Exploring local immune responses to vaccines using efferent lymphatic cannulation

References

• Swartz MA. The physiology of the lymphatic system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;50(1-2):3-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gashev AA. Physiologic aspects of lymphatic contractile function: current perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;979:178-87; discussion 188-196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Veer M, Kemp J, Chatelier J, et al. Modulation of soluble and particulate antigen transport in afferent lymph by monophosphoryl lipid A. Immunol Cell Biol 2012;90(4):404-10
   Google Scholar
• Yen HH, Wee JL, Snibson KJ, Scheerlinck JP. Thoracic duct cannulation without thoracotomy in sheep: a method for accessing efferent lymph from the lung. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2009;129(1-2):76-81
   Google Scholar
• Hall JG, Morris B. The origin of the cells in the efferent lymph from a single lymph node. J Exp Med 1965;121:901-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraal G, Mebius RE. High endothelial venules: lymphocyte traffic control and controlled traffic. Adv Immunol 1997;65:347-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gretz JE, Anderson AO, Shaw S. Cords, channels, corridors and conduits: critical architectural elements facilitating cell interactions in the lymph node cortex. Immunol Rev 1997;156:11-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajenoff M, Granjeaud S, Guerder S. The strategy of T cell antigen-presenting cell encounter in antigen-draining lymph nodes revealed by imaging of initial T cell activation. J Exp Med 2003;198(5):715-24
   Google Scholar
• Hay JB. A study of the in vitro metabolism of androgens by human scalp and pubic skin. Br J Dermatol 1977;97(3):237-46
   Google Scholar
• Bujdoso R, Hopkins J, Dutia BM, et al. Characterization of sheep afferent lymph dendritic cells and their role in antigen carriage. J Exp Med 1989;170(4):1285-301
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Cornil I, Epardaud M, Bonneau M. Cervical duct cannulation in sheep for collection of afferent lymph dendritic cells from head tissues. Nat Protoc 2006;1(2):874-9
   Google Scholar
• Neeland MR, Meeusen EN, de Veer MJ. Afferent lymphatic cannulation as a model system to study innate immune responses to infection and vaccination. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2014;158(1-2):86-97
   Google Scholar
• Hall JG, Morris B. The output of cells in lymph from the popliteal node of sheep. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 1962;47:360-9
   Google Scholar
• Windon RG, Chaplin PJ, McWaters P, et al. Local immune responses to influenza antigen are synergistically enhanced by the adjuvant ISCOMATRIX. Vaccine 2001;20(3-4):490-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DG, Gershwin LJ, Snider TGIII. Celiac trunk cannulation for obtaining abomasal lymph from cattle. Am J Vet Res 1991;52(7):1117-20
   Google Scholar
• Hope JC, Guzman E, Cubillos-Zapata C, et al. Migratory sub-populations of afferent lymphatic dendritic cells differ in their interactions with Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette Guerin. Vaccine 2012;30(13):2357-67
   Google Scholar
• Gershwin LJ, Gunther RA, Smith SG, et al. Thoracic lymphatic cannulation for the study of pulmonary immune responses in lung lymph of calves. Am J Vet Res 1995;56(12):1586-91
   Google Scholar
• Rothkotter HJ, Huber T, Barman NN, Pabst R. Lymphoid cells in afferent and efferent intestinal lymph: lymphocyte subpopulations and cell migration. Clin Exp Immunol 1993;92(2):317-22
   Google Scholar
• Chuang GJ, Gao CX, Mulder DS, Chiu RC. Technique of right lymphatic duct cannulation for pulmonary lymph collection in an acute porcine model. J Surg Res 1986;41(6):563-8
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang JG, Li YP, Lin ZF. A modified rat model for cannulation and collection of thoracic duct lymph. Lymphology 2011;44(2):82-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig DM, Hopkins J, Miller HR. Local immune responses in afferent and efferent lymph. Immunology 1999;96(2):155-63
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton JA, Anderson GP. GM-CSF biology. Growth Factors 2004;22(4):225-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill RN, Frost H, Trnka Z. The effects of antigen on the migration of recirculating lymphocytes through single lymph nodes. J Exp Med 1976;143(4):870-88
   Google Scholar
• Windon RG, Chaplin PJ, Beezum L, et al. Induction of lymphocyte recruitment in the absence of a detectable immune response. Vaccine 2000;19(4-5):572-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell I, Hopkins J, Lachmann P. Lymphocyte traffic through lymph nodes during cell shutdown. Ciba Found Symp 1980;71:167-95
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins J, McConnell I, Pearson JD. Lymphocyte traffic through antigen-stimulated lymph nodes. II. Role of Prostaglandin E2 as a mediator of cell shutdown. Immunology 1981;42(2):225-31
   Google Scholar
• Bujdoso R, Young P, Hopkins J, et al. Non-random migration of CD4 and CD8 T cells: changes in the CD4: CD8 ratio and interleukin 2 responsiveness of efferent lymph cells following in vivo antigen challenge. Eur J Immunol 1989;19(10):1779-84
   Google Scholar
• Hall JG. A method for collecting lymph from the prefemoral lymph node of unanaesthetised sheep. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 1967;52(2):200-5
   Google Scholar
• Yen HH, Scheerlinck JP, Gekas S, Sutton P. A sheep cannulation model for evaluation of nasal vaccine delivery. Methods 2006;38(2):117-23
   Google Scholar
• Adams DB, Cripps AW. Cellular changes in the intestinal lymph of sheep infected with the enteric nematode, Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 1977;55(5):509-22
   Google Scholar
• Wee JL, Greenwood DL, Han X, Scheerlinck JP. Inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-alpha regulate lymphocyte trafficking through the local lymph node. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011;144(1-2):95-103
   Google Scholar
• Rothel JS, Corner LA, Lightowlers MW, et al. Antibody and cytokine responses in efferent lymph following vaccination with different adjuvants. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1998;63(1-2):167-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothel JS, Corner LA, Seow HF, et al. Antigen-specific IgA-secreting cells induced by peripheral vaccination. Immunol Cell Biol 1996;74(3):298-300
   Google Scholar
• Bode C, Zhao G, Steinhagen F, et al. CpG DNA as a vaccine adjuvant. Expert Rev Vaccines 2011;10(4):499-511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeland MR, Elhay MJ, Nathanielsz J, et al. Incorporation of CpG into a liposomal vaccine formulation increases the maturation of antigen-loaded dendritic cells and monocytes to improve local and systemic immunity. J Immunol 2014;192(8):3666-75
   Google Scholar
• Scheerlinck JP, Gloster S, Gamvrellis A, et al. Systemic immune responses in sheep, induced by a novel nano-bead adjuvant. Vaccine 2006;24(8):1124-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamvrellis A, Walsh K, Tatarczuch L, et al. Phenotypic analysis of ovine antigen presenting cells loaded with nanoparticles migrating from the site of vaccination. Methods 2013;60(3):257-63
   Google Scholar
• Gamvrellis A, Gloster S, Jefferies M, et al. Characterisation of local immune responses induced by a novel nano-particle based carrier-adjuvant in sheep. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2013;155(1-2):21-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JG, Morris B. The lymph-borne cells of the immune response. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 1963;48:235-47
   Google Scholar
• Mackay CR, Marston W, Dudler L. Altered patterns of T cell migration through lymph nodes and skin following antigen challenge. Eur J Immunol 1992;22(9):2205-10
   Google Scholar
• Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, et al. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999;401(6754):708-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn L, Hession C, Tizard R, et al. Direct expression cloning of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, a cytokine-induced endothelial protein that binds to lymphocytes. Cell 1989;59(6):1203-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlin RL, Watson DL. The secondary immune response to Staphylococcus aureus vaccines in efferent popliteal lymph of sheep. Immunology 1987;60(2):295-301
   Google Scholar
• Watson DL. Serological response of sheep to live and killed Staphylococcus aureus vaccines. Vaccine 1987;5(4):275-8
   Google Scholar
• Kerlin RL, Watson DL. Effect of dextran sulphate on IgG subclass of antibody in efferent popliteal lymph of sheep. Immunol Cell Biol 1987;65(Pt 5):411-17
   Google Scholar
• Gohin I, Olivier M, Lantier I, et al. Analysis of the immune response in sheep efferent lymph during Salmonella abortusovis infection. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1997;60(1-2):111-30
   Google Scholar
• Lascelles AK, Morris B. Surgical techniques for the collection of lymph from unanaesthetized sheep. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 1961;46:199-205
   Google Scholar
• Leak LV, Liotta LA, Krutzsch H, et al. Proteomic analysis of lymph. Proteomics 2004;4(3):753-65
   Google Scholar
• Bond JJ, Pernthaner A, Zhang K, et al. Efferent intestinal lymph protein responses in nematode-resistant, -resilient and -susceptible lambs under challenge with Trichostrongylus colubriformis. J Proteomics 2014;109C:356-67
   Google Scholar
• Gils A, Declerck PJ. Structure-function relationships in serpins: current concepts and controversies. Thromb Haemost 1998;80(4):531-41
   Google Scholar
• Mackay CR, Andrew DP, Briskin M, et al. Phenotype, and migration properties of three major subsets of tissue homing T cells in sheep. Eur J Immunol 1996;26(10):2433-9
   Google Scholar
• Cahill RNP, Poskitt DC, Frost H, Trnka Z. Two distinct pools of recirculating T lymphocytes - migratory characteristics of nodal and intestinal T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 1977;145(2):420-8
   Google Scholar
• Scollay R, Hopkins J, Hall J. Possible role of surface Ig in non-random recirculation of small lymphocytes. Nature 1976;260(5551):528-9
   Google Scholar
• Iijima H, Takahashi I, Kiyono H. Mucosal immune network in the gut for the control of infectious diseases. Rev Med Virol 2001;11(2):117-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren J, Czerkinsky C. Mucosal immunity and vaccines. Nat Med 2005;11(4 Suppl):S45-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan VJ, Mikszta JA, Laurent P, et al. Noninvasive delivery technologies: respiratory delivery of vaccines. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2006;3(1):87-95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vujanic A, Sutton P, Snibson KJ, et al. Mucosal vaccination: lung versus nose. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012;148(1-2):172-7
   Google Scholar
• Wee JL, Scheerlinck JP, Snibson KJ, et al. Pulmonary delivery of ISCOMATRIX influenza vaccine induces both systemic and mucosal immunity with antigen dose sparing. Mucosal Immunol 2008;1(6):489-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub NC, Bland RD, Brigham KL, et al. Preparation of chronic lung lymph fistulas in sheep. J Surg Res 1975;19(5):315-20
   Google Scholar
• Meeusen EN, Brandon MR. Antibody secreting cells as specific probes for antigen identification. J Immunol Methods 1994;172(1):71-6
   Google Scholar
• Meeusen E, Brandon M. The use of antibody-secreting cell probes to reveal tissue-restricted immune responses during infection. Eur J Immunol 1994;24(2):469-74
   Google Scholar