The Bionas technology for anticancer drug screening

Bibliography

• Giesek K, Kaufman J, Pronk GJ, Klippel A. Unravelling novel intracellular pathways in cell-based assays. Drug Discov Today 2002;7:179-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmilä LA, Hurskainen P. Novel detection strategies for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2002;7(Suppl):S150-6
   Google Scholar
• Park TH, Shuler ML. Integration of cell culture and microfabrication technology. Biotechnol Prog 2003;19:245-53
   Google Scholar
• Hug TS. Biophysical methods for monitoring cell-substrate interactions in drug screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2003;1:479-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Molecular biology of the Cell. 2002. Garland Science Books, Taylor & Francis, London
   Google Scholar
• Wilmann M, Gautel M, Mayans O. Activation of calcium/calmodulin regulated kinases. Cell Mol Biol 2000;46:883-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestres-Ventura P. Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using Si-sensor-chips. Recent Results Cancer Res 2003;161:26-38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newell K, Franchi A, Pouysségur J, Tannock I. Studies with glycolysis-deficient cells suggest that production of lactic acid is not the only cause of tumor acidity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:1127-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frezza C, Gottlieb E. Mitochondria in cancer: not just innocent bystanders. Semin Cancer Biol 2009;19:4-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu PP, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: warburg and beyond. Cell 2008;134:703-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo LM, Keese CR, Giaever I. pH changes in pulse CO2 incubators causes periodic changes in cell morphology. Exp Cell Res 1994;213:391-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy WT. Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays. Drugs 1992;44:690-708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke D, O'Kennedy R. Comparison of the tetrazolium salt assay for succinate dehydrogenase with the Cytosensor microphysiometer in the assessment of compound toxicities. Anal Biochem 1999;274:188-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K'Owino IO, Sadik OA. Impedance spectroscopy: a powerful tool for rapid biomolecular screening and cell culture monitoring. Electroanalysis 2005;17:2101-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöning MJ, Poghossian A. Bio FEDs (field-effect devices): state-of-the-art and new directions. Electroanalysis 2006;18:1893-900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y. Label-free optical biosensors in drug discovery. Trends Biopharm Industry 2007;3:34-8
   Google Scholar
• Cooper MA. Label-free biosensors. Techniques and applications. University of Cambridge 2009
   Google Scholar
• Giaever I, Keese CR. Micromotion of mammalian cells measured electrically. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:7896-900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener J, Keese CR, Giaever I. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces. Exp Cell Res 2000;259:158-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: http.//www.biophysics.com
   Google Scholar
• Luong JHT, Habibi-Rezaei M, Meghrous J, et al. Monitoring motility, spreading and mortality of adherent insect cells using an impedance sensor. Anal Chem 2001;73:1844-8
   Google Scholar
• Keese CR, Bhawe K, Wegener J, Giaever I. Real-time impedance assay to follow the invasive activities of metastatic cells in culture. Biotechniques 2002;33:842-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owicki JC, Parce JW. Biosensors based on the energy metabolism of living cells: the chemistry and cell biology of extracellular acidification. Biosens Bioelectronics 1992;7:255-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Connell HM, Owicki JC, Parc WP, et al. The Cytosensor microphysiometer: biological applications of silicon technology. Science 1992;257:1906-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner F. Cytosensor microphysiometry: technology and recent applications. Biosens Bioelectron 2000;15:149-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund S, Nygren P, Larsson R. Microphysiometry: new technology for evaluation of anticancer drug activity in human tumor cells in vitro. Anti Cancer Drugs 1998;9:531-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf B, Brischwein M, Baumann W, et al. Monitoring of cellular signaling and metabolism with modular sensor-technique. The physiocontrol-microsystem. Biosens Bioelectron 1997;13:501-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann W, Lehmann M, Bitzenhofer M, et al. Microelectronic sensor system for microphysiological application on living cells. Sensors Actuators B 1998;B55:77-89
   Google Scholar
• Henning T, Brischwein M, Baumann W, et al. Approach to a multiparametric sensor–chip-based tumor chemosensitivity assay. Anticancer Drugs 2001;12:21-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: www.bionas.de
   Google Scholar
• Mestres-Ventura P, Morguet A, Schofer A, et al. Application of silicon sensor technologies to tumor tissue in vitro: Detection of metabolic correlates of chemosensitivity. Method Mol Med 2005;111:109-25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mestres P, Morguet A, Schmidt W, et al. A new method to assess drug sensitivity on breast tumor acute slices preparation. Ann NY Acad Sci 2006;1091:460-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchford S. Ligand characterization using microphysiometry. Curr Protocols Neurosci 1998;Suppl. 2. Unit 7.8:1-17
   Google Scholar
• Bioanalytical Workshop “Online monitoring of cellular metabolism using cell biosensor chips”. Institute for pharmacy and molecular biotechnology. University of Heidelberg 2009
   Google Scholar
• Cohen GN. The regulation of ell metabolism. 1968 Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY
   Google Scholar
• Smith E, Morowitz J. Universality in intermediary metabolism. Proc natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:13168-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille K, Paige LA, Higgins AJ. Application of the Cytosensor™ microphysiometer to drug discovery. Receptors Channels 2003;9:125-31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann M, Baumann W, Brischwein M, et al. Simultaneous measurement of cellular respiration and acidification with a single CMOS ISFET. Biosens Bioelectron 2001;16:195-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret R, Baumann W, Brischwein M, et al. Monitoring cellular behavior by impedance measurements on interdigited electrode structures. Biosens Bioelectron 1997;12:29-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morguet A, Pütz N, García Gómez de las Heras S, Mestres P. Correlation between cell substrate impedance and attachment and spreading of cells growing on artificial surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy studies. Microsc Microanal 2007;13(Suppl 3):246-7
   Google Scholar
• Morguet A, Roemer K, Mestres P. The impact of p53 status on cellular sensitivity to 5 fluorouracil: a multi-parametric biosensor study. Proc. Apoptosis World Conference, Org. Marc Diederich, Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire du Cancer, Luxemburg January 2008. p. 388
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Cai Y, Zuo X, et al. Suprachiasmatic nucleus slices induce molecular oscilations in fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;377:1179-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkoum D, Imhof A, Vallet PG, et al. Clusterin increases post-ischemic damages in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. J Neurochem 2008;106:1791-803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thedinga E, Kob A, Holst H, et al. Online monitoring of cell metabolism for studying pharmacodynamic effects. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007;220:33-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy A, O'Kennedy R. Studies on coumarins and coumarin-related compounds to determine their therapeutic role in the treatment of cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2004;10:3797-811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Yu J, Xiao L, et al. Impedance studies of bio-behavior and chemosensitivity of cancer cells by micro-electrode arrays. Biosens Bioelectron 2009;24:1305-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Luong JH. Assessment of cytotoxicity by emerging impedance spectroscopy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005;206:102-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thedinga E, Ulrich A, Drechsler S, et al. In vitro system for the prediction of hepatotoxic effects in primary hepatocyts. ALTEX 2007;24:222-34
   Google Scholar
• Ceriotti L, Kob A, Drechsler S, et al. Online monitoring of BALB3T3 metabolism and adhesion with multiparametric chip-based system. Anal Biochem 2007;371:92-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlos M, Ott I, Gust R, et al. Synthesis, biological activity, and structure-activity relationships for potent cytotoxic rhodium(III) polypyridyl complexes. J Med Chem 2008;51:3924-33
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Gomez de las Heras S, Morguet A, Puetz N, et al. Ultrastructure of choroid plexus epithelial monolayers cultured on silicon sensor-chips for microphysiometry studies. Microsc Microanal 2007;13(S03):240-1
   Google Scholar
• Mahyar-Romer M, Fritzsche C, Wagner S, et al. Mitochondrial p 53 levels parallel total p53 levels independent of stress response in human colorectal carcinoma and glioblastoma cells. Oncogene 2004;23:6226-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyne K, Schmitt K, Mueller D, et al. Resistance of mitochondrial p53 to dominant inhibition. Mol Cancer 2008;7:1-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis PM, Svendsrud DH, Kravik KL, Stokke T. Cellular response to 5fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU resistant colon cancer celllines during treatment and recovery. Mol Cancer 2006;5:20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma W, Sung HJ, Park JY, et al. A pivotal role for p53: balancing aerobic respiration and glycolysis. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2007;39:243-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovinsky E, Donehower RC. Placlitaxel. N Eng J Med 1995;332:1004-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhold-Heerlein I, Borges-Engeby K, Grünn U, et al. TRAIL-Induced apoptosis of ovarian cancer cell lines with selective drug resistance. Geburtsh Frauenheil 2005;65:1064-73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villela LR, Stanford BL, Shah SR. Pemetrexed, a novel antifolate therapeutic alternative for cancer chemotherapy. Pharmacotherapy 2006;26:641-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morguet A, Mestres P. The effects of Enzastaurin and Alimta® on cancer cell lines and tumor tissue using a new silicon-sensor-chip technology. Proc. Chariré-Mayo-Conference, Berlin, 5 – 8 September 2007
   Google Scholar
• Schatzschneider U, Niesel J, Ott I, et al. Cellular uptake, cytotoxixity, and metabolic profiling of human cancer cells treated with ruthenium (II) polypyridyl complexes [Ru(bpy)]2(N-N)] Cl2 with N-N=bpy, phen, dpq, dppz and dppn. ChemMedChem 2008;3:1104-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morguet A, Laue M, Freund I, et al. Applications of silicon-sensor-chip apparatus to determine cell and tumour chemosensitivity ex vivo. Annual meeting of the German society of anatomy and cell biology, Freiburg April 2006
   Google Scholar
• Paull KD, Haamel E, Malspeis L. Prediction of biochemical mechanisms of action from the in vitro antitumor screen of the National Cancer Institute. In: Foye WE, editor, Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents, Washington, DC, American Chemical Society. 1995. p. 9-45
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez M, Robey R, Sandor V, et al. Using the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen to assess the effect of MRP expression on drug sensitivity profiles using the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen to assess the effect of MRP expression on drug sensitivity profiles. Mol Pharm 1998;54:802-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suggit M, Bibby MC. 50 years of preclinical anticancer drug screening: empirical to target-driven approaches. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:971-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang WG, Martin TA, Lewis-Russell JM, et al. Eplin-alpha expression in human breast cancer, the impact on cellular migration and clinical outcome. Mol Cancer 2008;7:71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters MF, Knappenberger KS, Wilkins D, et al. Evaluation of cellular dielectric spectroscopy, a whole-cell, label-free technology or drug discovery on Gi-coupled GPCRs. J Biomol Screen 2007;12:312-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu N, Atienza JM, Bernard J, et al. Real-time monitoring of morphological changes in living cells by electronic cell sensor arrays: an approach to study G protein-coupled receptors. Anal Chem 2006;78:35-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd JM, Huang L, Xie L, et al. A cell-microelectronic sensing technique for profiling cytotoxicity of chemicals. Anal Chim Acta 2008;615:80-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Li G, Ferrie A. Non-invasive optical biosensor for assaying endogeneous G protein-coupled receptors in adherent cells. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2007;55:314-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee PH, Gao A, van Staden C, et al. Evaluation of dynamic mass redistribution technology for pharmacological studies of recombinant and endogenously expressed G protein-coupled receptors. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2008;6:83-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan V, Guichard J, Li CY, et al. O(2)-sensing signal cascade: clamping of O(2) respiration, reduced ATP utilization, and inducible fumarate respiration. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008;295:C29-37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrick DA, Neilson A, Beeson C. Advances in measuring cellular bioenergetics using extracellular flux. Drug Discov Today 2008;13:268-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiest J, Stadhagen T, Schmidhuber M, et al. Intelligent mobile lab for metablics in environmental monitoring. Anal Lett 2006;39:1759-71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund SE, Thompson RG, Snider RM, et al. Metabolic discrimination of selected list agents by monitoring cellular responses in a multianalyte microphysiometer. Sensors 2009;9:2117-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adlam DJ, Dabbous MK, Woolley DE. Electrochmeical Monityoring of rat mammary adenocarcinoma cells: an in vitro assay for anticancer drug selection. ASSAY Drug Dev Technol 2008;6:795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar