Impact of left bundle branch block and activation pattern on the heart

References

• Eppinger H, Rothenberger J. Zur analyse des elektrokardiogramms. Wien Klin. Wochernscher.22, 1091 (1909).
   Google Scholar
• Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M et al. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am. Heart J.143, 398–405 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casiglia E, Spolaore P, Ginocchio G et al. Mortality in relation to Minnesota code items in elderly subjects. Sex-related differences in a cardiovascular study in the elderly. Jpn. Heart J.34, 567–577 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang X, Shen W, Gong L. Clinical significance of complete left bundle branch block in dilated cardiomyopathy. Chin. Med. Sci. J.10, 158–160 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins NM, Wang D, McMurray JJ et al.; CHARM Investigators and Committees. Prevalence and prognostic impact of bundle branch block in patients with heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme. Eur. J. Heart Fail.9, 510–517 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H et al. Functional abnormalities in isolated left-bundle branch-block – the effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation79, 845–853 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murkofsky RL, Dangas G, Diamond JA et al. A prolonged QRS duration on surface electrocardiogram is a specific indicator of left ventricular dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.32, 476–482 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littmann L, Symanski JD. Hemodynamic implications of left bundle branch block. J. Electrocardiol.33, 115–121 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiao HB, Lee CH, Gibson DG. Effect of left bundle branch block on diastolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy. Br. Heart J.66, 443–447 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley DJ, Bradley EA, Baughman KL et al. Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA289, 730–740 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider JF, Thomas HE, Kreger BE et al. Acquired left bundle-branch block: the Framingham study. Ann. Intern. Med.90, 303–310 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toquero J, Geelen P, Goethals M, Rugada P. What is first, left bundle branch block or left ventricular dysfunction? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.12, 1425–1428 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zannad F, Huvelle E, Dickstein K et al. Left bundle branch block as a risk factor for progression to heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail.9, 7–14 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc JJ, Fatemi M, Bertault V et al. Evaluation of left bundle branch block as a reversible cause of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy with severe heart failure. A new concept of left ventricular dyssynchrony-induced cardiomyopathy. Europace7, 604–610 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shan Q, Jin Y, Cao K. Reversible left ventricular dyssynchrony and dysfunction resulting from right ventricular pre-excitation. Europace9, 697–701 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iuliano S, Fisher SG, Karasik PE et al. QRS duration and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. Am. Heart J.143, 1085–1091 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra PR, Sharma R, Shamim W et al. Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with chronic heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. Int. J. Cardiol.86, 225–231 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu R, Bahler RC. Prevalence of QRS prolongation in a community hospital cohort of patients with heart failure and its relation to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Am. J. Cardiol.93, 244–246 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamim W, Yousufuddin M, Cicoria M et al. Incremental changes in QRS duration in serial ECGs over time identify high risk elderly patients with heart failure. Heart88, 47–51 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldasseroni S, Gentile A, Gorini M et al. Intraventricular conduction defects in patients with congestive heart failure: left but not right bundle branch block is an independent predictor of prognosis. A report from the Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure (IN-CHF database). Ital. Heart J.4, 607–613 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu CM, Lin H, Zhang Q, Sanderson JE. High prevalence of left ventricular systolic and diastolic asynchrony in patients with congestive heart failure and normal QRS duration. Heart89, 54–60 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader H, Garrigue S, Lafitte S et al. Intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony. A new independent predictor of severe cardiac events in heart failure patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43, 248–256 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenkman HJ, Pampati V, Khandelwal AK et al. Congestive heart failure and QRS duration: establishing prognosis study. Chest122, 528–534 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky RL, Yudelman P, Cohen AI et al. Serial electrocardiographic changes in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy confirmed at necropsy. Am. J. Cardiol.62, 276–283 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamim W, Francis DP, Yousufuddin M et al. Intraventricular conduction delay: a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure. Int. J. Cardiol.70, 171–178 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellbrink C, Auricchio A, Diem B et al. Potential benefit of biventricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Am. J. Cardiol.83, 143D–150D (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiao HB, Roy C, Fujimoto S, Gibson DG. Natural history of abnormal conduction and its relation to prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol.53, 163–170 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grigioni F, Barbieri A, Magnani G et al. Serial versus isolated assessment of clinical and instrumental parameters in heart failure: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Am. Heart J.146, 298–303 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kearney MT, Zaman A, Eckberg DL et al. Cardiac size, autonomic function, and 5-year follow-up of chronic heart failure patients with severe prolongation of ventricular activation. J. Cardiac Fail.9, 93–99 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotman M, Thiebwasser JH. A clinical follow-up study of right and left bundle-branch block. Circulation51, 477–484 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegman-Igra Y, Yahini JH, Goldbourt U, Neufeld HN. Intraventricular conduction disturbances: a review of prevalence, etiology and progression for ten years within a stable population of Israeli adult males. Am. Heart J.96, 669–679 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson P, Hansson PO, Eriksson H et al. Bundle-branch block in a general male population: the study of men born 1913. Circulation98, 2494–2500 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imanishi R, Seto, S, Ichimaru, S et al. Prognostic significance of incident complete left bundle branch block observed over a 40-year period. Am. J. Cardiol.98, 644–648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenestrand U, Tabrizi F, Lindback J et al. Comorbidity and myocardial dysfunction are the main explanations for the higher 1-year mortality in acute myocardial infarction with left bundle-branch block. Circulation110, 1896–1902 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson P, Wilhelmsen L, Rosengren A. Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years. The Primary Prevention Study in Göteborg, Sweden. Eur. Heart J.26 (21), 2300–2306 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin SW, Matheson FA, Tate RB. Natural history of left bundle-branch block. Br. Heart J.43, 164–169 (1980).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider JF, Thomas HE Jr, Sorlie P et al. Comparative features of newly acquired left and right bundle branch block in the general population: the Framingham study. Am. J. Cardiol.47, 931–940 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrainsdottir IS, Hardarson T, Thorgeirsson G et al. The epidemiology of right bundle branch block and its association with cardiovascular morbidity – the Reykjavik Study. Eur. Heart J.14, 1590–1596 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse B, Diaz LA, Snader CE et al. Complete bundle branch block as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality: report of 7073 patients referred for nuclear exercise testing. Am. J. Med.110, 253–259 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das MK, Cheripambil K, Bedi A et al. Prolonged QRS duration (QRS≥170 ms) and left axis deviation in the presence of left bundle branch block: a marker of poor left ventricular systolic function. Am. Heart J.142, 756–759 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Igarashi M, Shiina Y, Tanabe T, Handa S. Significance of electrocardiographic QRS width in patients with congestive heart failure: a marker for biventricular pacing. J. Cardiol.40, 103–109 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SJ, McCulloch C, Mangat I et al. Isolated bundle branch block and left ventricular dysfunction. J. Cardiac Fail.9, 87–92 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freudenberger R, Sikora JA, Fisher M et al. Electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics of patients referred for cardiac transplantation: implications for pacing in heart failure. Clin. Cardiol.27, 151–153 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhingra R, Ho Nam B, Benjamin EJ et al. Cross-sectional relations of electrocardiographic QRS duration to left ventricular dimensions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 685–689 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabrizi F, Englund A, Rosenqvist M et al. Influence of left bundle branch block on long-term mortality in a population with heart failure. Eur. Heart J.28, 2449–2455 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bavelaar-Croon CD, Wahba FF, van Hecke MV et al. Perfusion and functional abnormalities outside the septal region in patients with left bundle branch block assessed with gated SPECT. QJ Nucl. Med.45, 108–114 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prinzen FW, Cheriex EC, Delhaas T et al. Asymmetric thickness of the left ventricular wall resulting from asynchronous electric activation: a study in dogs with ventricular pacing and in patients with left bundle branch block. Am. Heart J.130, 1045–1053 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raviele A, Piccolo E, Delise P, Caberlotto D, Di Pede F, Callegari E. Left bundle branch block pattern induced by premature right atrial stimulation. Electrogenetic and clinical considerations. G. Ital. Cardiol.11, 1026–1043 (1981)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn M. Left bundle branch block: variations on a theme. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.10, 81–82 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Marchlinski FE et al. Endocardial activation of left bundle branch block. Circulation69, 914–923 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F et al. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation109, 1133–1139 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M et al. Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation99, 2993–3001 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Butter C et al. Clinical efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular pacing in heart failure patients stratified by severity of ventricular conduction delay. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42, 2109–2116 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby RI, Weissman RH, Prakash MN, Hoffman I. Left bundle branch block: a predictor of poor left ventricular function in coronary artery disease. Am. Heart J.106, 471–477 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oosterhout MF, Prinzen FW, Arts T et al. Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation98, 588–595 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park C, Little WC, O’Rourk RA. Effect of alteration of left ventricular activation sequence on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure–volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ. Res.57, 706–717 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass DA. Ventricular resynchronization: pathophysiology and identification of responders. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med.4(Suppl. 2), S3–S13 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Xiao FIB, Brecker SJD, Gibson DG. Effects of abnormal activation on the time course of the left ventricular pressure pulse in dilated cardiomyopathy. Br. Heart J.68, 403–407 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Recke SH, Esperer HD, Eberlein U et al. Assessment of left ventricular function from the electrocardiogram in left bundle branch block. Int. J. Cardiol.24, 297–304 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi T, Sakai Y, Kobayashi S et al. Correlation between interventricular septal motion and left ventricular systolic-diastolic function in patients with left bundle branch block. J. Cardiol.35, 181–187 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu CM, Chau E, Sanderson JE et al. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure. Circulation105, 438–445 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Kim WY et al. Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.40, 723–730 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunekreeft JA, Graauw M, de Milliano PAR, Keijer JT. Influence of left bundle branch block on left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and regional wall motion. Neth. Heart J.15, 89–94 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramlet DA, Morris KG, Coleman RE et al. Effects of rate-dependent left bundle branch block on global and regional left ventricular function. Circulation67, 1059–1065 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernooy K, Verbeek XA, Peschar M et al. Left bundle branch block induces ventricular remodelling and functional septal hypoperfusion. Eur. Heart J.26, 91–98. (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernooy K, Verbeek XA, Peschar M, Prinzen FW. Relation between abnormal ventricular impulse conduction and heart failure. J. Interv. Cardiol.16, 557–562 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prinzen FW, Augustijn CH, Arts T et al. Redistribution of myocardial fiber strain and blood flow by asynchronous activation. Am. J. Physiol.259, H300–H308 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PM, Plotnikov A, Kanagaratnam P et al. Altering ventricular activation remodels gap junction distribution in canine heart. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.12, 570–577 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Land V, Germans T, van Dijk J et al. The effect of left bundle branch block on left ventricular remodeling, dyssynchrony and deformation of the mitral valve apparatus: an observational cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging23, 529–536 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruch C, Stypmann J, Grude M et al. Left bundle branch block in chronic heart failure–impact on diastolic function, filling pressures, and B-type natriuretic peptide levels. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.19, 95–101 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma T, Tyberg JV, Smith ER. Effects of diastolic transseptal pressure gradient on ventricular septal position and motion. Circulation68, 1304–1314 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao HB, Gibson DG. Effects of intermittent left bundle branch block on left ventricular diastolic function: a case report. Int. J. Cardiol.46, 85–88 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Nardo D, Antolini M, Pitucco G et al. Effects of left bundle branch block on left ventricular function in apparently normal subjects: study by equilibrium radionuclide angiography at rest. Cardiology75, 365–371 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grover M, Engler RL. Acute pulmonary edema induced by left bundle branch block. Am. J. Cardiol.52, 648–649 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littmann L, Goldberg JR. Apparent bigeminy and pulsus alternans in intermittent left bundle-branch block. Clin. Cardiol.22, 490 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auricchio A, Fantoni C. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure. Ital. Heart J.6, 256–260 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DePuey EG, Guertler-Krawczynska E, Robbins WL. Thallium-201 SPECT in coronary artery disease patients with left bundle branch block. J. Nucl. Med.29, 1479–1485 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakkis NM, He ZX, Verani MS. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by exercise thallium-201 tomography in patients with a right ventricular pacemaker. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.29, 1221–1225 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.29, 744–749 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono S, Nohara R, Kambara H et al. Regional myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism in experimental left bundle branch block. Circulation85, 1125–1131 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrone-Filardi P, Bacharach SL, Dilsizian V, Bonow RO. Effects of regional systolic asynchrony on left ventricular global diastolic function in patients with coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.19, 739–744 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zile MR, Gaasch WH. Mechanical loads and the isovolumic and filling indices of left ventricular relaxation. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis.32, 333–346 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Youn H-J, Park C-S, Cho E-J et al. Left bundle branch block disturbs left anterior descending coronary artery flow: study using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.18, 1093–1098 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirzel HO, Senn M, Nuesch K et al. Thallium-201 scintigraphy in complete left bundle branch block. Am. J. Cardiol.53, 764–769 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI et al. Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.33, 1338–1346 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amitzur G, Manor D, Pressman A et al. Modulation of the arterial coronary blood flow by asynchronous activation with ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.18, 697–710 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolettis TM, Kyriakides ZS, Kremastinos DT. Coronary blood flow velocity during apical versus septal pacing. Int. J. Cardiol.66, 203–205 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biceroglu S, Yildiz A, Bayata S et al. Is there an association between left bundle branch block and coronary slow flow in patients with normal coronary arteries? Angiology58, 685–688 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kayano H, Ueda H, Kawamata T et al. Improved septal contraction and coronary flow velocity after cardiac resynchronization therapy elucidated by strain imaging and pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography. J. Cardiol.47, 51–61 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yildirim A, Soylu O, Dagdeviren B et al. Cardiac resynchronization improves coronary blood flow. Tohoku J. Exp. Med.211, 43–47 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides ZS, Athanase G. Manolis , Theofilos M. Kolettis. The effects of ventricular asynchrony on myocardial perfusion. Int. J. Cardio.119, 3–9 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, Nabar A, Beatty G, Wellens HJ. Variable patterns of septal activation in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.14, 135–141 (2003)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Henein M, Coats A, Gibson D. Different effects of abnormal activation and myocardial disease on left ventricular ejection and filling times. Heart84, 272–276 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirwitz MJ, Lange RA, Landau C et al. Utility of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in identifying underlying coronary artery disease in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function. Am. J. Cardiol.77, 1289–1292 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talreja D, Gruver C, Sklenar J et al. Efficient utilization of echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular systolic function. Am. Heart J.139, 394–398 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner MS, Bleasdale RA, Vinereanu D et al. Electrical and mechanical components of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration and left bundle-branch block: impact of left and biventricular pacing. Circulation109(21), 2544–2549 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernooy K, Verbeek XAA, Crijns HJG et al. Biventricular pacing reverses left ventricular non-uniform workload and remodelling induced by left bundle branch block. Eur. Heart J. (abstract suppl.), 130 (2004)
   Google Scholar
• Miyoshi F, Kobayashi Y, Itou H, et al. Prolonged paced QRS duration as a predictor for congestive heart failure in patients with right ventricular apical pacing. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.28 (11), 1182–1188 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kachboura S, Ben Halima A, Fersi I, Marrakchi S, Zouaoui W, Kammoun I. Assessment of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction after cardiac pacing in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Ann. Cardiol. Angeiol. (Paris)57(1), 29–36 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Keefe JH Jr, Abuissa H, Jones PG et al. Effect of chronic right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function. Am. J. Cardiol.95, 771–773 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantengco MV, Thomas RL, Karpawich PP. Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term right ventricular apical pacing in the young. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37, 2093–2100 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing. Circulation113, 2082–2088 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaab B, Fröhlig G, Alexander C et al. Influence of right ventricular stimulation site on left ventricular function in atrial synchronous ventricular pacing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.33, 317–323 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA288, 3115–3123 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA et al.; MOde Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation107, 2932–2937 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao HB, Brecker SJ, Gibson DG. Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. Br. Heart J.69, 166–173 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varma N. Left ventricular conduction delays induced by right ventricular apical pacing: effect of left ventricular dysfunction and bundle branch block. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.19, 114–122 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Holman ER, van Erven L, Van Der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 1642–1648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhoff D, Oikawa RY, Sagawa K. Influence of pacing site on canine left ventricular contraction. Am. J. Physiol.251, H428–H435 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Blanc JJ, Etienne Y, Gilard M et al. Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure. Circulation96, 3273–3277 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne MJ, Helm RH, Daya S et al. Diminished left ventricular dyssynchrony and impact of resynchronization in failing hearts with right versus left bundle branch block. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50, 1484–1490 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantoni C, Kawabata M, Massaro R et al. Right and left ventricular activation sequence in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a detailed analysis using three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping system. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.16, 112–119 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egoavil CA, Ho RT, Greenspon AJ, Pavri BB. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with right bundle branch block: analysis of pooled data from the MIRACLE and Contak CD trials. Heart Rhythm2, 611–615 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breithardt OA, Stellbrink C, Herbots L et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy can reverse abnormal myocardial strain distribution in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42, 486–494 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansalone G, Giannantoni P, Ricci R et al. Doppler myocardial imaging to evacuate the effectiveness of pacing sites in patients receiving biventricular pacing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.39, 489–499 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani A, Barold S. Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 2183–2192 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Dryden DM et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. A systematic review. JAMA297, 2502–2514 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma N, Jia P, Rudy Y. Electrocardiographic imaging of patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J. Electrocardiol.40 (6 Suppl.), S174–S178 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ, Molhoek SG et al. Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.15, 544–549 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badano LP, Gaddi O, Peraldo C et al. Left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration and in patients with right and left bundle branch block. Europace9, 41–47 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitzalis MV, Iacoviello M, Romito R et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.40, 1615–1622 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazeau S, Bordachor P, Jauvert G et al. Echocardiographic modeling of cardiac dyssynchrony before and during multisite stimulation: a prospective study. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.26, 137–143 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44, 1834–1840 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CM, Fung JWH, Zhang Q et al. Tissue Doppler imaging is superior to strain rate imaging and postsystolic shortening on the prediction of reverse remodeling in both ischemic and nonischemic heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation110, 66–73 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster P, Faerestrand S, Ohm O-J. Color tissue velocity imaging can show resynchronization of longitudinal left ventricular contraction pattern by biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure. Heart89, 859–864 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd El Rahman MY, Hui W, Yigitbasi M et al. Detection of left ventricular asynchrony in patients with right bundle branch block after repair of tetralogy of Fallot using tissue Doppler imaging-derived strain. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 915–921 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorcsan J, Kanzaki H, Bazaz R, Dohi K, Schwartzman D. Usefulness of echocardiographic tissue synchronization imaging to predict acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am. J. Cardiol.93, 1178–1181 (2004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CM, Zhang Q, Fung JWH et al. A novel tool to assess systolic asynchrony and identify responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy by tissue synchronization imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 677–684 (2005)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanakis S, Kearney MT, Siva A et al. Real-time three dimensional echocardiography: a novel technique to quantify global left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Circulation112, 992–1000 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CM, Bax JJ, Monaghan M et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac dyssynchrony for predicting a favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart90, vi17–vi22 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu CM, Chau E, Sanderson JE et al. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure. Circulation105, 438–445 (2002)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penicka M, Bartunek J, De Bruyne B et al. Improvement of left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy is predicted by tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography, Circulation109, 978–983 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane RE, Chow AW, Chin D et al. Selection and optimization of biventricular pacing; the role of echocardiography. Heart90, vi10–v6 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansalone G, Giannantoni P, Ricci R et al. Doppler myocardial imaging in patients with heart failure receiving biventricular pacing treatment. Am. Heart J.142, 881–896 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinelli Filho M, Pedrosa AA, Costa R et al. Biventricular pacing improves clinical behavior and reduces prevalence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure. Arq. Bras. Cardiol.78, 110–113 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toussaint JF, Lavergne T, Kerrou K et al. Basal asynchrony and resynchronization with biventricular pacing predict long-term improvement of LV function in heart failure patients. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.26, 1815–1823 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bax JJ, Molhoek SG, van Erven L et al. Usefulness of myocardial tissue Doppler echocardiography to evaluate left ventricular dyssynchrony before and after biventricular pacing in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol.91, 94–97 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molhoek G, Van Erven L, Bootsma M et al. QRS duration and shortening to predict clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.27, 308–313 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deswal A, Petersen NJ, Feldman AM et al. Cytokines and cytokine receptors in advanced heart failure: an analysis of the cytokine database from the Vesnarinone trial (VEST). Circulation103, 2055–2059 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filzmaier K, Sinha AM, Breithardt OA et al. Short-term effects of cardiac resynchronization on brain natriuretic peptide release in patients with systolic heart failure and ventricular conduction disturbance (abstr). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.39, 104 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson GS, Berger RD, Fetics BJ et al. Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block. Circulation102, 3053–3059 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlebacher JA, Barbarash S. Intraventricular conduction delay and functional mitral regurgitation. Am. J. Cardiol.88, 83–86 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Miller WL, Ballman KV, Hodge DO et al. Risk factor implications of incidentally discovered uncomplicated bundle branch block. Mayo Clin. Proc.80, 1585–1590 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francia P, Balla C, Paneni F, Volpe M. Left bundle-branch block-pathophysiology, prognosis, and clinical management. Clin. Cardiol.30, 110–115 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar