Cardiac mapping and stem cell delivery for the damaged myocardium

References

• Rich MW. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and etiology of congestive heart failure in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.45(8), 968–974 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldeman GA, Croft JB, Giles WH, Rashidee A. Hospitalization of patients with heart failure: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1985 to 1995. Am. Heart J.137(2), 352–360 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier B, Thimme W, Schoeller R, Fried A, Behrens S, Theres H. Improved therapy and outcome for patients with acute myocardial infarction – Data of the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry from 1999 to 2004. Int. J. Cardiol. DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.043 (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, Zado E. Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation101(11), 1288–1296 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos M, Lashevsky I, Reisner S, Gepstein L. Electroanatomic mapping of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.38(7), 2020–2027 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callans DJ, Ren JF, Michele J, Marchlinski FE, Dillon SM. Electroanatomic left ventricular mapping in the porcine model of healed anterior myocardial infarction. Correlation with intracardiac echocardiography and pathological analysis. Circulation100(16), 1744–1750 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsia HH, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Characterization of endocardial electrophysiological substrate in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation108(6), 704–710 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornowski R, Leon MB, Fuchs S et al. Electromagnetic guidance for catheter-based transendocardial injection: a platform for intramyocardial angiogenesis therapy. Results in normal and ischemic porcine models. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35(4), 1031–1039 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gepstein L, Hayam G, Shpun S, Ben-Haim SA. Hemodynamic evaluation of the heart with a nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping technique. Circulation96(10), 3672–3680 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornowski R, Hong MK, Gepstein L et al. Preliminary animal and clinical experiences using an electromechanical endocardial mapping procedure to distinguish infarcted from healthy myocardium. Circulation98(11), 1116–1124 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gyongyosi M, Sochor H, Khorsand A, Gepstein L, Glogar D. Online myocardial viability assessment in the catheterization laboratory via NOGA electroanatomic mapping: quantitative comparison with thallium-201 uptake. Circulation104(9), 1005–1011 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gepstein L, Hayam G, Ben-Haim SA. A novel method for nonfluoroscopic catheter-based electroanatomical mapping of the heart. In vitroand in vivo accuracy results. Circulation95(6), 1611–1622 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornowski R, Fuchs S, Tio FO, Pierre A, Epstein SE, Leon MB. Evaluation of the acute and chronic safety of the biosense injection catheter system in porcine hearts. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.48(4), 447–453; discussion 454–445 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Haim SA, Osadchy D, Schuster I, Gepstein L, Hayam G, Josephson ME. Nonfluoroscopic, in vivo navigation and mapping technology. Nat. Med.2(12), 1393–1395 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemm HU, Franzen O, Ventura R, Willems S. Catheter based simultaneous mapping of cardiac activation and motion: a review. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J.7(3), 148–159 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klemm HU, Steven D, Johnsen C et al. Catheter motion during atrial ablation due to the beating heart and respiration: impact on accuracy and spatial referencing in three-dimensional mapping. Heart Rhythm4(5), 587–592 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noseworthy PA, Malchano ZJ, Ahmed J, Holmvang G, Ruskin JN, Reddy VY. The impact of respiration on left atrial and pulmonary venous anatomy: implications for image-guided intervention. Heart Rhythm2(11), 1173–1178 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornowski R, Fuchs S, Shiran A et al. Catheter-based electromechanical mapping to assess regional myocardial function: a comparative analysis with transthoracic echocardiography. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.52(3), 342–347 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lessick J, Smeets JL, Reisner SA, Ben-Haim SA. Electromechanical mapping of regional left ventricular function in humans: comparison with echocardiography. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.50(1), 10–18 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornowski R, Hong MK, Shiran A et al. Electromechanical characterization of acute experimental myocardial infarction. J. Invasive Cardiol.11(6), 329–336 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs S, Kornowski R, Shiran A, Pierre A, Ellahham S, Leon MB. Electromechanical characterization of myocardial hibernation in a pig model. Coron. Artery Dis.10(3), 195–198 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessick J, Hayam G, Zaretsky A, Reisner SA, Schwartz Y, Ben-Haim SA. Evaluation of inotropic changes in ventricular function by NOGA mapping: comparison with echocardiography. J. Appl. Physiol.93(2), 418–426 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poppas A, Sheehan FH, Reisman M, Harms V, Kornowski R. Validation of viability assessment by electromechanical mapping by three-dimensional reconstruction with dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol.93(9), 1097–1101 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrington SF, Chambers J, Hallett WA, O’Doherty MJ, Roxburgh JC, Nunan TO. Comparison of sestamibi, thallium, echocardiography and PET for the detection of hibernating myocardium. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging31(3), 355–361 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonow RO, Dilsizian V. Assessing viable myocardium with thallium-201. Am. J. Cardiol.70(14), E10–E17 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonow RO, Dilsizian V. Thallium-201 and technetium-99m-sestamibi for assessing viable myocardium. J. Nucl. Med.33(5), 815–818 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandes VB, Ben Freedman S, Allman KC et al. Detection of myocardial viability in stunned or hibernating myocardium by delayed emptying on radionuclide ventriculography. Am. J. Cardiol.67(6), 529–532 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haque T, Furukawa T, Takahashi M, Kinoshita M. Identification of hibernating myocardium by dobutamine stress echocardiography: comparison with thallium-201 reinjection imaging. Am. Heart J.130(3 Pt 1), 553–563 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoeflin F, Roesler H, Ledermann H, Romanello S, Weinreich R. Detection of non-perfused, viable myocardium with 18F-FDG using a specially designed gamma camera. A simple method to detect hibernating myocardium. Acta Radiol. Suppl.376, 133–134 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuikka JT, Mussalo H, Hietakorpi S, Vanninen E, Lansimies E. Evaluation of myocardial viability with technetium-99m hexakis-2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile and iodine-123 phenylpentadecanoic acid and single photon emission tomography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med.19(10), 882–889 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Salcedo EE, Go RT, Saha G, Beachler A. Identification of ischemic and hibernating myocardium: feasibility of post-exercise F-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn.22(2), 100–106 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsuo H, Watanabe S, Nishida Y et al. Identification of asynergic but viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease by gated blood pool scintigraphy during isosorbide dinitrate and low-dose dobutamine infusion: comparison with thallium-201 scintigraphy with reinjection. Ann. Nucl. Med.8(4), 283–293 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parodi O, De Maria R, Testa R et al. Super-normal 201Tl retention in hibernating myocardium: an ex-vivo study using the failing human heart. Cardiovasc. Res.38(3), 727–735 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornowski R, Hong MK, Leon MB. Comparison between left ventricular electromechanical mapping and radionuclide perfusion imaging for detection of myocardial viability. Circulation98(18), 1837–1841 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyongyosi M, Khorsand A, Sochor H et al. Characterization of hibernating myocardium with NOGA electroanatomic endocardial mapping. Am. J. Cardiol.95(6), 722–728 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch KC, vom Dahl J, Wenderdel M et al. Myocardial viability assessment by endocardial electroanatomic mapping: comparison with metabolic imaging and functional recovery after coronary revascularization. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.38(1), 91–98 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggers H, Botker HE, Sogaard P et al. Electromechanical mapping versus positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41(5), 843–848 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perin EC, Silva GV, Sarmento-Leite R et al. Assessing myocardial viability and infarct transmurality with left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with stable coronary artery disease: validation by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation106(8), 957–961 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale PR, Losordo DW, Tkebuchava T, Chen D, Milliken CE, Isner JM. Catheter-based myocardial gene transfer utilizing nonfluoroscopic electromechanical left ventricular mapping. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.34(1), 246–254 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oron U, Halevy O, Yaakobi T et al. Technical delivery of myogenic cells through an endocardial injection catheter for myocardial cell implantation. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Intervent.3(4), 227–230 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vale PR, Losordo DW, Milliken CE et al. Randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of catheter-based myocardial gene transfer for therapeutic angiogenesis using left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation103(17), 2138–2143 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science275(5302), 964–967 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T et al. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ. Res.85(3), 221–228 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H et al. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation103(5), 634–637 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ et al. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat. Med.7(4), 430–436 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto A, Tkebuchava T, Yamaguchi J et al. Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization of myocardial ischemia. Circulation107(3), 461–468 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittenger MF, Martin BJ. Mesenchymal stem cells and their potential as cardiac therapeutics. Circ. Res.95(1), 9–20 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature410(6829), 701–705 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S et al. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98(18), 10344–10349 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aicher A, Brenner W, Zuhayra M et al. Assessment of the tissue distribution of transplanted human endothelial progenitor cells by radioactive labeling. Circulation107(16), 2134–2139 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbash IM, Chouraqui P, Baron J et al. Systemic delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to the infarcted myocardium: feasibility, cell migration, and body distribution. Circulation108(7), 863–868 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner RE, Schofer C, Weipoltshammer K et al. Recruitment of bone-marrow-derived cells by skeletal and cardiac muscle in adult dystrophic mdx mice. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.)199(5), 391–396 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson SW, Cho PW, Levitsky HI et al. Arterial delivery of genetically labelled skeletal myoblasts to the murine heart: long-term survival and phenotypic modification of implanted myoblasts. Cell Transplant5(1), 77–91 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachinger V, Assmus B, Britten MB et al. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44(8), 1690–1699 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauer BE, Brehm M, Zeus T et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation106(15), 1913–1918 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Lotz J et al. Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet364(9429), 141–148 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbs S, Linke A, Adams V et al. Transplantation of blood-derived progenitor cells after recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion: first randomized and placebo-controlled study. Circ. Res.97(8), 756–762 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs S, Satler LF, Kornowski R et al. Catheter-based autologous bone marrow myocardial injection in no-option patients with advanced coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41(10), 1721–1724 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perin EC, Dohmann HF, Borojevic R et al. Transendocardial, autologous bone marrow cell transplantation for severe, chronic ischemic heart failure. Circulation107(18), 2294–2302 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perin EC, Dohmann HF, Borojevic R et al. Improved exercise capacity and ischemia 6 and 12 months after transendocardial injection of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation110(11 Suppl.1), II213–II218 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse HF, Kwong YL, Chan JK, Lo G, Ho CL, Lau CP. Angiogenesis in ischaemic myocardium by intramyocardial autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation. Lancet361(9351), 47–49 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AN, Geffner L, Vina RF et al. Surgical treatment for congestive heart failure with autologous adult stem cell transplantation: a prospective randomized study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.130(6), 1631–1638 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado LC, Saliaris AP, Schuleri KH et al. Cardiac repair with intramyocardial injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(32), 11474–11479 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman T, Polin G, Osman H et al. A quantitative, randomized study evaluating three methods of mesenchymal stem cell delivery following myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J.27(9), 1114–1122 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompilio G, Steinhoff G, Liebold A et al. Direct minimally invasive intramyocardial injection of bone marrow-derived AC133+ stem cells in patients with refractory ischemia: preliminary results. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.56(2), 71–76 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pompilio G, Cannata A, Peccatori F et al. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration: a novel strategy for cell collection and surgical injection. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78(5), 1808–1812 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herreros J, Prosper F, Perez A et al. Autologous intramyocardial injection of cultured skeletal muscle-derived stem cells in patients with non-acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J.24(22), 2012–2020 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menasche P, Hagege AA, Scorsin M et al. Myoblast transplantation for heart failure. Lancet357(9252), 279–280 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menasche P, Hagege AA, Vilquin JT et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41(7), 1078–1083 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siminiak T, Kalawski R, Fiszer D et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for the treatment of postinfarction myocardial injury: Phase I clinical study with 12 months of follow-up. Am. Heart J.148(3), 531–537 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar RR, Lill M, Chen PS. Stem cell therapy for myocardial repair: is it arrhythmogenic? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(12), 2070–2072 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyahara Y, Nagaya N, Kataoka M et al. Monolayered mesenchymal stem cells repair scarred myocardium after myocardial infarction. Nat. Med.12(4), 459–465 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbach M, Bostani T, Roell W et al. Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts. Blood110(4), 1362–1369 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young PP, Vaughan DE, Hatzopoulos AK. Biologic properties of endothelial progenitor cells and their potential for cell therapy. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis.49(6), 421–429 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki H, Kawamoto A, Ishikawa M et al. Dose-dependent contribution of CD34-positive cell transplantation to concurrent vasculogenesis and cardiomyogenesis for functional regenerative recovery after myocardial infarction. Circulation113(10), 1311–1325 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson M, Duckers E, Ramacharitar S et al. Magnetically supported procedures and cardiac regeneration. Eurointervention2(Suppl. B), B42–B46 (2007).
   Google Scholar