State-of-the-art surgical management of renal cell carcinoma

References

• Rendon RA, Jewett MA. Expectant management for the treatment of small renal masses. Urol. Oncol.24, 62–67 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Incidence and Mortality Data. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Chow WH, Devessa SS, Warrren JL, Fraumeni JF. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA281, 1628–1631 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Wei JT. National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology67, 254–259 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J. Natl Cancer Inst.98(18), 1331–1334 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permpongkosol S, Bagga HS, Romero FR, Solomon SB, Kavoussi LR. Trends in the operative management of renal tumours over a 14-year period. Br. J. Urol. Int.98, 751–755 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology51, 203–205 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T et al. The natural history of small, incidentally detected renal masses. J. Urol.164, 1143–1147 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe A, Panzarella T, Rendon RA, Haider MA, Kondylis FI, Jewett MA. The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer100(4), 738–745 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehle MJ, Thiel DD, Petrou SP, Young PR, Frank I, Karsteadt N. Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology64(1), 49–52 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb GWA, Bromwich EJ, Vasey P, Aitchison M. Management of renal masses in patients medically unsuitable for nephrectomy – natural history, complications and outcome. Urology64, 909–913 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, Greenberg RE, Chen DYT, Uzzo RG. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J. Urol.175, 425–431 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotta AR, Wildschultz T, Raviv G et al. Radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation is a possible new modality for treatment of renal cancer: ex vivo and in vivo experience. J. Endourol.11, 251–258 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Novick AC, Soble JJ et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: initial clinical series. Urology52, 543–551 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane LA, Clayman RV. Review of minimally invasive renal therapies: needle-based and extracorporeal. Urology68(Suppl. 1A), 26–37 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill IS, Remer EM, Hasan WA et al. Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years. J. Urol.173, 1903–1907 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cestari A, Guazzoni G, dell’Acqua V et al. Laparoscopic cryoablation of solid renal masses: intermediate term follow-up. J. Urol.172, 1267–1270 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Aron M, Rewcastle JC, Gill IS. Cryotherapy: clinical end-points and their experimental foundations. Urology68, 38–44 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson DB, Solomon SB, Su LM et al. Defining the complications of cryoablation and radio frequency ablation of small renal tumors: a multi-institutional review. J. Urol.172, 874–877 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty NJ, Gill IS, Desai MM, Remer EM, O’Malley CM, Kaouk JH. Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology68(Suppl. 1A), 7–13 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb S, Rubenstein RA, Nadler RB. Using laparoscopic cryotherapy for renal tumors. Issues Urology18(4), 151–154 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Schenk GS, Dimarco DS, Farrell MA et al. Image-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors J. Urol.173, 293 (2005) (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Anderson JK, Matsumoto ED, Lotan Y, Josephs S, Cadeddu JA. Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J. Endourol.8, 569–573 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DB, Saboorian MH, Duchene DA et al. Nephrectomy after radiofrequency ablation – induced ureteropelvic junction obstruction: potential compication and long-term assesment of ablation adequacy. Urology62(2), 351–352 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen NK, Perry KT, Han KR et al. The effects of intentional cryoablation and radio frequency ablation of renal tissue involving the collecting system in a porcine model. J. Urol.173, 1368–1374 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugi D, Park S, Shingleton WB, Cadeddu JA. No difference in complications after direct ureteropelvic junction cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation. Presented at: 24th World Congress of Endourology. Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 17–20 August 2006 (Abstract VP2–10).
   Google Scholar
• Matin SF, Ahrar K, Cadeddu JA et al. Residual and recurrent disease following renal energy ablative therapy: a multi-institutional study. J. Urol.176, 1973–1977 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N. Engl. J. Med.324, 1370–1371 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology62(6), 1018–1023 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J. Urol.167(3), 1257–1262 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadeddu JA, Ono Y, Clayman RV et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multicenter experience. Urology52(5), 773–777 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al. Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J. Urol.174(4 Pt 1), 1222–1225 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J. Urol.164, 1153–1159 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer92, 1843–1855 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varkarakis I, Neururer R, Harabayashi T, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the elderly. Br. J. Urol. Int.94(4), 517–520 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Anast JW, Stoller ML, Meng MV et al. Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy. J. Urol.172(6 Pt 1), 2287–2291 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg SP, Finelli A, Desai MM et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J. Urol.172, 2172–2176 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stifelman MD, Handler T, Nieder AM et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopy for large renal specimens: a multi-institutional study. Urology61(1), 78–82 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Leveillee RJ. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for stage T1 and large stage T2 renal tumors. J. Endourol.17(6), 379–383 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor A, Nguan C, Al-Shaiji TF et al. Laparoscopic management of advanced renal cell carcinoma with level 1 renal vein thrombus. Urology68, 514–517 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MM, Gill IS, Ramani AP, Matin SF, Kaouk JH, Campero JM. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer with level I renal vein involvement. J. Urol.169(2), 487–491 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varkarakis IM, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Inagaki T, Gonzalgo ML, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic-assisted nephrectomy with inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: preliminary results. Urology64, 925–929 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram CP, Rehman J, Landman et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus. J. Urol.168, 176–179 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall FF, Reitz BA, Diamond DA. A new technique for management of renal cell carcinoma involving the right atrium. Hypothermia and cardiac arrest. J. Urol.131, 103–107 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciancio G, Livingstone AS, Soloway M. Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the renal and inferior vena cava: the University of Miami experience in using liver transplantation techniques. Eur. Urol.51, 988–995 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciancio G, Soloway M. Renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombous extending above the diaphragm: avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. Urology66, 266–270 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickisch GH, Garin A, van Poppel H, members of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Genitourinary Group. Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomized trial. Lancet358, 966–970 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA et al. Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2B alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.345, 1655–1659 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabets JC, Kaouk J, Fergany A et al. Laparoscopic versus open cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urology64, 930–934 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther MM, Lyne JC, Libutti SK et al. Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy as preparation for administration of systemic interleukin-2 in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study. Urology53, 496–501 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin SF, Madsen LT, Wood CG. Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Urology68, 528–532 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Dorey F et al. Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes: role of lymph node dissection. J. Urol.169(6), 2076–2083 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslyn SA, Sirintrapun SJ, Konety BR. Impact of lymphadenectomy and nodal burden in renal cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of the National Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Urology65, 675–680 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall FF. Lymphadenectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Br. J. Urol. Int.95(Suppl. 2), 34 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Miller DC, Taub DA, Dunn RL, Wei JT, Hollenbeck BK. Laparoscopy for renal cell carcinoma: diffusion versus regionalization. J. Urol.176, 1102–1107 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joudi FN, Konety BR. The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urologic cancer therapy. J. Urol.174, 432–438 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchene DA, Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, Clayman RV, Winfield HN. Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. J. Urol.176, 2158–2167 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD. National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery. Surg. Endosc.17, 864–867 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escarce JJ, Bloom BS, Hillman AL, Shea JA, Schwartz JS. Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in the United States. Med. Care33, 256–271 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuch B, Lam JS, Belldegrun AS. Open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Curr. Urol. Rep.7, 31–38 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J. Urol.171, 2181–2185 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin. Proc.75, 1236–1242 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam JS, Shvarts O, Alemozaffar M et al. Nephron-sparing surgery as the new gold standard for T1 (7cm) renal cell carcinoma: results of a contemporary UCLA series. J. Urol.171, 469 (2004) (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J. Urol.171, 1066–1070 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J. Urol.166, 6–18 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Blute ML. Complications of contemporary open nephron sparing surgery: a single institution experience. J. Urol.174(3), 855–858 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BR. Laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy – the new standard? Rev. Urol.5(1), 9–14 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J. Urol.167, 469–476 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J. Urol.174, 846–849 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol.49, 660–665 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalhav AL, Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC. Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology68, 508–513 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames CD, Perrone JM, Frisella AJ et al. Comparison of holding strength of suture anchors for hepatic and renal parenchyma. J. Endourol.19, 1221–1225 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Lee DI, Eichel L et al. Fibrin glue-oxidized cellulose sandwich for laparoscopic wedge resection of small renal lesions. J. Urol.173, 1477–1481 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrell SD, Levin BM. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of TissueLink™ hemostatic dissection device. J. Endourol.19, 446–450 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters RC, Collins MM, L’Esperance JO. Hemostatic techniques during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Curr. Opin. Urol.16, 327–331 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Abreu SC, Desai MM et al. Laparoscopic ice slush renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy: the initial experience. J. Urol.170(1), 52–56 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman J, Venkatesh R, Lee D et al. Renal hypothermia achieved by retrograde endoscopic cold saline perfusion: technique and initial clinical application. Urology61(5), 1023–1025 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janetschek G, Abdelmaksoud A, Bagheri F, Al-Zahrani H, Leeb K, Gschwendtner M. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia: renal artery perfusion. J. Urol.171, 68–71 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Rogers C et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. J. Urol.172, 871–873 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permpongkosol S, Bagga HS, Romero FR et al. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathologic T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate. Presented at: 24th World Congress of Endourology. Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 17–20 August 2006 (Abstract VP2–02).
   Google Scholar
• Lane BR, Gill IS. 5-year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J. Urol.177, 70–74 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaly R, Patel VR, Shah KK. The robotic revolution: advancing laparoscopy and urology further into the future. Contemp. Urol.18(10), 28–46 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Klingler DW, Hemstreet GP, Balaji KC. Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy – initial results of single-institution pilot study. Urology65(6), 1086–1089 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi T, Galich A, Sterrett S, Klingler D, Smith L, Balaji KC. Radical nephrectomy performed by open, laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. Int. Braz. J. Urol.32(1), 15–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with the Da Vinci robotic system. Urology64(5), 914–918 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J. Urol.176, 36–39 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker A, Michel MS, Marlinghaus E, Kohrmann KU, Alken P. Extracorporeally induced ablation of renal tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound. Br. J. Urol. Int.97, 779–785 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Marberger M, Schatzl G, Cranston D, Kennedy JE. Extracorporeal ablation of renal tumors with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Br. J. Urol. Int.95(Suppl. 2), 52–55 (2005).
   Google Scholar