Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state

References

• Myers RP. Radical prostatectomy: making it a better operation in the new millennium. Int. J. Urol.8(7), S9–S14 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.175, 315–321 (1905).
   Google Scholar
• Reiner WG, Walsh PC. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal venous complex during radical retropubic surgery. J. Urol.212, 198–200 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology. J. Urol.128, 492–497 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PC, Lepor H. The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic carcinoma. Cancer60(Suppl. 3), 526–537 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler FJ Jr, Barry MJ, Lu-Yao G, Roman A, Wasson J, Wennberg JE. Patient-reported complications and follow up treatment following radical prostatectomy, The National Medicare Experience (1988–1990). Urology42, 622–629 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hakim A, Leung RA, Tewari A. Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.6(1), 11–20 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short term experience. Urology50, 854–857 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabulsi E, Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.173, 1072–1079 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler SL, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt H. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J. Urol.166, 2101–2108 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieder JA, Soloway MS. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol.160, 299–315 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, Walsh PC. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J. Urol.171(1), 23–26 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Br. J. Urol. Int.87, 408–410 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the vattikuti urology institute experience. Urology60(5), 864–868 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur. Urol.51(1), 45–56 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur. Urol.51(3), 755–763 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the ‘veil of Aphrodite’ technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur. Urol.49(6), 1065–1074 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Tewari A. Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points. Urology61(Suppl. 4A), 15–20 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.170(5), 1738–1741 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J et al. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur. Urol.44(2), 175–181 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Engl T et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J. Urol.21(3), 128–132 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur. Urol.57, 648–658 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting – the learning curve and beyond. Initial 200 cases. J. Urol.174(1), 269–272 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer KJ, Shah K, Thaly R, Patel V. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 consecutive cases. Urology (Suppl. 3A), 136 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology63(5), 819–822 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. conventional and robotics. Urology66, 101–104 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology67(2), 360–363 (2005)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalona W, Han M, Kundu S et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J. Urol.172, 2227–2231 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy. Experience in one institution. Br. J. Urol. Int.92(3), 205–210 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol.177(3), 929–931 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy. a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J. Urol.174, 912–914 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson S, Nilsson A, Wiklund P. Postoperative urinary continence after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Scand. J. Urol. Neph.40, 103–107 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence, and complication rate in 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J. Urol.162, 433–438 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA et al. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology66(2), 419–423 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky D et al. Rapid communication: early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol.19(6), 715–718 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah KK, Thaly R, Patel V. Early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during robotic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.177(4), 117 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mikhail A, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology68(6), 1275–1279 (2006)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Vicente I, Madeb R et al. Robot-assisted vs our laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? Br.J. Urol. Int.96, 39–42 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan JK, Cheng CW. Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J. Surg.27321–325 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Euro. Urol.51(1), 45–56 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA et al. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology69(2), 300–305 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yohannes P, Burjonrappa SC. Rapid communication: laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robot: technical considerations. J. Endourol.17(2), 79–83 (2003)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology61(4), 699–702 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Lavery HJ, Thaly RK, Patel V et al. Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Urology (Suppl. 3A), 67 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J. Urol.169, 1261–1266 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique. Oncological results in the first 500 patients. J. Urol.173, 761–764 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J. Urol.174, 1271–1275 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ et al. Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.174(1), 135–139 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J. Urol.174, 908–911 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy – the experience of the german laparoscopic working group. Eur. Urol.49, 113–119 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden CG, Moon DA. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: minimum 3-year follow-up of the first 100 patients in the UK. Br. J. Urol. Int.97(5), 981–984 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Touijer AK, Kuroiwa K, Vickers A et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.49, 853–858 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering T, Woo D, Eichel L et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. A comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology63(5), 819–822 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden C, Moon D. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. minimum 3-year follow-up of the first 100 patients in the UK. Br.J. Urol. Int.97, 981–984 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J. Urol.171, 1212–1215 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Vallencien G et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.43, 123–133 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su L, Link R, Bhayani S et al. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique. Urology64(1), 123–127 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur. Urol.40(1), 46–52 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.168(5), 2078–2082 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh P, Marschke P, Ricker D et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.55(1), 58–61 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penson D, McLerran D, Feng Z et al. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J. Urol.173, 1701–1705 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar