, Bacchetti S. Telomere maintenance by telomerase and by recombination can coexist in human cells. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:1945-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Wardell CP, Chiecchio L, et al. Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. Blood 2011;117:553-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuck CJ, Mehta J, Bhagat T, et al. Myeloma is characterized by stage-specific alterations in DNA methylation that occur early during myelomagenesis. J Immunol 2013;190:2966-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreaux J, Reme T, Leonard W, et al. Development of gene expression-based score to predict sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells to DNA methylation inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 2012;11:2685-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente-Duenas C, Romero-Camarero I, Gonzalez-Herrero I, et al. A novel molecular mechanism involved in multiple myeloma development revealed by targeting MafB to haematopoietic progenitors. EMBO J 2012;31:3704-17
   Google Scholar
• Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R, et al. Methylation is an inactivating mechanism of the p16 gene in multiple myeloma associated with high plasma cell proliferation and short survival. Br J Haematol 2002;118:1034-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni MS, Daggett JL, Bender TP, et al. Frequent inactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p18 by homozygous deletion in multiple myeloma cell lines: ectopic p18 expression inhibits growth and induces apoptosis. Leukemia 2002;16:127-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo SQ, Hu JP, Qu Q, et al. The effects of promoter methylation on downregulation of DAZAP2 in multiple myeloma cell lines. PLoS One 2012;7:e40475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung S, Kim S, Gale M, et al. DNA methylation in multiple myeloma is weakly associated with gene transcription. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e52626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocemba KA, Groen RW, van Andel H, et al. Transcriptional silencing of the Wnt-antagonist DKK1 by promoter methylation is associated with enhanced Wnt signaling in advanced multiple myeloma. PloS One 2012;7:e30359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Wang J, Epner EM. Cyclin D1 activation in B-cell malignancy: association with changes in histone acetylation, DNA methylation, and RNA polymerase II binding to both promoter and distal sequences. Blood 2004;104:2505-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawagoe H, Humphries RK, Blair A, et al. Expression of HOX genes, HOX cofactors, and MLL in phenotypically and functionally defined subpopulations of leukemic and normal human hematopoietic cells. Leukemia 1999;13:687-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng B, Hurt EM, Hodge DR, et al. DNA hypermethylation and partial gene silencing of human thymine- DNA glycosylase in multiple myeloma cell lines. Epigenetics 2006;1:138-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Garcia E, Popovic R, Min DJ, et al. The MMSET histone methyl transferase switches global histone methylation and alters gene expression in t(4;14) multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2011;117:211-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito JL, Walker B, Jenner M, et al. MMSET deregulation affects cell cycle progression and adhesion regulons in t(4;14) myeloma plasma cells. Haematologica 2009;94:78-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei H, Zhang L, Luo K, et al. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature 2011;470:124-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas MA, Shmookler Reis RJ, Koley H, et al. Dysfunctional homologous recombination mediates genomic instability and progression in myeloma. Blood 2009;113:2290-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang CG, Garcia K, He C. Damage detection and base flipping in direct DNA alkylation repair. Chembiochem 2009;10:417-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden PJ, Tewari P, Morris DW, et al. Variation in DNA repair genes XRCC3, XRCC4, XRCC5 and susceptibility to myeloma. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16:3117-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Van der Sluis PC, Boulware D, et al. The FA/BRCA pathway is involved in melphalan-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair and accounts for melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2005;106:698-705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yarde DN, Oliveira V, Mathews L, et al. Targeting the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway circumvents drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res 2009;69:9367-75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousa MM, Zub KA, Aas PA, et al. An inverse switch in DNA base excision and strand break repair contributes to melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e55493
   Google Scholar
• Koduru S, Wong E, Strowig T, et al. Dendritic cell-mediated activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-dependent induction of genomic instability in human myeloma. Blood 2012;119:2302-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, et al. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 2000;102:553-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, et al. Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 2006;66:8109-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeng EA, Carlson LM, Gutman DM, et al. Proteasome inhibitors induce a terminal unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2006;107:4907-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi G, Oliva L, Cascio P, et al. The proteasome load versus capacity balance determines apoptotic sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells to proteasome inhibition. Blood 2009;113:3040-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri P, Ren L, Gratton K, et al. Bortezomib-induced "BRCAness" sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to PARP inhibitors. Blood 2011;118:6368-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri P, Bahlis NJ, Lonial S. Panobinostat for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2012;21:733-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos MA, Jagannath S, Yoon S-S, et al. Vantage 088: vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results of a global, randomized phase 3 trial. ASH Annu Meet Abstr 2011. 118:811
   Google Scholar
• Kiziltepe T, Hideshima T, Catley L, et al. 5-Azacytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, induces ATR-mediated DNA double-strand break responses, apoptosis, and synergistic cytotoxicity with doxorubicin and bortezomib against multiple myeloma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6:1718-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:15805-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004;116:281-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio N, Leotta M, Bellizzi D, et al. DNA-demethylating and anti-tumor activity of synthetic miR-29b mimics in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2012;3:1246-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar