Differentiating virulent 027 and non-027 Clostridium difficile strains by molecular methods

References

• Persson S, Jensen JN, Olsen KE. Multiplex PCR method for detection of Clostridium difficile tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, and cdtB and internal in-frame deletion of tcdC. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:4299-300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabler RA, He M, Dawson L, et al. Comparative genome and phenotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile 027 strains provides insight into the evolution of a hypervirulent bacterium. Genome Biol 2009;10:R102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingle KE, Griffiths D, Didelot X, et al. Clinical Clostridium difficile: clonality and pathogenicity locus diversity. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e19993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiente E, Dawson LF, Cairns MD, et al. Emergence of new PCR ribotypes from the hypervirulent Clostridium difficile 027 lineage. J Med Microbiol 2012;61:49-56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killgore G, Thompson A, Johnson S, et al. Comparison of seven techniques for typing international epidemic strains of Clostridium difficile: restriction endonuclease analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR-ribotyping, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and surface layer protein A gene sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:431-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obuch-Woszczatyński P, Lachowicz D, Schneider A, et al. Occurrence of Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 027 and it’s closely related PCR-ribotype 176 in hospitals in Poland in 2008-2010. Anaerobe 2014;28:13-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyč O, Pituch H, Matějková J, et al. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 176 in the Czech Republic and Poland. Lancet 2011;377:1407
   Google Scholar
• Lim SK, Stuart RL, Mackin KE, et al. Emergence of a ribotype 244 strain of Clostridium difficile associated with severe disease and related to the epidemic ribotype 027 strain. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:1723-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs SL, Brazier JS, O’Neill GL, Duerden BI. PCR targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:461-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Hundsberger T, Leukel P, et al. Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile. Gene 1996;181:29-38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antikainen J, Pasanen T, Mero S, et al. Detection of virulence genes of Clostridium difficile by multiplex PCR. APMIS 2009;117:607-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylisiurua P, Koskela M, Vainio O, Tuokko H. Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins. Scand J Infect Dis 2013;45:19-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCannell DR, Louie TJ, Gregson DB, et al. Molecular analysis of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 isolates from Eastern and Western Canada. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:2147-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso S, Kirveskari J. Evaluation of real-time PCR based assay for detection of toxin producing Clostridium difficile; EVO838, the 25th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID). Copenhagen, Denmark: 2015
   Google Scholar
• Knetsch CW, Terveer EM, Lauber C, et al. Comparative analysis of an expanded Clostridium difficile reference strain collection reveals genetic diversity and evolution through six lineages. Infect Genet Evol 2012;12:1577-85
   Google Scholar
• McEllistrem MC, Carman RJ, Gerding DN, et al. A hospital outbreak of Clostridium difficile disease associated with isolates carrying binary toxin genes. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:265-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacci S, Mølbak K, Kjeldsen MK, Olsen KE. Binary toxin and death after Clostridium difficile infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:976-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter GP, Douce GR, Govind R, et al. The anti-sigma factor TcdC modulates hypervirulence in an epidemic BI/NAP1/027 clinical isolate of Clostridium difficile. PLoS Pathog 2011;7:e1002317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray R, Boyd D, Levett PN, et al. Truncation in the tcdC region of the Clostridium difficile PathLoc of clinical isolates does not predict increased biological activity of Toxin B or Toxin A. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:103
   Google Scholar
• Cartman ST, Kelly ML, Heeg D, et al. Precise manipulation of the Clostridium difficile chromosome reveals a lack of association between the tcdC genotype and toxin production. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78(13):4683-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry SR, Marsh JW, Muto CA, et al. tcdC genotypes associated with severe TcdC truncation in an epidemic clone and other strains of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:215-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert C, Coignard B, Hebert M, et al. ICD-Raisin Working Group. Clinical and microbiological features of Clostridium difficile infections in France: the ICD-RAISIN 2009 national survey. Med Mal Infect 2013;43:67-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker AS, Eyre DW, Wyllie DH, et al. Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database. Relationship between bacterial strain type, host biomarkers, and mortality in Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:1589-600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goorhuis A, Bakker D, Corver J, et al. Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47(9):1162-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre DW, Cule ML, Wilson DJ, et al. Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1195-205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar