Radiologic screening for lung cancer

References

• Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer 1 Clin. 48(1), 6–29 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Shopland DR, Eyre HJ, Pechacek TE
   Google Scholar
• ••Smoking-attributable cancer mortality in 1991: is lung cancer now the leading cause of death among smokers in the United States?' Natl Cancer Inst. 21,83(16), 1142–1148 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Risch HA, Howe GR, Jain M, Burch JD, Holowaty EJ, Miller AB. Are female smokers at higher risk for lung cancer than male smokers? A case-control analysis by histologic type. Am. J. Epidemial 1,138(5), 281–293 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Fraumeni JF, Blot WJ. Lung and pleura. In: Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 564–582 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Mountain CE Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest111(6), 1710–1717 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures: 1998. ACS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1–36 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Carter SK. Chemotherapy of lung cancer. Semin. Oncol 9(4 Suppl. 1), 40–55 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Diederich S, Wormanns D, Heindel W Low-dose CT new tool for screening lung cancer? Eur. Radial 11(10), 1916–1924 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Jenicek M, Feinstein AR. In: Epidemiology. The Logic of Modern Medicine. Epimed, Montreal, QB, Canada, 108–110 (1995). toWilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and
   Google Scholar
• •practice of mass screening for disease. Bal. Oficina Sanit. Panam. 65(4), 281–393 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Eddy DM, How to think about screening. In: Common Screening-Tests. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1–21 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen OS. Screening for lung cancer: can it be cost-effective? Can. Med. Assoc. J. 162,1431–1436 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedenberg RM. The 21st century: the age of screening. Radiology 223(1), 1–4 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mulshine JL, Tockman MS, Smart CR. Considerations in the development of lungcancer screening tools. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 21,81(12), 900–906 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Patz EF Jr, Black WC, Goodman PC. CT screening for lung cancer: not ready for routine practice. Radiology221 (3), 587–591 discussion 598–599 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Stellman SD, Muscat JE, Hoffmann D, Wynder EL. Impact of filter cigarette smoking on lung cancer histology. Prey Med. 26(4), 451–456 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Patz EF Jr, Goodman PC, Bepler G. Screening for lung cancer. N EngIf Med. 30,343(22), 1627–1633 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Austin JH, Stellman SD, Pearson GD. Screening for lung cancer. N EngIf Med. 22,344(12), discussion 935–936 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Diederich S, Wormanns D, Lenzen H et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography of the chest: results of baseline examinations in 919 asymptomatic smokers. Eur. Radio110, S253 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology222(3), 773–781 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sobue T, Masaki M, Misawa J, Suzuki A. CT-detected Stage I lung cancer: how curable is it and is there 'over-diagnosis.' Proceedings of the First International Conference on Screening for Lung Cancer. October 1–3 New York, NY, USA, (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Eng,' J Med. 22, 342(25), 1878–1886 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Wilde J. A 10 year follow-up of semiannual screening for early detection of lung cancer in the Erfurt County, GDR. Eur Respir. 2(7), 656–662 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR, Zaman MB, Heelan RT, Perchick WB, Martini N. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study. Am. Rev Respir. Dis. 130(4), 555–560 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Frost JK, Ball WC Jr, Levin ML et al Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 130(4), 549–554 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Taylor WF et al Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study. Am. Rev TAPir Dis 130(4), 561–565 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubik A, Polak J. Lung cancer detection. Results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia. Cancer 15,57(12), 2427–2437 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Fontana RS, Sanderson DR et al. Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the MayoLung Project. Cancer15 67(4 Suppl.), 1155–1164 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Fontana TRS, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB et al The Mayo Lung Project for early detection and localization of bronchogenic carcinoma: a status report. Chest 67(5), 511–522 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berlin NI, Buncher CR, Fontana RS, Frost JK, Melamed MR. The National Cancer Institute Co-operative Early Lung Cancer Detection Program. Results of the initial screen (prevalence). Early lung cancer detection: introduction. Am. Rev Respir. Dis. 130(4), 545–549 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Strauss GM, Dominioni L. Lung cancer screening and the surgical oncologist: the controversy. Surg. Oncol Clin. N Am. 8(2), 371–387 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Munden RF, Pugatch RD, Liptay MJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Le LU. Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. Radiology202(1), 105–110 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI. Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology 175 (3), 729–731 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich S, Lenzen H, Windmann R et al. Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT Radiology 213(1), 289–298 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al.
   Google Scholar
• •Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Racliology201 (3), 798–802 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz
   Google Scholar
• ••DF et al Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet10,354(9173), 99–105 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM et
   Google Scholar
• •al Early lung cancer action project: annual screening using single-slice helical CT Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 952,124-134 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Swenson SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computer tomography. Am. j Respir. Grit. Care Med. 165,508–513 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hillman BJ, Gatsonis C, Sullivan DC. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: new national co-operative group for conducting clinical trials of medical imaging technologies. Radiology 213 (3), 641–645 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al. Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings. Radiology212(1), 61–66 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patz EF Jr, Rossi S, Harpole DH Jr, Herndon JE, Goodman PC. Correlation of tumor size and survival in patients with Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 117(6), 1568–1571 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson SJ, Herndon J, D'Amico AV et al Results of CALGB 39802: feasibility of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early stage cancer. Proc. Am. Assoc. Clin. Oncol. 21,290a (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF et al. Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings. Cancer 1, 92(1), 153–159 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Passlick B, Izbicki JR, Kubuschok B et al Immunohistochemical assessment of individual tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Oncol 12(9), 1827–1832 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217(1), 251–256 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller DL, Rowland CM, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC. Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer 1 cm or less in diameter. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73,1545-1551 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP, Miettinen OS. Screening for lung cancer: the early lung cancer action approach. Lung Cancer35(2), 143–148 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Klaveren RJ, Habbema JDF, Pedersen JH, de Koning HJ, Oudkerk M, Hoogsteden HC. Lung cancer screening by low-dose spiral computed tomography. Eur Respir. 18(5), 857–866 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coakley FV, Cohen MD, Johnson MS, Hanna MP, Gonin R. Use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection in the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules. Radiology201, S162 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kanazawa K, Kawata Y, Niki N et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for pulmonary nodules based on helical CT images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 22 (2), 157–167 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Mulshine JL, Henschke CI. Prospects for lung-cancer screening. Lancet 19,355(9204), 592–593 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mulshine JL, Cuttitta F, Tockman MS, De Luca LM. Lung cancer evolution to preinvasive management. Gun. Chest Med. 23(1), 37–48 (2002).
   Google Scholar