Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery for cancer

Bibliography

• Ter Haar G, Coussios C. High intensity focused ultrasound: physical principles and devices. Int J Hyperthermia 2007;23(2):89-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JE. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5(4):321-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng M, Liu X, Liu Y, Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92(8):1092-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov DL, Bailey MR, Crum LA. Dual-pulse lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(7):1045-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reher P, Elbeshir ENI, Harvey W, The stimulation of bone formation in vitro by therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23(8):1251-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34(5):834-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromi S, Frenkel V, Luk A, Pulsed-High Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Low Temperature–Sensitive Liposomes for Enhanced Targeted Drug Delivery and Antitumor Effect. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(9):2722-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussios CC, Roy RA. Applications of acoustics and cavitation to noninvasive therapy and drug delivery. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2008;40:395-420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Coussios CC, McAdory LE, Correlation of cavitation with ultrasound enhancement of thrombolysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(8):1257-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okita M, Nakano J, Kataoka H, Effects of therapeutic ultrasound on joint mobility and collagen fibril arrangement in the endomysium of immobilized rat soleus muscle. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35(2):237-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson KD, Lai CY, Qin S, Ultrasound increases nanoparticle delivery by reducing intratumoral pressure and increasing transport in epithelial and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) tumors. Cancer Res 2012;72:1485-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara KW. Driving delivery vehicles with ultrasound. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60(10):1097-102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalecki D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004;6:229-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stride E, Coussios C. Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010;224(2):171-328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tachibana K, Tachibana S. The use of ultrasound for drug delivery. Echocardiography 2001;18(4):323-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M. Characteristics of SonoVue™. Echocardiography 1999;16:743-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabalnov A, Klein D, Pelura T, Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream. 1. Theory. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24(5):739-49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyongy M, Coussios CC. Passive spatial mapping of inertial cavitation during HIFU exposure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57(1):48-56
   Google Scholar
• Jensen CR, Ritchie RW, Gyöngy M, Spatiotemporal Monitoring of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy with Passive Acoustic Mapping. Radiology 2012;262(1):252-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CR, Bamber JC, Ter Haar G. Physical principles of medical ultrasonics. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:15
   Google Scholar
• Tho P, Manasseh R, Ooi A. Cavitation microstreaming patterns in single and multiple bubble systems. J Fluid Mech 2007;576:191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brujan E, Ikeda T, Matsumoto Y. Jet formation and shock wave emission during collapse of ultrasound-induced cavitation bubbles and their role in the therapeutic applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:4797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt WG, Husseini GA, Staples BJ. Ultrasonic drug delivery-a general review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2004;1(1):37-56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dayton P, Klibanov A, Brandenburger G, Ferrara K. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25(8):1195-201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JL, Roeder BL, Carmen JC, Ultrasonically activated chemotherapeutic drug delivery in a rat model. Cancer Res 2002;62(24):7280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov AL, Shevchenko TI, Raju BI, Ultrasound-triggered release of materials entrapped in microbubble-liposome constructs: a tool for targeted drug delivery. J Control Release 2010;148(1):13-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Gao Z, Kennedy A. Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99(14):1095-106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohet RV, Chen S, Zhou YT, Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. Circulation 2000;101(22):2554-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrie A, Brisken A, Francis S, Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery. Gene Ther 2000;7(23):2023-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason TJ. Therapeutic ultrasound an overview. Ultrason Sonochem 2011;18(4):847-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wamel A, Bouakaz A, Bernard B, Radionuclide tumour therapy with ultrasound contrast microbubbles. Ultrasonics 2004;42(1):903-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Dis 2005;4(3):255-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 2002;9(6):372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada Y, Ogawa K, Irie Y, Ultrasound activation of TiO 2 in melanoma tumors. J Control Release 2011;149(2):190-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazan-Peregrino M, Arvanitis CD, Rifai B, Ultrasound-induced cavitation enhances the delivery and therapeutic efficacy of an oncolytic virus in an in vitro model. J Control Rel 2012;157(2):235-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Pislaru SV, Greenleaf JF. Sonoporation: mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Somat Cell Mol Genet 2002;27(1):115-34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mo R, Lin S, Wang G, Preliminary in vitro study of ultrasound sonoporation cell labeling with superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for MRI cell tracking. In: 2008: IEEE; 2008. p. 367-70
   Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Bao S, Gies RA, Thrall BD. Ultrasonic enhancement of gene transfection in murine melanoma tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25(9):1425-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Dellian M, Fukumura D, Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. Cancer Res 1995;55(17):3752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs SK, Monsky WL, Yuan F, Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1998;95(8):4607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashizume H, Baluk P, Morikawa S, Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. Am J Pathol 2000;156(4):1363-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann JK, Cheng Z, Davis C, Targeted Microbubbles for Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis: assessment of Whole-Body Biodistribution with Dynamic Micro-PET in Mice1. Radiology 2008;249(1):212-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirsi S, Feshitan J, Kwan J, Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36(6):935-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport NY, Kennedy AM, Shea JE, Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J Control Release 2009;138(3):268-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour L. Passive tumor targeting of soluble macromolecules and drug conjugates. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 1992;9(2):135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• g Gabizon A, Catane R, Uziely B, Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Res 1994;54(4):987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malam Y, Loizidou M, Seifalian AM. Liposomes and nanoparticles: nanosized vehicles for drug delivery in cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009;30(11):592-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch S, Pohl P, Cobet U, Rainov NG. Ultrasound enhancement of liposome-mediated cell transfection is caused by cavitation effects. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26(5):897-903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evjen TJ, Nilssen EA, Rögnvaldsson S, Distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine-based liposomes for ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;75(3):327-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evjen TJ, Nilssen EA, Barnert S, Ultrasound-mediated destabilization and drug release from liposomes comprising dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine. Eur J Pharm Sci 2011;42(4):380-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SL. Liposomes in ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60(10):1167-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SL, Hamilton AJ, Pozharski E, Physical correlates of the ultrasonic reflectivity of lipid dispersions suitable as diagnostic contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28(3):339-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SL, MacDonald RC. Acoustically active liposomes for drug encapsulation and ultrasound-triggered release. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1665(1):134-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Magin RL, Cysyk RL, Zaharko DS. Treatment of solid L1210 murine tumors with local hyperthermia and temperature-sensitive liposomes containing methotrexate. Cancer Res 1980;40(5):1388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong G, Anyarambhatla G, Petros WP, Efficacy of liposomes and hyperthermia in a human tumor xenograft model: importance of triggered drug release. Cancer Res 2000;60(24):6950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel V, Etherington A, Greene M, Delivery of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in a breast cancer tumor model: investigation of potential enhancement by pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound exposure. Acad Radiol 2006;13(4):469-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negishi Y, Omata D, Iijima H, Enhanced laminin-derived peptide AG73-mediated liposomal gene transfer by bubble liposomes and ultrasound. Mol Pharm 2010;7(1):217-26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, Gene delivery by combination of novel liposomal bubbles with perfluoropropane and ultrasound. J Control Release 2007;117(1):130-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkan Onyuksel H, Demos SM, Lanza GM, Development of inherently echogenic liposomes as an ultrasonic contrast agent. J Pharm Sci 1996;85(5):486-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, Tumor specific ultrasound enhanced gene transfer in vivo with novel liposomal bubbles. J Control Release 2008;125(2):137-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirolomoom A, Dayton PA, Lum AFH, Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. J Control Release 2007;118(3):275-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larina IV, Evers BM, Ashitkov TV, Enhancement of drug delivery in tumors by using interaction of nanoparticles with ultrasound radiation. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4(2):217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaffe SJ, Arora M, Coussios CC, Schiffter HA. Sonosensitive nanoparticle formulations for cavitation-mediated ultrasonic enhancement of local drug delivery. Material Research Society Symposium Proceeding. 2011; p. 1316- DOI: 10.1557/opl.2011.323
   Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Kennedy AM, Christensen DA, Rapoport NY. Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy. Ultrasonics 2008;48(4):260-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li X, Zhou Y, Preparation of nanobubbles for ultrasound imaging and intracelluar drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2010;384(1-2):148-53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lattin J, Belnap D, Pitt W. Formation of eLiposomes as a drug delivery vehicle. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2012;89:93-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran PS, Luois S, Dayton PA, Matsunaga TO. Formulation and acoustic studies of a new phase-shift agent for diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound. Langmuir 2011;27(17):10412-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Huang X, Hu K, Treatment of transplanted adriamycin-resistant ovarian cancers in mice by combination of adriamycin and ultrasound exposure. Ultrason Sonochem 2004;11(5):287-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger EC, McCREERY TP, Sweitzer RH, Acoustically active lipospheres containing paclitaxel: a new therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent. Invest Radiol 1998;33(12):886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartis MS, McCallan J, Lum AFH, Therapeutic effects of paclitaxel-containing ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(11):1771-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CPL, Jackson JK, Pirmoradi FN, Increased accumulation and retention of micellar paclitaxel in drug-sensitive and p-glycoprotein–expressing cell lines following ultrasound exposure. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012;38(5):736-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana K, Uchida T, Tamura K, Enhanced cytotoxic effect of Ara-C by low intensity ultrasound to HL-60 cells. Cancer Lett 2000;149(1):189-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HL, Hua MY, Yang HW, Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain. Pro Nat Academy Sci 2010;107(34):15205-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderoff RI, Sheu MT, Sokoloski TD. Fibrin based drug delivery systems. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 1991;45(1):2-6
   Google Scholar
• Fabiilli ML, Lee JA, Kripfgans OD, The release of thrombin, using acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV), from perfluoropentane double emulsions. In: 2010: IEEE; 2010. p. 107-7
   Google Scholar
• Glover DJ, Lipps HJ, Jans DA. Towards safe, non-viral therapeutic gene expression in humans. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6(4):299-310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis CD, Bazan-Peregrino M, Rifai B, Cavitation-enhanced extravasation for drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37(11):1838-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehier-Humbert S, Yan F, Frinking P, Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: influence of contrast agent on transfection. Bioconjug Chem 2007;18(3):652-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita M, Hynynen K. A novel method for the intracellular delivery of siRNA using microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;335(2):393-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otani K, Yamahara K, Ohnishi S, Nonviral delivery of siRNA into mesenchymal stem cells by a combination of ultrasound and microbubbles. J Control Release 2009;133(2):146-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke RE, Lentacker I, Demeester J, Ultrasound assisted siRNA delivery using PEG-siPlex loaded microbubbles. J Control Release 2008;126(3):265-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo-Takahashi Y, Negishi Y, Kato Y, Efficient siRNA delivery using novel siRNA-loaded Bubble liposomes and ultrasound. Int J Pharm 2012;422(1-2):504-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Negishi Y, Endo Y, Fukuyama T, Delivery of siRNA into the cytoplasm by liposomal bubbles and ultrasound. J Control Release 2008;132(2):124-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoi A, Watanabe Y, Mori S, Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase-mediated suicide gene therapy using nano/microbubbles and ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34(3):425-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson AR, McTiernan CF, Lavery L, Gene therapy of carcinoma using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37(3):393-402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa R, Morii A, Watanabe A, Regulation of gene expression in human prostate cancer cells with artificially constructed promoters that are activated in response to ultrasound stimulation. Ultrason sonochem 2012; Epub ahead of print Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Elshami A, Amin K, Retinoids augment the bystander effect in vitro and in vivo in herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir-mediated gene therapy. Gene Ther 1997;4(9):909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RR, Huebner RJ, Rowe WP, Studies on the use of viruses in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 1956;9(6):1211-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard CM, Forsberg F, Minimo C, Ultrasound guided site specific gene delivery system using adenoviral vectors and commercial ultrasound contrast agents. J Cell Physiol 2006;209(2):413-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco A, Di Benedetto A, Howard CM, Eradication of therapy-resistant human prostate tumors using an ultrasound-guided site-specific cancer terminator virus delivery approach. Mol Ther 2009;18(2):295-306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannell H, Pircher J, Räthel T, Targeted endothelial gene delivery by ultrasonic destruction of magnetic microbubbles carrying lentiviral vectors. Pharm Res 2012;29(5):1282-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirn D. Oncolytic virotherapy for cancer with the adenovirus dl1520 (Onyx-015): results of phase I and II trials. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2001;1(3):525-38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release 2005;104(1):213-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(6):915-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Kumon RE, Cui J, Deng CX. The size of sonoporation pores on the cell membrane. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35(10):1756-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Greenleaf JF, Kinnick RR, Ultrasound-mediated transfection of mammalian cells. Hum Gene Ther 1996;7(11):1339-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieger SM, Caskey CF, Adamson RH, Enhancement of vascular permeability with low-frequency contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the chorioallantoic membrane model1. Radiology 2007;243(1):112-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmer M, Chlon C, Raju B, Focused ultrasound and microbubbles for enhanced extravasation. J Control Release 2010;148(1):18-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof G, Cornel E, Smits G, Influence of high-intensity focused ultrasound on the development of metastases. Eur Urol 1997;32(1):91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Wang ZB, Jin CB, Circulating tumor cells in patients with solid malignancy treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(4):511-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers R, Moonen CTW. Ultrasound triggered, image guided, local drug delivery. J Control Release 2010;148(1):25-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagami T, Ernsting MJ, Li SD. Efficient tumor regression by a single and low dose treatment with a novel and enhanced formulation of thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin. J Control Release 2011;152(2):303-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar