Are the economics of complementary and alternative medicine different to conventional medicine?

References

• Xue C, Zhang A, Lin V, Da Costa C, Story D. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: a national population-based survey. J. Altern. Complement. Med.13(6), 643–650 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D, Davis R, Ettner S et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA280(18), 1569–1575 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas K, Nicholl J, Coleman P. Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complement. Ther. Med.9, 2–11 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter I, Willis E. The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspective. Med. J. Aust.180, 587–589 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgi M, Theiss R, Sommer J. A randomised experiment of the effects of including alternative medicine in the mandatory benefit package of health insurance funds in Switzerland. Complement. Ther. Med.7, 54–61 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watts C, Lafferty W, Corage Baden A. The effect of mandating complementary and alternative medicine on insurance benefits in Washington State. J. Altern. Complement. Med.10(6), 1001–1008 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier K, Astin J, Haskell W. Current trends in the integration and reimbursement of complementary and alternative medicine by Managed Care Organisations (MCOs) and insurance providers: 1998 update and cohort analysis. Am. J. Health Promotion14(2), 125–133 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walach H. The Swiss program for the Evaluation of Complementary Medicine (PEK). J. Altern. Complement. Med.12(3), 231–232 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers E, Porter K. Price elasticities for three types of CAM services: experiences of a Boston public health clinic. J. Altern. Complement. Med.12(1), 85–90 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Haselen R. Complementary or alternative medicine: towards establishing ‘value for money’. Complement. Ther. Med.14, 1–2 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman P, Craig B, Caspi O. Is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cost-effective? A systematic review. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.5, 11 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arcury T, Bell R, Sniveley B et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use as health self-management: rural older adults with diabetes. J. Gerontol.61B(2), S62–S70 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Moolasarn S, Sripta S, Keussirikiet V et al. Usage and cost of complementary/alternative medicine in diabetic patients. J. Med. Assoc. Thai.88(11), 1630–1637 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metge C, Black C, Peterson S, Kozyrskyj A. The population’s use of pharmaceuticals. Med. Care37(6), JS42–JS59 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonov K, Isacson D. Use of analgesics in Sweden – the importance of sociodemographic factors, physical fitness, health and health-related factors, and working conditions. Soc. Sci. Med.42(11), 1473–1481 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzywacz J, Lang W, Suerken C, Quandt S, Bell R, Arcury T. Age, race, and ethnicity in the use of complementary and alternative medicine for health self-management: evidence from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. J. Aging Health17, 547–572 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas K, Coleman P. Use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National Omnibus survey. J. Public Health26(2), 152–157 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (3rd Edition). Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G (Eds). Oxford University Press, New York, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hulme C, Long A. Square pegs and round holes? A review of economic evaluation in complementary and alternative medicine. J. Altern. Complement. Med.11(1), 179–188 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White A, Ernst E. Economic analysis of complementary medicine: a systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med.8, 111–118 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason S, Tovey P, Long AF. Methodological challenges of randomised control trial evaluation for complementary and alternative therapies. BMJ325, 832–834 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes P, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin R. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv. Data343, 1–19 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvey K. Complementary medicine: handle with care. Issues84, 7–9 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Long AF. Outcome measurement in complementary and alternative medicine: unpicking the effects. J. Altern. Complement. Med.8, 777–786 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy C. Social science theory and methods in the study of alternative and complementary medicine. J. Altern. Complement. Med.2, 19–40 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Nahin RL, Straus E. Research into complementary and alternative medicine: problems and potential. BMJ322, 161–164 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculpher M, Drummond M, O’Brien B. Effectiveness, efficiency, and NICE. BMJ322, 943–944 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollinghurst S, Shaw A, Thompson EA. Capturing the value of complementary and alternative medicine: including patient preferences in economic evaluation. Complement. Ther. Med.16, 47–51 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe J, van Haselen R, Buxton M, Hardy K, Colehan J, Partridge M. Assessing patients’ preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study. Thorax57, 503–508 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirois F, Gick M. An investigation of the health beliefs and motivations of complementary medicine clients. Soc. Sci. Med.55, 1025–1037 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar