620
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions: a systematic review

, &
Pages 67-84 | Received 15 Nov 2015, Accepted 04 Jan 2016, Published online: 03 Feb 2016

References

• This systematic review included RCTs of interventions intended to enhance patient adherence to prescribed medications. It revealed that only a minority of lowest risk of bias RCTs improved both adherence and clinical outcomes.

  • Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, et al. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD000011.
  • van Boven JF, Chavannes NH, van der Molen T, et al. Clinical and economic impact of non-adherence in COPD: a systematic review. Respir Med. 2014;108(1):103–113.
  • Chaiyachati KH, Ogbuoji O, Price M, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a rapid systematic review. Aids. 2014;28(Suppl 2):S187–204.
  • Mbuagbaw L, Sivaramalingam B, Navarro T, et al. Interventions for enhancing adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART): a systematic review of high quality studies. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(5):248–266.
  • Al-Aqeel S, Al-Sabhan J. Strategies for improving adherence to antiepileptic drug treatment in patients with epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:CD008312.
  • Schedlbauer A, Davies P, Fahey T. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid lowering medication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD004371.
  • Iuga AO, McGuire MJ. Adherence and health care costs. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:35–44.

• This review provided extensive discussion on the magnitude of nonadherence to medications and its associated costs in the context of the US health system.

  • IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Avoidable costs in US health care. The $200 billion opportunity from using medicines more responsibly [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Nov 15]. Available from: http://www.imshealth.com/en/thought-leadership/ims-institute/reports/avoidable-costs.
  • Mennini FS, Marcellusi A, von der Schulenburg JM, et al. Cost of poor adherence to anti-hypertensive therapy in five European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16(1):65–72.
  • Simon-Tuval T, Triki N, Chodick G, et al. The association between adherence to cardiovascular medications and healthcare utilization. Eur J Health Econ. 2015. doi:10.1007/s10198-015-0703-z.
  • Dilla T, Ciudad A, Alvarez M. Systematic review of the economic aspects of nonadherence to antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:275–284.
  • Mathes T, Pieper D, Antoine SL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions for highly active antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(3):227–233.

• This review focuses on the cost-effectiveness of interventions targeted at improving adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy. It argues that although favorable ICERs were estimated, a definitive conclusion cannot be derived due to limited quality of the methodologies applied.

  • Chapman RH, Kowal SL, Cherry SB, et al. The modeled lifetime cost-effectiveness of published adherence-improving interventions for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications. Value Health. 2010;13(6):685–694.

• This systematic review analyzed the relative cost-effectiveness of various interventions and revealed that reminders, educational materials and a pharmacist/nurse management program, appear to be and should be considered before other interventions.

  • Oberje EJ, De Kinderen RJ, Evers SM, et al. Cost effectiveness of medication adherence-enhancing interventions: a systematic review of trial-based economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1155–1168.

•• A valuable systematic review that examined the cost-effectiveness of RCT-based interventions to improve adherence to medications. The authors evaluated the studies’ quality as modest and reffered to their narrow economic perspectives, thus recommended to apply more comprehensive economic evaluations.

  • Altowaijri A, Phillips CJ, Fitzsimmons D. A systematic review of the clinical and economic effectiveness of clinical pharmacist intervention in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(5):408–416.
  • Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry [Internet]. (Boston), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center. Available from: www.cearegistry.org.
  • Neumann PJ, Greenberg D, Olchanski NV, et al. Growth and quality of the cost-utility literature, 1976-2001. Value Health. 2005;8(1):3–9.
  • Neumann PJ, Thorat T, Shi J, et al. The changing face of the cost-utility literature, 1990-2012. Value Health. 2015;18(2):271–277.
  • Keeler EB, Robalino DA, Frank JC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of outpatient geriatric assessment with an intervention to increase adherence. Med Care. 1999;37(12):1199–1206.
  • Freedberg KA, Hirschhorn LR, Schackman BR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(Suppl 1):S113–8.
  • Zaric GS, Bayoumi AM, Brandeau ML, et al. The cost-effectiveness of counseling strategies to improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among men who have sex with men. Med Decis Making. 2008;28(3):359–376.
  • Van Keulen HM, Bosmans JE, Van Tulder MW, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, and a combination of the two: results of an economic evaluation alongside the Vitalum randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:64.
  • Begh RA, Aveyard P, Upton P, et al. Promoting smoking cessation in Pakistani and Bangladeshi men in the UK: pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of trained community outreach workers. Trials. 2011;12:197.
  • Murphy SM, Edwards RT, Williams N, et al. An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(8):745–753.
  • Ito K, Shrank WH, Avorn J, et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence after myocardial infarction. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(6):2097–2117.
  • Herman WH, Edelstein SL, Ratner RE, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diabetes prevention among adherent participants. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(3):194–202.
  • Patel A, McCrone P, Leese M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of adherence therapy versus health education for people with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial in four European countries. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013;11(1):12.
  • Plumpton CO, Brown I, Reuber M, et al. Economic evaluation of a behavior-modifying intervention to enhance antiepileptic drug adherence. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;45:180–186.
  • Ladabaum U, Mannalithara A, Jandorf L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals. Cancer. 2015;121(7):1088–1097.
  • Wilson FA, Villarreal R, Stimpson JP, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(2):260–267.
  • Korn P, Patel ST, Heller JA, et al. Why insurers should reimburse for compression stockings in patients with chronic venous stasis. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):950–957.
  • Rosen AB, Hamel MB, Weinstein MC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of full medicare coverage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for beneficiaries with diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):89–99.
  • Choudhry NK, Patrick AR, Antman EM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of providing full drug coverage to increase medication adherence in post-myocardial infarction Medicare beneficiaries. Circulation. 2008;117(10):1261–1268.
  • Dhalla IA, Smith MA, Choudhry NK, et al. Costs and benefits of free medications after myocardial infarction. Healthc Policy. 2009;5(2):68–86.
  • Ito K, Elkin E, Blinder V, et al. Cost-effectiveness of full coverage of aromatase inhibitors for Medicare beneficiaries with early breast cancer. Cancer. 2013;119(13):2494–2502.
  • Billings ME, Kapur VK. Medicare long-term CPAP coverage policy: a cost-utility analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013;9(10):1023–1029.
  • Ito K, Avorn J, Shrank WH, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of providing full coverage for preventive medications after myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8(3):252–259.
  • Gordois A, Armour C, Brillant M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a pharmacy asthma care program in Australia. Dis Manag Health Out. 2007;15(6):387–396.
  • Yu J, Shah BM, Ip EJ, et al. A Markov model of the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist care for diabetes in prevention of cardiovascular diseases: evidence from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(2):102–114.
  • Rubio-Valera M, Bosmans J, Fernandez A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a community pharmacist intervention in patients with depression: a randomized controlled trial (PRODEFAR Study). PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70588.
  • van Boven JF, Tommelein E, Boussery K, et al. Improving inhaler adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Respir Res. 2014;15:66.
  • Vegter S, Oosterhof P, Van Boven JF, et al. Improving adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in a community pharmacy intervention program: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20(7):722–732.
  • Twigg MJ, Wright D, Barton GR, et al. The four or more medicines (FOMM) support service: results from an evaluation of a new community pharmacy service aimed at over-65s. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015. doi:10.1111/ijpp.12196.
  • Earnshaw SR, Graham CN, Ettinger B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapies for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: implications of improved persistence with less frequently administered oral bisphosphonates. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(10):2517–2529.
  • Connolly MP, Nielsen SK, Currie CJ, et al. An economic evaluation comparing once daily with twice daily mesalazine for maintaining remission based on results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Crohns Colitis. 2009;3(1):32–37.
  • Ascher-Svanum H, Furiak NM, Lawson AH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of several atypical antipsychotics in orally disintegrating tablets compared with standard oral tablets in the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States. J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):531–547.
  • Gaebler JA, Soto-Campos G, Alperin P, et al. Health and economic outcomes for exenatide once weekly, insulin, and pioglitazone therapies in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a simulation analysis. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:255–264.
  • Colombo GL, Di Matteo S, Maggiolo F. Antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients: a proposal to assess the economic value of the single-tablet regimen. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:59–68.
  • Connolly MP, Kuyvenhoven JP, Postma MJ, et al. Cost and quality-adjusted life year differences in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis using once-daily 4 g or twice-daily 2g mesalazine dosing. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8(5):357–362.
  • Becerra V, Gracia A, Desai K, et al. Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):e007111.
  • Goldie SJ, Paltiel AD, Weinstein MC, et al. Projecting the cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Med. 2003;115(8):632–641.
  • Brunenberg DE, Wetzels GE, Nelemans PJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of an adherence-improving programme in hypertensive patients. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(3):239–251.
  • McCabe CJ, Goldie SJ, Fisman DN. The cost-effectiveness of directly observed highly-active antiretroviral therapy in the third trimester in HIV-infected pregnant women. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10154.
  • Ownby RL, Waldrop-Valverde D, Jacobs RJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of a computer-delivered intervention to improve HIV medication adherence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:29.
  • Cronin P, Goodall S, Lockett T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an advance notification letter to increase colorectal cancer screening. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(3):261–268.
  • Trenaman L, Sadatsafavi M, Almeida F, et al. Exploring the potential cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids for use in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a case study. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(5):671–682.
  • Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Lier DA, et al. Persistence, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(3):261–270.
  • Gopalappa C, Farnham PG, Hutchinson AB, et al. Cost effectiveness of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy goal of increasing linkage to care for HIV-infected persons. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61(1):99–105.
  • Carrion JA, Gonzalez-Colominas E, Garcia-Retortillo M, et al. A multidisciplinary support programme increases the efficiency of pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2013;59(5):926–933.
  • Kominski GF, Varon SF, Morisky DE, et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of adolescent compliance with treatment for latent tuberculosis infection: results from a randomized trial. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(1):61–68.
  • Babigumira JB, Sethi AK, Smyth KA, et al. Cost effectiveness of facility-based care, home-based care and mobile clinics for provision of antiretroviral therapy in Uganda. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):963–973.
  • Rosen AB, Spaulding AB, Greenberg D, et al. Patient adherence: a blind spot in cost-effectiveness analyses? Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(9):626–632.
  • Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

• This comprehensive overview of sources of non-adherence provides the theoretical basis for the design of adherence-enhancing interventions.

  • Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Jama. 2002;288(14):1775–1779.
  • Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health. 2015;18(2):161–172.
  • Heisler M, Choi H, Rosen AB, et al. Hospitalizations and deaths among adults with cardiovascular disease who underuse medications because of cost: a longitudinal analysis. Med Care. 2010;48(2):87–94.
  • Choudhry NK, Saya UY, Shrank WH, et al. Cost-related medication underuse: prevalence among hospitalized managed care patients. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(2):104–109.
  • Kennedy J, Morgan S. Cost-related prescription nonadherence in the United States and Canada: a system-level comparison using the 2007 International Health Policy Survey in Seven Countries. Clin Ther. 2009;31(1):213–219.
  • Kemp A, Roughead E, Preen D, et al. Determinants of self-reported medicine underuse due to cost: a comparison of seven countries. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(2):106–114.
  • Guessous I, Gaspoz JM, Theler JM, et al. High prevalence of forgoing healthcare for economic reasons in Switzerland: a population-based study in a region with universal health insurance coverage. Prev Med. 2012;55(5):521–527.
  • Briesacher BA, Gurwitz JH, Soumerai SB. Patients at-risk for cost-related medication nonadherence: a review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):864–871.
  • Chernew ME, Rosen AB, Fendrick AM. Value-based insurance design. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(2):w195–203.
  • Fendrick AM, Chernew ME. Value-based insurance design: a “clinically sensitive” approach to preserve quality of care and contain costs. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(1):18–20.
  • Fendrick AM, Smith DG, Chernew ME, et al. A benefit-based copay for prescription drugs: patient contribution based on total benefits, not drug acquisition cost. Am J Manag Care. 2001;7(9):861–867.
  • Choudhry NK, Fischer MA, Avorn J, et al. The implications of therapeutic complexity on adherence to cardiovascular medications. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(9):814–822.
  • Bell CM, Urbach DR, Ray JG, et al. Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332(7543):699–703.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.