Mathematical models for dermal drug absorption

Bibliography

• European Parliament CotEU. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency. 2006
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Guidance document for the conduct of skin absorption studies. OECD Publishing; Paris: 2004
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Test No. 428: skin Absorption: In Vitro Method. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris; 2004
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Dermal Absorption (EHC 235). 2006
   Google Scholar
• Anissimov YG, Jepps OG, Dancik Y, et al. Mathematical and pharmacokinetic modelling of epidermal and dermal transport processes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65(2):169-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita F, Hashida M. Mechanistic and empirical modeling of skin permeation of drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003;55(9):1185-99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford University Press; London: 1975
   Google Scholar
• Frasch F, Barbero AM. Application of numerical methods for diffusion-based modeling of skin permeation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65(2):208-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarley KD, Bunge AL. Pharmacokinetic models of dermal absorption. J Pharm Sci 2001;90(11):1699-719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seta Y, Ghanem AH, Higuchi WI, et al. Physical model approach to understanding finite dose transport and uptake of hydrocortisone in hairless guinea-pig skin. Int J Pharm 1992;81(1):89-99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy RH, Hadgraft J. Transdermal drug delivery: A simplified pharmacokinetic approach. Int J Pharm 1985;24(2-3):267-74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace SM, Barnett G. Pharmacokinetic analysis of percutaneous absorption: evidence of parallel penetration pathways for methotrexate. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1978;6(4):315-25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen S, Lehr C-M, Schaefer UF. Improved input parameters for diffusion models of skin absorption. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65(2):251-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy R, Hadgraft J, Maibach H. A pharmacokinetic model for percutaneous absorption. Int J Pharm 1982;11(2):119-29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota K. A compartment model for percutaneous drug absorption. J Pharm Sci 1991;80(5):502-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies M, Pendlington RU, Page L, et al. Determining epidermal disposition kinetics for use in an integrated nonanimal approach to skin sensitization risk assessment. Toxicol Sci 2011;119(2):308-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak S, Ghobadi C, Mishra H, et al. Prediction of concentration–time profile and its inter-individual variability following the dermal drug absorption. J Pharm Sci 2012;101(7):2584-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarley K, Bunge A. Physiologically relevant two-compartment pharmacokinetic models for skin. J Pharm Sci 2000;89(9):1212-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy M, McCarley K, Bunge A. Physiologically relevant one-compartment pharmacokinetic models for skin. 2. Comparison of models when combined with a systemic pharmacokinetic model. J Pharm Sci 2000;87(4):482-90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knofczynski GT, Mundfrom D. Sample sizes when using multiple linear regression for prediction. Educ Psychol Meas 2008;68(3):431-42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrens R, Putter H, Buydens LMC. The bootstrap: a tutorial. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2000;54(1):35-52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 2003;22(1):69-77
   Google Scholar
• Potts RO, Guy RH. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm Res 1992;9(5):663-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn GL. Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption. In: Gerrity TR, Henry CJ, editors. Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment, Elsevier; New York: 1990. pp. 93-127
   Google Scholar
• Wilschut A, ten Berge WF, Robinson PJ, et al. Estimating skin permeation. The validation of five mathematical skin permeation models. Chemosphere 1995;30(7):1275-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel H, Berge WT, Cronin MTD. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals. Chemosphere 2002;48(6):603-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MS, Pugh WJ, Hadgraft J. Epidermal permeability: Penetrant structure relationships. Int J Pharm 1996;132(1-2):23-32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh WJ, Roberts MS, Hadgraft J. Epidermal permeability-penetrant structure relationships: 3. The effect of hydrogen bonding interactions and molecular size on diffusion across the stratum corneum. Int J Pharm 1996;138(2):149-65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh WJ, Degim IT, Hadgraft J. Epidermal permeability-penetrant structure relationships: 4, QSAR of permeant diffusion across human stratum corneum in terms of molecular weight, H-bonding and electronic charge. Int J Pharm 2000;197(1-2):203-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MB, Lau C-H, Lim ST, et al. An evaluation of the potential of linear and nonlinear skin permeation models for the prediction of experimentally measured percutaneous drug absorption. J Pharm Pharmacol 2012;64(4):566-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Değím T, Hadgraft J, Ilbasmiş S, et al. Prediction of skin penetration using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling. J Pharm Sci 2003;92(3):656-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi MH, Malekzadeh H. In silico prediction of dermal penetration rate of chemicals from their molecular structural descriptors. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2012;34(2):297-306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim CW, Fujiwara S-I, Yamashita F, et al. Prediction of Human Skin Permeability Using a Combination of Molecular Orbital Calculations and Artificial Neural Network. Biol Pharm Bull 2002;25(3):361-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely BJ, Madihally SV, Robinson RL, et al. Nonlinear quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin permeation coefficient. J Pharm Sci 2009;98(11):4069-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann D, Kohlbacher O, Merkwirth C, et al. A Fully Computational Model for Predicting Percutaneous Drug Absorption. J Chem Inf Model 2006;46(1):424-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafourian T, Zandasrar P, Hamishekar H, et al. The effect of penetration enhancers on drug delivery through skin: a QSAR study. J Controlled Release 2004;99(1):113-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng T, Hopfinger AJ, Esposito EX, et al. Membrane-Interaction Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship (MI-QSAR) Analyses of Skin Penetration Enhancers. J Chem Inf Model 2008;48(6):1238-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafourian T, Samaras EG, Brooks JD, et al. Validated models for predicting skin penetration from different vehicles. Eur J Pharm Sci 2010;41(5):612-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadzovska D, Brooks JD, Monteiro-Riviere NA, et al. Predicting skin permeability from complex vehicles. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2013;65(2):265-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson BM, Anissimov YG, Cross SE, et al. Molecular size as the main determinant of solute maximum flux across the skin. J Invest Dermatol 2004;122(4):993-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Grice JE, Li P, et al. Skin solubility determines maximum transepidermal flux for similar size molecules. Pharm Res 2009;26(8):1974-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski M, Stinchcomb AL. Estimation of maximum transdermal flux of nonionized xenobiotics from basic physicochemical determinants. Mol Pharm 2012;9(7):2111-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frasch HF, Barbero AM, Hettick JM, et al. Tissue binding affects the kinetics of theophylline diffusion through the stratum corneum barrier layer of skin. J Pharm Sci 2011;100(7):2989-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy RH, Hadgraft J, Bucks DAW. Transdermal drug delivery and cutaneous metabolism. Xenobiotica 1987;17(3):325-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy MB, Guy RH, Bunge AL. Does epidermal turnover reduce percutaneous penetration? Pharm Res 2000;17(11):1414-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancik Y, Anissimov YG, Jepps OG. Convective transport of highly plasma protein bound drugs facilitates direct penetration into deep tissues after topical application. Brit J Clin Pharmaco 2012;73(4):564-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anissimov YG, Roberts MS. Diffusion modeling of percutaneous absorption kinetics: 3. Variable Diffusion and partition coefficients, consequences for stratum corneum depth profiles and desorption kinetics. J Pharm Sci 2004;93(2):470-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein A. Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen der Physik 1905;322(8):549-60
   Google Scholar
• Anderson BD, Raykar PV. Solute structure-permeability relationships in human stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 1989;93(2):280-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson BD, Higuchi WI, Raykar PV. Heterogeneity effects on permeability-partition coefficient relationships in human stratum corneum. Pharm Res 1988;5(9):566-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beezer AE, Gooch CA, Hunter WH, et al. A thermodynamic analysis of the Collander equation and establishment of a reference solvent for use in drug partitioning studies. J Pharm Pharmacol 1987;39(10):774-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuplein RJ. Mechanism of percutaneous absorption. II. Transient diffusion and the relative importance of various routes of skin penetration. J Invest Dermatol 1967;48(1):79-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels AS, Chandrasekaran SK, Shaw JE. Drug permeation through human skin: Theory and in vitro experimental measurement. AIChE J 1975;21(5):985-96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan KB, Wasdo SC, Rautio J. Design for optimized topical delivery: Prodrugs and a paradigm change. Pharm Res 2006;23(12):2729-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Li P, Roberts MS. Maximum transepidermal flux for similar size phenolic compounds is enhanced by solvent uptake into the skin. J Control Release 2011;154(1):50-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiserova-Bergerova V, Pierce JT, Droz PO. Dermal absorption potential of industrial chemicals: Criteria for skin notation. Am J Ind Med 1990;17(5):617-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone TE, Howd RA. Estimating dermal uptake of nonionic organic chemicals from water and soil: I. Unified fugacity-based models for risk assessments. Risk Anal 1992;12(4):543-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winckle G, Anissimov YG, Cross SE, et al. An integrated pharmacokinetic and imaging evaluation of vehicle effects on solute human epidermal flux and, retention characteristics. Pharm Res 2008;25(1):158-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer-Korting M, Bock U, Diembeck W, et al. The use of reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: Results of the validation study. ATLA-Altern Lab Anim 2008;36(2):161-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Guidance document on the validation of (Q)SAR models. OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications; Paris: 2007
   Google Scholar
• Barbero AM, Frasch F. Pig and guinea pig skin as surrogates for human in vitro penetration studies: A quantitative review. Toxicol In Vitro 2009;23(1):1-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anissimov YG, Roberts MS. Diffusion modeling of percutaneous absorption kinetics. 1. Effects of flow rate, receptor sampling rate, and viable epidermal resistance for a constant donor concentration. J Pharm Sci 1999;88(11):1201-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buist HE, van Burgsteden JA, Freidig AP, et al. New in vitro dermal absorption database and the prediction of dermal absorption under finite conditions for risk assessment purposes. Regul Toxicol Pharm 2010;57(2-3):200-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Sales O, Copovicí A, Casabó VG, et al. A modelistic approach showing the importance of the stagnant aqueous layers in in vitro diffusion studies, and in vitro-in vivo correlations. Int J Pharm 1991;77(1):1-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota K, Koyama E, Twizell EH. Dual sorption model for the nonlinear percutaneous kinetics of timolol. J Pharm Sci 1993;82(12):1205-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning A, Schaefer UF, Neumann D. Potential pitfalls in skin permeation experiments: Influence of experimental factors and subsequent data evaluation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;72(2):324-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC. Conduction of heat in solids. Clarendon Press; Oxford: 1959
   Google Scholar
• Cooper ER, Berner B. Finite dose pharmacokinetics of skin penetration. J Pharm Sci 1985;74(10):1100-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasting GB. Kinetics of finite dose absorption through skin 1. Vanillylnonanamide. J Pharm Sci 2001;90(2):202-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent RP. Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs: 1973
   Google Scholar
• Scheuplein RJ, Ross LW. Mechanism of percutaneous absorption. V. Percutaneous absorption of solvent deposited solids. J Invest Dermatol 1974;62(4):353-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sandt JJM, van Burgsteden JA, Cage S, et al. In vitro predictions of skin absorption of caffeine, testosterone, and benzoic acid: a multi-centre comparison study. Regul Toxicol Pharm 2004;39(3):271-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson SC, Maas WJM, Nielsen JB, et al. Interactions of skin thickness and physicochemical properties of test compounds in percutaneous penetration studies. Int Arch Occ Env Hea 2006;79(5):405-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Selzer D, Neumann D, et al. Influence of the application area on finite dose permeation in relation to drug type applied. Exp Dermatol 2012;21(3):233-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selzer D, Hahn T, Naegel A, et al. Finite dose skin mass balance including the lateral part: Comparison between experiment, pharmacokinetic modeling and diffusion models. J Control Release 2013;165(2):119-28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasting GB, Miller MA. Kinetics of finite dose absorption through skin 2: Volatile compounds. J Pharm Sci 2006;95(2):268-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frasch HF, Barbero AM. The transient dermal exposure: Theory and experimental examples using skin and silicone membranes. J Pharm Sci 2008;97(4):1578-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frasch HF, Bunge AL, The Transient Dermal Exposure II. Post-Exposure Absorption and Evaporation of Volatile Compounds. J Pharm Sci 2015;104(4):1499-507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy RH, Hadgraft J. Percutaneous metabolism with saturable enzyme kinetics. Int J Pharm 1982;11(3):187-97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadgraft J. The epidermal reservoir; A theoretical approach. Int J Pharm 1979;2(5-6):265-74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadgraft J. Theoretical aspects of metabolism in the epidermis. Int J Pharm 1980;4(3):229-39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anissimov YG, Roberts MS. Diffusion modeling of percutaneous absorption kinetics: 2. Finite vehicle volume and solvent deposited solids. J Pharm Sci 2001;90(4):504-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anissimov YG, Roberts MS. Diffusion modelling of percutaneous absorption kinetics: 4. Effects of a slow equilibration process within stratum corneum on absorption and desorption kinetics. J Pharm Sci 2009;98(2):772-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon L, Goyal A. Dynamics and control of percutaneous drug absorption in the presence of epidermal turnover. J Pharm Sci 2009;98(1):187-204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anissimov YG, Watkinson A. Modelling Skin Penetration Using the Laplace Transform Technique. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2013;26(4-6):286-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melero A, Hahn T, Schaefer UF, et al. In vitro human skin segmentation and drug concentration-skin depth profiles. Turksen K, edition Permeability barrier. 2 edition. Humana Press; New York: 2011. 33-50
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcomb AL, Pirot F, Touraille GD, et al. Chemical uptake into human stratum corneum in vivo from volatile and non-volatile solvents. Pharm Res 1999;16(8):1288-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Kostka KH, Lehr CM, et al. Human skin penetration of flufenamic acid: in vivo/in vitro correlation (deeper skin layers) for skin samples from the same subject. J Investig Dermatol 2002;118(3):540-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löffler H, Dreher F, Maibach HI. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal. Br J Dermatol 2004;151(4):746-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lademann J, Jacobi U, Surber C, et al. The tape stripping procedure – evaluation of some critical parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;72(2):317-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Chavez JJ, Merino-Sanjuan V, Lopez-Cervantes M, et al. The Tape-Stripping Technique as a Method for Drug Quantification in Skin. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2008;11(1):104-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lademann J, Jacobi U, Surber C, et al. The tape stripping procedure - evaluation of some critical parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;72(2):317-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegel A, Hansen S, Neumann D, et al. In-silico model of skin penetration based on experimentally determined input parameters. Part II: Mathematical modelling of in-vitro diffusion experiments. Identification of critical input parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;68(2):368-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegel A, Hahn T, Schaefer U, et al. Finite dose skin penetration: a comparison of concentration-depth profiles from experiment and simulation. Comput Visual Sci 2011;14(7):327-39
   Google Scholar
• Herkenne C, Naik A, Kalia YN, et al. Ibuprofen transport into and through skin from topical formulations: In vitro-in vivo comparison. J Invest Dermatol 2006;127(1):135-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah VP, Flynn GL, Yacobi A, et al. AAPS/FDA Workshop Report: Bioequivalence of topical dermatological dosage forms: Methods of evaluation of bioequivalence. Advanstar Communications; Duluth, MN, ETATS-UNIS: 1998
   Google Scholar
• Wearley LL, Tojo K, Chien YW. A numerical approach to study the effect of binding on the iontophoretic transport of a series of amino acids. J Pharm Sci 1990;79(11):992-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurnik RT, Potts RO. Modeling of diffusion and crystal dissolution in controlled release systems. J Control Release 1997;45(3):257-64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota K, Dey F, Matar SA, et al. A repeated-dose model of percutaneous drug absorption. Appl Math Model 2002;26(4):529-44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George K. A two-dimensional mathematical model of non-linear dual-sorption of percutaneous drug absorption. Biomed Eng Online 2005;4:40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen S, Naegel A, Heisig M, et al. The role of corneocytes in skin transport revised - a combined computational and experimental approach. Pharm Res 2009;26:1379-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muha I, Naegel A, Stichel S, et al. Effective diffusivity in membranes with tetrakaidekahedral cells and implications for the permeability of human stratum corneum. J Membrane Sci 2010;368(1-2):18-25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fort ECD, Frankel SP. Stability Conditions in the Numerical Treatment of Parabolic Differential Equations. Math Tables Other Aids Comput 1953;7(43):135-52
   Google Scholar
• Crank J, Nicolson P. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Mathematical Proc Cambridge Philosophical Soc 1947;43:50-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J. Jr. The solution of the heat equation by a high order correct difference equation. J Math Phys 1956;35:145-51
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche JM, Frasch HF. Dynamics of diffusion with reversible binding in microscopically heterogeneous membranes: General theory and applications to dermal penetration. Chem Eng Sci 2011;66(10):2019-41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbero AM, Frasch HF. Modeling of diffusion with partitioning in stratum corneum using a finite element model. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33(9):1281-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisig M, Lieckfeldt R, Wittum G, et al. Non steady-state descriptions of drug permeation through stratum corneum. I. The biphasic brick-and-mortar model. Pharm Res 1996;13(3):421-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner J, Deen W, Blankschtein D, et al. First-principles, structure-based transdermal transport model to evaluate lipid partition and diffusion coefficients of hydrophobic permeants solely from stratum corneum permeation experiments. J Pharm Sci 2007;96(12):3236-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T-F, Kasting GB, Nitsche JM. A multiphase microscopic diffusion model for stratum corneum permeability. I. formulation, solution, and illustrative results for representative compounds. J Pharm Sci 2006;95(3):620-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegel A, Heisig M, Wittum G. Detailed modeling of skin penetration - An overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65(2):191-207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Hughes-Oliver JM, Brooks JD, et al. Selection of appropriate training and validation set chemicals for modelling dermal permeability by U-optimal design. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2013;24(2):135-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittenden JT, Brooks JD, Riviere JE. Development of a mixed-effect pharmacokinetic model for vehicle modulated in vitro transdermal flux of topically applied penetrants. J Pharm Sci 2014;103(3):1002-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen L, Windbergs M. Applications of Raman spectroscopy in skin research — From skin physiology and diagnosis up to risk assessment and dermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel F, Zurich E. Is statistics too difficult? Can J Statistics 1998;26(3):497-513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves VM, Muratov E, Fourches D, et al. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part II: QSAR models of skin permeability and the relationships between skin permeability and skin sensitization. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2015;284(2):273-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahigara F, Mansouri K, Ballabio D, et al. Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models. Molecules 2012;17(5):4791-810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Information. CDC - Skin - Finite Dose Skin Permeation Calculator - NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/skin/finiteSkinPermCalc.html [Last accessed 3 June 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Karande P, Mitragotri S. Dependence of skin permeability on contact area. Pharm Res 2003;20(2):257-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira G, Hadgraft J, Lane ME. The influence of volatile solvents on transport across model membranes and human skin. Int J Pharm 2012;435(1):38-49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajjar RM, Kasting GB. Absorption of ethanol, acetone, benzene and 1,2-dichloroethane through human skin in vitro: a test of diffusion model predictions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014;281(1):109-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientific Consilience GmbH. DSkin 1.3. Available from: http://www.scientific-consilience.com/?q=dskin [Last accessed 3 June 2015]
   Google Scholar