Implantable rhythm devices and electromagnetic interference: myth or reality?

References

• Pinski SL, Trohman RG. Interference in implanted cardiac devices. Part 1. PACE25(9), 1367–1381 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sweesy MW. Understanding electromagnetic interference. Heart Rhythm4, 523–524 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Santomauro M, Da Prato D, Ottaviano L, Borrelli A, Chiarello M. Recommendations for the protection against electromagnetic interference risk caused by pacemakers and implantable defibrillators in hospitals. Ital. Heart J. Suppl.3, 440–445 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trigano A, Blandeau O, Souques M, Genez JP, Magne I. Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers by a magnetic field at power line frequencies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 896–900 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luechinger R, Duru F, Zeijlemaker VA, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas P. Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields? Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25, 1419–1423 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinski SL. Trohman RG, Interference in implanted cardiac devices. Part II. PACE25(9), 1496–1509 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Martin ET, Can cardiac pacemakers and magnetic resonance imaging systems co-exist? Eur. Heart J.26, 325–327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedel A, Hackenbroch M, Reinke M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain at 1.5 Tesla in patients with cardiac pacemakers: can it be done? J. Card. Magn. Reson.2, 39–40 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Valhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there reversible changes at 0.5 Tesla? PACE24, 489–495 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Avery E. Loss prevention case of the month. Not my responsibility! J. Tenn. Med. Assoc.81, 523 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiebler M, Kaut-Watson C, Williams D. Both sedated and critically ill require monitoring during MRI survey. MR41–45 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Coman JA, Martin ET, Ramza BM, Margolis PD, Fair RD. Pacemaker safety during magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37(Suppl. A), 436 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohost GM, Blackwell GG, Shellock FG. Safety of patients with medical devices during application of magnetic resonance methods. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.649, 302–312 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gimbel JR, Wilkoff BL, Kanal E, Rozner MA. Safe, sensible, sagacious: responsible scanning of pacemaker patients. Eur. Heart J.26, 1683–1691 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C et al. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace7, 353–365 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5 Tesla. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43(7), 1315–1324 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker dependent patients. Circulation114(12), 1285–1292 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerra L, Reddy PC. Effects of electromagnetic interference on implanted cardiac device and their management. Cardiol. Rev.15, 304–309 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naehle CP, Sommer T, Meyer C et al. Strategy for safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator. PACE29, 113–116 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel JR, Kanal E, Schwartz KM, Wilkoff BL. Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE28, 270–273 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Roguin A, Zviman MM, Meiniger GR et al. Modern pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe. Circulation110, 475–482 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiski R, Matsumoto N, Nakazawa K et al. Influence of mobile magnetic resonance imaging on implanted pacemakers. PACE26, 527–529 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kusumoto FM, Pedersen S, Golschlager N. Environmental Effects on Cardiac Pacing Systems. Cardiac Pacing for the Clinician. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PA, USA, 377–394 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sundar S, Symonds RP, Deehan C. Radiotherapy to patients with artificial cardiac pacemakers. Cancer Treat. Rev.31, 474–486 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurkmans CW, Scheepers E, Springorum BG et al. Influence of radiotherapy on the latest generation of pacemakers. Radiother. Oncol.76, 93–98 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurkmans CW, Scheepers E, Springorum BG, et al. Influence of radiotherapy on the latest version of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.63, 282–289 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solan AN, Solan MJ, Bednarz G, Goodkin MB. Treatment of patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardiovertor defibrillators during radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.59(3), 897–904 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbach JR, Sontag MR, Van Dyk J, Wolbarst AB. Management of radiation oncology patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers: report of APPM Task Group No 34. Medical Physics21(1), 85–90 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altamura G, Bianconi L, Lo Bianco F et al. Transthoracic DC shock may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients. PACE18(1), 194–198 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Proclemer A, Facchin D, Pagnutti C et al. Safety of pacemaker implantation prior to radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction is a single session procedure. PACE23, 998–1002 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer B, Tebbenjohanns J, Schumacher B et al. Pacemaker function during radiofrequency catheter ablation. PACE18, 1037–1044 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan O. Electromagnetic interference on pacemakers, Brief review. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J.2(3), 74–78 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VanHemel NM, Hamerlijnk RP, Pronk KJ, et al. Upper limit ventricular stimulation in respiratory rate responsive pacing due to electrocautery. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.12, 1720–1723 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irnich W. Interference in pacemakers. PACE1021–1048 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Albers DD, Lybrand FE III, Axton JC et al. Shockwave lithotripsy and pacemakers: experience of 20 cases. J. Endourol.9, 301–303 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung MK, Streem SB, Ching E et al. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave litotripsy on tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator. PACE22, 738–742 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Dubner S, Dubner Y, Gallino S et al. Electromagnetic interference with implantable cardiac pacemakers by video capsule. Gastrointest. Endosc.61, 205–204 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bandorski D, Irnich W, Bruck M et al. Capsule endoscopy and cardiac pacemakers: investigation for possible interference. Endoscopy40, 36–39 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubner S, Dubner Y, Rubio H, Goldin E. Electromagnetic interference from wireless video-capsule endoscopy on implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE30, 472–475 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen MJ, Hayes DL, Vliestra RE et al. Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be safely used in patients with permanent pacemakers? Mayo Clin. Proc.63, 443 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmgren C, Carlsson T, Mannheimer C, Edvarsson N. Risk of interference from transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the sensing function of implantable defibrillators. PACE31, 151–158 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes DL, Wabg PJ, Reynolds DW et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N. Engl. J. Med.336, 1473–1479 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigano A, Blandeau O, Dale C, Wong MF, Wiart J. Reliability of electromagnetic filters of cardiac pacemakers tested by cellular telephone ringing. Heart Rhythm2(8), 837–841 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassen HI, Moore HJ, Ruggers PS. Cellular phone interference testing of implantable cardiac defibrillators in-vitro. PACE21, 1709–1715 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Tandogan I, Ozin B, Bozbas H et al. Effects of mobile telephones on the function of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol.10(4), 409–413 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tri JL, Trusty JM, Hayes DL. Potential for personal digital assistant interference with implantable cardiac devices. Mayo Clin. Proc.79(12), 1527–1530 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MB, Thaker JP, Punnam S. Jongnarangsin K. Pacemaker interference with an iPod. Heart Rhythm4(6), 781–784 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basse H. Low frequency magnetic emissions and resulting induced voltages in a pacemaker by iPod portable music players. Biomed. Eng. Online7(1), 7 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carillo R, Stevenson R. iPods and pacemakers: no clinically significant electromagnetic interference. Abstract submitted for: Heart Rhythm Society Meeting 2008. San Francisco, CA, USA, 14–17 May, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wolber T, Salome R, Binggeli C et al. Potential interference of small neodymium magnets with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm4(1), 1–4 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolb C, Schmeider S, Lehmann G et al. Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers or cardioverter–defibrillators? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41, 2054–2059 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan NY, Ho LWL. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator shock due to external alternating current leak: Report of 2 cases. Eurospace7, 193–196 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar